With 5 alive, it's 3 to lynch.
Deadline is in (expired on 2013-02-18 20:00:00).
Prodding Lincolm.
In post 447, Wickedestjr wrote:I'm becoming more confident in my Cheery Dog scum read (and slightly less confident in my Huntress scum read). So much in fact that I'm actually going toVote: Cheery Dogpartially for post 443.
Originally, when asked to explain his scumreads on Huntress and I, Cheery Dog justifies it by saying he has no reasons for suspecting us, but he simply hasn't established us as town. Yet, later, Malakittens asks him about his reads and he responds with this;
In post 443, Cheery Dog wrote:In post 442, Malakittens wrote:You know CD. Explain to me why you either have a town read on me or a null-leaning town on me?
I don't, I have higher scummy reads on them.
This is extremely contradictory and shows that Cheery Dog really just doesn't want to explain any of his reads. Cheery Dog called Huntress and I mafia solely because Lincolm and Malakittens seemed more townish, but when asked to explain the townreads, he says he reached the conclusion Malakittens was town because Huntress and I appear more suspicious. That's circular reasoning.
Another thing I've noticed is that he's basically coasted through this day with his vote on Huntress. It looks like bussing, but I also think the vote looks bad regardless of Huntress's allignment. Day 3 started, CD expressed suspicion of just me, later he expresses belief in a huntress/wicked scum pair, and then he votes for Huntress rather than me. It seems unnatural and he hasn't even asked any questions or done anything to strengthen his reads despite no reasoning being given. He's shown no townish interest.
In post 445, Cheery Dog wrote:My town reads weren't solely off activity levels, they helped yes, but there were other reasons.
In post 446, Wickedestjr wrote:I'm curious, how much merit do you put in this point?
In post 446, Wickedestjr wrote:Can you quote this please? (the bolded)
In post 446, Wickedestjr wrote:umm... unless I'm misreading, Wisdom's points in 115 look pretty similar to his points in 32.
In post 455, Huntress wrote:
How do activity levels help? What are you comparing them with? And what other reasons?
Can I have an answer to the last two questions in post 444 please.
In post 436, Huntress wrote:I found this exchange odd. Lincolm's reply doesn't follow. Why would he deduce that Cheery still suspected Mala from Cheery's statement that Wicked and I should be the pair. It's a cognitive dissonance that points at discussion outside the thread which would suggest they are scumpartners.
In post 436, Huntress wrote:What made you eliminate the rest of us here to leave Kmd and BB?
In post 459, Malakittens wrote:Or, maybe not.
Hold up.
Vote: Lincolm
Maybe that will give you some incentive.
Malakittens wrote:1. To me CD shot it down. Though I'll semi admit that he shot it down for a good reason. I will also admit that I may have just gotten lucky in the LyLo situation that I picked because depending on which players I picked I would have probably lost that game. I still have reason to believe that what I was going to do is a good thing. It helped me in another game and I don't see how CD saying 'Well if I was alive maybe it would have been a different outcome'.
2. Curious as to what changed? Reason why I didn't go through with the 'experiment'. Yeah I was going to use it to help me and get a little closer to figuring out who the scum team was. I felt as if CD destroyed it because he was talking about it happening while I was being scum. I have only played one scum game with CD so to me the whole thing was destroyed as soon as CD said it.
3. Not sure how to put this without it looking terribad. It's going to come off as a chainsaw defense...
She knows where my doubt it coming from. She knows the exact spot. I have known her to play where she is very single-minded as both alignments. It's a bit different when she's (scum) though because she'll go after one person until they are basically dead without looking at others. She's trying to reassure me that she's not doing what I believe she's doing.
Cheery Dog wrote:1. I figured what needed to be happening for town to still win, and choose huntress as I felt out of the three of mala/you/her that it was most likely top be easier to work how I think today and tomorrow need to go in order for town to win.
I've explained why I have Lincolm as town currently haven't I, even if it is only generalised, it's still all I believe I need for town(aka my team)to win.
Mala came in with contributions during those posts and as they made sense, you and huntress end up as the scumteam, though it is possible I'm also bias because Mala was reading me town which is correct whereas you other two have been attacking for what whatever reasons. and the fact I'm confident in my Lincolm read means I've probably not going to bother rereading the thread at all and just stick with what I believe will win the game for town.
In post 460, Lincolm wrote:If I'm not wrong, Cheery said Mala isn't scum before.
In post 468, Wickedestjr wrote:Malakittens wrote:1. To me CD shot it down. Though I'll semi admit that he shot it down for a good reason. I will also admit that I may have just gotten lucky in the LyLo situation that I picked because depending on which players I picked I would have probably lost that game. I still have reason to believe that what I was going to do is a good thing. It helped me in another game and I don't see how CD saying 'Well if I was alive maybe it would have been a different outcome'.
2. Curious as to what changed? Reason why I didn't go through with the 'experiment'. Yeah I was going to use it to help me and get a little closer to figuring out who the scum team was. I felt as if CD destroyed it because he was talking about it happening while I was being scum. I have only played one scum game with CD so to me the whole thing was destroyed as soon as CD said it.
3. Not sure how to put this without it looking terribad. It's going to come off as a chainsaw defense...
She knows where my doubt it coming from. She knows the exact spot. I have known her to play where she is very single-minded as both alignments. It's a bit different when she's (scum) though because she'll go after one person until they are basically dead without looking at others. She's trying to reassure me that she's not doing what I believe she's doing.
1. It seems as if I might not entirely understand the situation. What did you mean when you said Cheery Dog "shot it down"?
2. I was curious if anyone's reads had changed. We are nearing the end of day 3, so I also wanted everyone to establish their reads as a step towards making a final decision.
3. Can you go into any more detail? Was my assumption wrong?
I have issue with this quote. Malakittens expresses doubt of you for going after CD and Lincolm. Yet you're more concerned about the suspicion rather than convincing Malakittens that you're reads are correct. Scummy.