@Roadbird, did the Mod tell u that u had no abilities and that you won with the town?
If not, did you try to do any abilities at night(i.e. protect X, shoot Y, investigate Z, unleash the tomato of doom) ?
Its: if a townie claims townie as last resort to divert a lynch, he should be lynched (except if his claim can be proven)Which one is it?
@Roadbird, did the Mod tell u that u had no abilities and that you won with the town?
true.If you continue to not die, we have to come to a decision on you eventually.
To save a pro town player from being lynched. Unless it turns out your both scum, but didn't know it, and get choices when the highest ranked scum or w/e dies. That would be funny.RoadBird wrote:@mith: Why did you do that?!
LyingBrian wrote:that's EXACTLY my point, VitaminR! if he's NOT a vanilla townie, then he must have a role... we can reasonably assume that armlx was pro-town... 3 of the 4 people who have died so far have BLACK text following their names... and everybody knows that pro-town roles make up the biggest percentage of players... i think we can also reasonably assume that armlx's verse is the vanilla townie verse... which brings me back to my question...
what is RoadBird's role based on the verse he claimed? a "thanker"?
Want a hint, Fritz? LB basically said he "couldn't understand" why someone was innocent (Roadbird)... why do you think that is?Fritzler wrote:Gah, I want to lynch VisMaior and LB. I'm having trouble deciding.
oh, so you thought he was innocent, yet you kept your vote on him? Keep me noted. I should just go through the thread for you to answer all of your known falsehoods in one area.LyingBrian wrote:unvote
@LoudmouthLee
do you mind clarifying the point then?.. at the point at which i said that mith had not claimed yet... how would you interpret RoadBird's verse in light of this being a Mafia game w/o the context of mith's verse?.. it would seem that mith, RoadBird, and whoever else are townies able to confirm each other... also, i never IMPLIED that i "couldn't understand" why someone was innocent, i SAID that i "couldn't understand" what his role was... BIG difference... twisting MY words to fit YOUR contextNOTED...
and we have cad's Vote Count:i never IMPLIED that i "couldn't understand" why someone was innocent, i SAID that i "couldn't understand" what his role was... BIG difference...
So you unvoted (your vote was ON RB) saying that you never questioned his innocence?Vote count:
4 LyingBrian (Fuldu, Commodore Amazing, RoadBird, Fritzler)
5 RoadBird (Dragon Phoenix, LyingBrian, EnderX, Coron, Kerplunk)
1 Dragon Phoenix (inHimshallibe)
3 VisMaior (mith, PookyTheMagicalBear, Thoth)
not voting (3): LoudmouthLee, VisMaior, VitaminR
9 to lynch.