Spring Fever (Endgame)

Titus · Post Post #4100 (ISO) » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:04 pm

In post 4094, Gorkington wrote:
In post 1, RadiantCowbells wrote:The active member of a bond will have their abilities enhanced in return for the passive member losing their actions.
oh.
is dunnstral scumclaiming then?

I saw that. Nope, it would be me who is scumclaiming, but I figured passive bonds lost actions that could be done regardless of bond status.

Dunnstral · Post Post #4101 (ISO) » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:04 pm

Once again for you gorkington:

If I'm in no bond, I can track

If I'm passive, I can't do anything

If I'm active, I can watch

Gorkington · Post Post #4102 (ISO) » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:04 pm

oh wait no, that stacks up.
i thought youd claimed that you could only track as passive q.q

Alisae · Post Post #4103 (ISO) » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:05 pm

Dunn you never gave us flavor.

Heartless · Post Post #4104 (ISO) » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:05 pm

In post 4095, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 4086, Heartless wrote: even assuming you and dunn are both town, this still doesn't CLEAR us, it clears us TO YOU if you're town.

there's a p big difference
What is the difference?

You won't get lynched if you're cleared to us

we're not getting lynched w or wo u, buddy

Gorkington · Post Post #4105 (ISO) » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:06 pm

so, is titus scum then?
:/

Dunnstral · Post Post #4106 (ISO) » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:06 pm

In post 4103, Alisae wrote:Dunn you never gave us flavor.

Yes I did.

Dunnstral · Post Post #4107 (ISO) » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:06 pm

And I refuse to quote it. Find it yourself in this sea of spam.

Dunnstral · Post Post #4108 (ISO) » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:07 pm

In post 4104, Heartless wrote:
In post 4095, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 4086, Heartless wrote: even assuming you and dunn are both town, this still doesn't CLEAR us, it clears us TO YOU if you're town.

there's a p big difference
What is the difference?

You won't get lynched if you're cleared to us
we're not getting lynched w or wo u, buddy

Explain what the difference there is

if you're cleared to us do people assume all 3 of us are scum and lynch you first?

Gorkington · Post Post #4109 (ISO) » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:07 pm

someone smarter than me tell me if titus is scumclaiming lol

Eddiebyte · Post Post #4110 (ISO) » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:07 pm

he claimed houndour iirc (a fire dark dog pokemon)

Titus · Post Post #4111 (ISO) » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:07 pm

Mod: Can there be passive bond actions? Can you clarify post 1.

This is getting dumb.

Dunnstral · Post Post #4112 (ISO) » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:07 pm

Titus are you understanding your role correctly?

Are you sure that you can act while passive?

Dunnstral · Post Post #4113 (ISO) » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:08 pm

In post 4110, Eddiebyte wrote:(a fire dark dog pokemon)

No

The d&d riding dog

Titus · Post Post #4114 (ISO) » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:08 pm

In post 4112, Dunnstral wrote:Titus are you understanding your role correctly?

Are you sure that you can act while passive?

100000%

So I am getting mod to clarify.

Heartless · Post Post #4115 (ISO) » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:08 pm

In post 4093, Titus wrote:Nope.

I have a supporting action. That's why I wanted to be passive.

i have no idea what that means

Dunnstral · Post Post #4116 (ISO) » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:08 pm

In post 4111, Titus wrote:
Mod: Can there be passive bond actions? Can you clarify post 1.

This is getting dumb.

Titus...

look at your own role

Does it SPECIFICALLY say you can act while passive?

If not, assume you can't

Titus · Post Post #4117 (ISO) » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:09 pm

In post 4116, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 4111, Titus wrote:
Mod: Can there be passive bond actions? Can you clarify post 1.

This is getting dumb.
Titus...

look at your own role

Does it SPECIFICALLY say you can act while passive?

If not, assume you can't

Yes I can.

Heartless · Post Post #4118 (ISO) » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:10 pm

In post 4108, Dunnstral wrote:Explain what the difference there is

i'm saying that INDEPENDENT of anything you or titus do, we're not getting lynched

r u wanting a full claim bc no not doing that rn

Dunnstral · Post Post #4119 (ISO) » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:10 pm

Then the answer is that your role is special in letting you act while passive

Titus · Post Post #4120 (ISO) » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:10 pm

In post 4115, Heartless wrote:
In post 4093, Titus wrote:Nope.

I have a supporting action. That's why I wanted to be passive.
i have no idea what that means

Good.

Dunnstral · Post Post #4121 (ISO) » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:11 pm

In post 4118, Heartless wrote:
In post 4108, Dunnstral wrote:Explain what the difference there is
i'm saying that INDEPENDENT of anything you or titus do, we're not getting lynched

r u wanting a full claim bc no not doing that rn

Explain the difference between being cleared to me and Titus and being cleared to everyone (innocent child)

Titus · Post Post #4122 (ISO) » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:11 pm

In post 4118, Heartless wrote:
In post 4108, Dunnstral wrote:Explain what the difference there is
i'm saying that INDEPENDENT of anything you or titus do, we're not getting lynched

r u wanting a full claim bc no not doing that rn

You're getting it in the hood. Dunn is tracking me.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #4123 (ISO) » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:11 pm

In post 4111, Titus wrote:
Mod: Can there be passive bond actions? Can you clarify post 1.

This is getting dumb.

Any action that does not have a specific modifier will be disabled while passive.

If an action existed with the specific wording that they would only be enabled while passive, then they will only be enabled while passive.

Gorkington · Post Post #4124 (ISO) » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:12 pm

booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
i was so excited.