Mod edit
Votecount:
Skruffs (1): Ether
Ether (1): Skruffs
Ryan (1): Erg0
Erg0 (1): Ryan
NabakovNabakov (1): Elmo
Not voting (4): Korlash, The Fonz, Bookitty, NabakovNabakov.
With 9 alive it's 5 to lynch. At deadline, the one with the most votes is lynched. In case of a tie I will look at who reached the highest amount of votes first.
Votecount:
Skruffs (1): Ether
Ether (1): Skruffs
Ryan (1): Erg0
Erg0 (1): Ryan
NabakovNabakov (1): Elmo
Not voting (4): Korlash, The Fonz, Bookitty, NabakovNabakov.
With 9 alive it's 5 to lynch. At deadline, the one with the most votes is lynched. In case of a tie I will look at who reached the highest amount of votes first.
Hey ether, start with the post that that conversation originally started: Post 2211
I go through various scenarios, you attack me for not knowing for sure that Fonz was scum, and suggest that lynching the lovers and killing one scum for sure as compared to possibly mislynching was 'sacrificing a lynch'.
I reiterate and explain: at that point, I thought your aggravational play was some sort of genuine sincerity in your own self righteousness. However, looking back, I can see that you were dead set on a Sikario lynch and 'considering the options' could have meant you 'sacrificing' the second most important mislynch you needed in the game.
More insults. "Stop thinking and listen to me", is the gist of post 2217, whcih is ironic because in a later post on the same page, your tone changes.
I call you out on being heavy handed, and you try to turn what I was saying into makign it abuot confirming Fonz and BooKitty's roles: When in fact the point of my suggestions was about finding the best way to maximize the benefit and minimize the risk for our lynch that day.
I point out what would happen if we mislynch; and then ask why sikario is being pressured.
You pull a emotion card for losing Bookitty, make the death of fonz as nothing more than a confirmation of his role (rather than a reduction of hte number of scum in the game, which should be the priority, something that Bookitty even agreed with at that time)
and
Right after accusing me of thinking we would mislynch, you say that the benefit of mislynching yesterday was:
"At least we'd get the mislynch over with at a point that, y'know, wouldn't lose us the game."
However, you missed something altogether: If we had lynched the lovers yesterday, we would be 8/3 today instead of 9/4, we wouldn't have the scum with an advantage of having a partner that will quick hammer *with immunity* at every given chance, and we would have had, possibly, a different combination or players around today. So you can yell at me all you want for not seeing the 'benefits' of mislynching yesterday over lynching scum AND town yesterday all you want, I think it's jsut a cover for your own agenda, and I'm sticking with that.
Later on in the post you say that I am "resigned" to a Siklynch, which was just blatantly not true, and both tell me to do my homework AND to start voting. Less talk more action! (which ties in with the "Idiots" post before. 'Stop thinking, and do what I say, even though everything I say to do turns out wrong and I will wind up blaming YOU for it later!' would have been the APPROPRIATE 'truth-in-advertising' post to make at that time.)
I was initiating conversation about it, the reasons behind it, etc, trying to find out why it was happening so that I could defend or attack it. You tell me to figure it out for yourself and then cede that you didn't like Guadian's deadline behavior. You point out that Fonz defended him, and then basically say that ManaSpryte brought it on himself for not liking your vote on him: But with your intentionally arrogant, heavyhanded posting style in this game, which you yourself seem to realize, I don't believe that that is a valid reason: It's like saying that your wife must have wanted a black eye, or she wouldn't have burned the roast.
Most importantly, you suggest that Nab as scum is a reason to suspect SIkario. However, and I pointed this otu already, and elmo just reiterated it in his last post, IF one person being scum incriminates the second, you lynch the FIRST person first, NOT the second, which was your intentions. Even if you *were* town, and *honestly* believed that Nab and Sikario were scum, the way you are going about trying to determine it is Wrong and scummy.
Sikario AGREES with you, at that point, BooKitty pounces on this (Which is why I am skeptical of the benefit of ahving a confirmed townie around, esp if the townie is oppurtunistic or easily mislead. {no offense meant bookitty})
I, (quite calmly I think) point out that you are forcing assumptions onto me, especially regarding the sikario lynch. I asked again why he would be Best, and bring up the fonz/bookitty thing. (I know, I bring it up a lot, but that kind of thing really pings me)
ERg0 'takes ether's advice', dropping the 'lynch fonz' mindset and 'trying to think'.... he then turns his attention to Ryan (which I guess hasn't wavered yyet)
vacation talk,a nd then Ryan throws in endorsement of the sikario lynch.
After that, things start to calm down, but I think it's funny that Ether was telling me to 'form my own opinions', and I'm basically the only person who posted in those two pages who actually DID form any opinion that WASN'T following behind Ether.
Erg0, Ryan, Nabakov, even Sikario did, and he's the one she was attacking. BooKitty also had him high up on her list. THat's 6 players, out of 11, all against 1 player, who turned out to be a townie. And yet when I try to stop Ether's nearly cultlike following the next day from blindly lynching Nab the same way as she got Sikario lynched, *I* suddenly replace Nabakov as the day's target.
So you can see why I'm pretty dead set on you, Ether.
