In post 297, BlackVoid wrote:I'm here. Sorry for lack of posting. I don't know why I wasn't prodded before replacement. The mod seems aware of how prods work given he posted it in the OP. Will be catching up today since I have free time.
Not sure what to think about your immediate appearance after a replacement notice was posted. It suggests that you hadn't just forgotten about the existence of this game, but were deliberately flying under the radar, waiting for a prod to just barely fulfill the minimum activity requirement.
In post 297, BlackVoid wrote:I'm here. Sorry for lack of posting. I don't know why I wasn't prodded before replacement. The mod seems aware of how prods work given he posted it in the OP. Will be catching up today since I have free time.
Not sure what to think about your immediate appearance after a replacement notice was posted. It suggests that you hadn't just forgotten about the existence of this game, but were deliberately flying under the radar, waiting for a prod to just barely fulfill the minimum activity requirement.
Looking forward to your contributions.
Hmmmmmm not sure how I feel about this
Like, I've done the same thing where I just sit on my ass and don't post in the thread bc lazy or not motivated and then when I'm about to be replaced I finally do something
I find it hard to belive Blackvoid- with no posts and no investment in the game- was too lazy or unmotivated to post for 8 days then still takes a tone criticizing the mod for starting to replace him.
In post 301, xRECKONERx wrote:Like, I've done the same thing where I just sit on my ass and don't post in the thread bc lazy or not motivated and then when I'm about to be replaced I finally do something
For 8 days? I realize how Gurgi not enforcing the 48 hour prods would give a false sense of complacency, but that doesn't exonerate BlackVoid the least bit from posting at least something to the effect of "hi, sorry, I didn't catch up yet" around the first time he was called out on his inactivity, which I did four days ago.
Oh, I misread 289 as you saying you intending to iso him that rather than saying you had (in 287).
287- the iso- you’re still debating on whether he’s town or scum. I don’t see the point where you move from this to 'willing to hammer'.
Would like to ask no hammers til Wednesday, because I hope to be able to do all of my meta work (and actually put the flavor into my completed game then). If I haven't finished it by then, it's not gonna be soon and I'll just have to play without meta backing me up. I will NOT need to replace out of this game and am caught up. Just not able to devote the time I'd like to devote to getting inside people's heads at the moment. (JSYK, this game is my #2 ms priority at this point, and I've been spending about 5 hours per day on ms. Hopefully, that'll change real fast.)
In post 297, BlackVoid wrote:I'm here. Sorry for lack of posting. I don't know why I wasn't prodded before replacement. The mod seems aware of how prods work given he posted it in the OP. Will be catching up today since I have free time.
Okay, you're clearly following the thread.
Do you have any thoughts on the game? It doesn't have to be a really long catch-up post if you don't have time for that.
In post 297, BlackVoid wrote:I'm here. Sorry for lack of posting. I don't know why I wasn't prodded before replacement. The mod seems aware of how prods work given he posted it in the OP. Will be catching up today since I have free time.
Okay, you're clearly following the thread.
Do you have any thoughts on the game? It doesn't have to be a really long catch-up post if you don't have time for that.
VOTE: BlackVoid
Where are you?
Why?
insanity018 wrote:I have been in games where the 'obvious' 'too scummy to be scum' really was scum. Nothing that TGP is saying makes sense from a town point of view.
Been feelin' like I'm being blinded by how much I love Korts and I think his recent attack on Hopkirk was weak. And he knew it was weak. It was for show, not for real.
What made you think it was not real?
I agree that the Korts push on Hopkirk was weak, as it's hard to see scum intentionally lying about something that could so easily be verified. But reacting to thinking you had caught someone in a lie and then going back after getting an explanation also seems somewhat reasonable.
Korts push seems surface-level, but that doesn't have to be a scum maneuver.
Because there's a slot that is following the game that's refusing to post.
TheGoldenParadox wrote:
insanity018 wrote:
I agree that the Korts push on Hopkirk was weak, as it's hard to see scum intentionally lying about something that could so easily be verified. But reacting to thinking you had caught someone in a lie and then going back after getting an explanation also seems somewhat reasonable.
Korts push seems surface-level, but that doesn't have to be a scum maneuver.
Thank you for essentially re-stating my point using different words.
Are you going to tell us what meta reasons you have for why Hopkirk is scum?
Ugh. At this point, it's pretty clear that TGP is not going to explain himself, or post anything useful. Can we get this lynch over with? We'll deal with BlackVoid afterwards.
Actually how did you think that was a hammer?
5 to lynch, you're not voting, Blackvoid obviously isn't voting, me/Jingle made it clear this page we weren't voting you yet. That's 4 who are obviously not voting you which means not enough for a hammer.
The votecount is on the last page so easy to find. Me/Jingle right above you said we were willing to hammer. I don't get why you'd post 'I think that was a hammer' then not look back to the previous page to check given two people have obvious intent to hammer.
