In post 372, chamber wrote:How about the fact that I never moved my vote to slimer as another reason to take it seriously?
I bet if you asked everyone. Nobody thought that vote on me was serious.
The fact you didn’t vote slimer is why we are in this mess. If your vote was serious you should have said so at the time. Saying it multiple pages later is too late
In post 377, chamber wrote:I don't believe you. You are just throwing more shit at the wall to try and gish gallop your way into a miss-lynch.
See, this is why RVS makes no sense. We're supposed to take it seriously while also do what we want?
I get you could just be trying to get one over on Wimpy, but it kinda makes no sense that you'd use RVS as evidence.
I'm genuinely not trying to say your logic is scummy, I'm just reeeaaally trying to follow what's going on here
In post 372, chamber wrote:How about the fact that I never moved my vote to slimer as another reason to take it seriously?
I bet if you asked everyone. Nobody thought that vote on me was serious.
The fact you didn’t vote slimer is why we are in this mess. If your vote was serious you should have said so at the time. Saying it multiple pages later is too late
Also I don't tend to vote someone until I'm fairly sure they're scum. That might have been what they've been doing. But they've also said they were trying to question me into a scumslip, so that's another reason
In post 375, chamber wrote:You've since asked why. I've answered. I didn't say I explained at the time of the vote.
Your answers still point to omgus tbh
As I said, some people have much broader definitions of OMGUS than I do. To me an OMGUS vote is voting someone purely because they are voting you. The notion that I could be OMGUSing with that kind of lag is nonsense to me. Voting someone thats voting for you because their attack on you is bad isn't OMGUS imo (and I wouldn't even reduce my vote on you to that)
I think this is a bad point to have at all though. Reducing things this complex to buzz terms doesn't serve anyone.
In post 377, chamber wrote:I don't believe you. You are just throwing more shit at the wall to try and gish gallop your way into a miss-lynch.
I have no reason to lie about that. I’ve been an open book. Truthful and honest. Sadly you can’t say the same about yourself.
This is a good summation of why you suck. You haven't been an open book. You've been a dismissive asshole. You give yourself infinite charity and others none.
In post 377, chamber wrote:I don't believe you. You are just throwing more shit at the wall to try and gish gallop your way into a miss-lynch.
I have no reason to lie about that. I’ve been an open book. Truthful and honest. Sadly you can’t say the same about yourself.
This is a good summation of why you suck. You haven't been an open book. You've been a dismissive asshole. You give yourself infinite charity and others none.
Don’t call me an asshole.
I have been an open book cause I’ve shared my thoughts about anything and everything. I was dismissive about one question that you asked that was impossible for me to answer and you knew it was impossible when you asked it. I did go on go answer it though as best I could
There were ~130 posts between when you voted for me and when I voted for you. I was already seriously voting for you during your initial vote for me. In that period I unvoted you and then revoted you. During that period I attempted to enage with you about why you were voting me until it became clear you weren't interested in changing your mind.
What’s even worse. Is I backed off you and you doubled down. You tried to use that against me. You didn’t want me to change my mind. You want this 1v1 to happen.
You also think it’s scummy to make 3 posts on page 1 without them being scum hunting posts (something you are guilty of)
You also think it’s scummy to not post in the neighborhood
Sorry if you are town, you are too experienced to actually believe any of these things are scummy
In post 392, Wimpy wrote:What’s even worse. Is I backed off you and you doubled down. You tried to use that against me. You didn’t want me to change my mind. You want this 1v1 to happen.
I didn't use it against you, that was you misreading something that was slightly ambiguously worded. I was just to lazy to correct it among everything else. the "others" there was "other points". When DrDolittle came out against your "this is chamber pretending to be a newb" argument, you brought up a bunch of other arguments.
I do want this 1v1 though, I have no interest in playing anything with you.
on the topic of neighborhoods... (and a bit tinfoil)
what if wimpy and chamber are svs? scum agreeing to be fake neighbors could really disrupt the town
also i trust salamance and the turkey, i think they both have put good ideas forward and i trust their plans
