Mini 399 - Meets His Maker Mafia - GAME OVER!

[Penguins of the Serengeti]

Yamahako's latest explanation makes more sense.

I don't need to wait for a votecount. The Panzer guy has one vote. I can count to one.

vote: Pannzer

- now he has two votes.

[Quagmire]

1 - POTS [Panzerjager]
1 - Yamahako [POTS]
1 - Panzerjager [IH]

4 to lynch!

Remember to unvote before you vote! I do not count votes that don't unvote first.

Sorry for the VC delay.

[PJ.]

Cool guys we lose

Unvote, Vote:Panzerjager

[Penguins of the Serengeti]

My vote wasn't counted... other than that, Panzer, you're at lynch -1.

In "we lose" who is "we?"

Nice of you to self-vote, you weren't exactly looking for scum all along, were you.

[Atticus]

Cool guys we lose

Unvote, Vote:Panzerjager

So, you just wanted to quit the game on us?

[klebian]

Actually, pots

Remember to unvote before you vote! I do not count votes that don't unvote first.

so I have no sympathy for self-voters.

vote: panzer

[Penguins of the Serengeti]

unvote

I want Panzer to explain himself. I give him 48 hours MAX. I'll be glad to hammer.

[Atticus]

actually, pots, panzer just died.

[Atticus]

Oh, wait, miscalculatd votes.

[klebian]

Panzer, a claim would be nice.

[IH]

I'm pretty sure we're not at lylo, right?

[klebian]

Well, it's quite possible, if we have 2 scumz, but no one has yet to really say anything or respond to my questions about considering no lynch...

[IH]

Hmm, we could possibly be in lylo, depends if we have a scum group of 3 or 4.

We don't want to no lynch though, because there are two possible kills, correct?

[klebian]

Yeah, the problem is we don't know if jalyn was scum or serial killer...
With 3 kills n2, I think it's pretty safe to assume the game started with a scumgroup, a vigilante, and a serial killer. (Have I said this before? I feel like I'm repeating myself)

Let me try listing scenarios:

1) Beginning: Scum group of 4, 1 sk. (Pretty unbalanced)

• 1a) We now have a scumgroup of 2 and 1 sk left.
  
• 1b) We now have a scumgroup of 3 left. NOT POSSIBLE.

2) Beginning: Scum group of 3, 1 sk. (Seems more reasonable)

• 2a) We now have 1 scum and 1 sk left.
  
• 2b) We now have 2 scums left.

1b is ruled out because at this point scum would've won.

Consider 1a. We will have a lynch today, and probably 2 kills tonight. This will leave us with 3 people tomorrow. If we do not lynch scum, scum will most likely win. If we no lynch, we will have 4 people tomorrow. This situation seems to give scum the win in most cases that I think about.

2a) If we lynch scum, there will be 1 protown kill tonight. We'll have 4 people left- 1 scum, 3 town. If we lynch protown, there will be 2 kills tonight. 3 people left tomorrow, and a good chance of there being 1 scum, 1 sk, 1 townie. If we no lynch, with 2 kills tonight, we'll have 4 people tomorrow, probably 1 evil and 3 townies (with a good chance of 1 cross kill), possibly scum, sk, 2 townies.

2b) No lynch: 5 people tomorrow, 2 scum, 3 townies. LyLo. Lynch scum: 1 scum, 3 townies tomorrow. Lynch town: Scum wins.

1a and 2b put us in lylo. 2a gives a pretty reasonable chance.

Please point out errors I might have (probably) made. Also, please comment on which scenario you think is most reasonable and whether a no lynch seems like a viable opportunity.

[PJ.]

1) This one is huge. You may NOT claim or reveal your "name" in any way, shape, or form. To ensure that you've read this, when you confirm your role, put this first rule in the confirmation PM to me.

[PJ.]

Unless that is just the name then I can claim.

[Atticus]

Well, it's quite possible, if we have 2 scumz, but no one has yet to really say anything or respond to my questions about considering no lynch...

I did. *points*

[Penguins of the Serengeti]

1) This one is huge. You may NOT claim or reveal your "name" in any way, shape, or form. To ensure that you've read this, when you confirm your role, put this first rule in the confirmation PM to me.

Claim your ROLE, dummy. We don't need the name. Give us the role.

[Penguins of the Serengeti]

klebian, if we're confident we can lynch SCUM today, we should go ahead. We'll have one less scum tomorrow.

[PJ.]

Reporter. I tried to get Pooky lynched because I thought he was scum but he was nightkilled the same night I sent in the headlines.

[Yamahako]

Reporter. I tried to get Pooky lynched because I thought he was scum but he was nightkilled the same night I sent in the headlines.

I'll respect POTS and give you another 24 hours, but this doesn't make any sense to me, Pooky was killed before you even got out of the hospital...

I've never heard of the reporter role either though - so that might be some of the confusion

[IH]

unvote

What exactly does your role do Panzer?

This is extremely important

[klebian]

Guys, he's obviously claiming to be responsible for this in post 328:

Everybody gets up to read the

two headlines in the paper of the day:

"DR. Gordon Lancaster dies from stab wounds."

"PookytheMagicalBear has broken the world record for largest collection of knives."

...

Also noted in the obituaries: Aaron Bannister, played by PookyTheMagicalBear. He was also part of the town.

...

However, why was there no report this morning?

[IH]

I believe Panzer is innocent, by the way, but I need him to answer my question, as he can interact with my role.

[PJ.]

I can investigate things during the day when I'm out of the hospital that happened at night and I can put 2 headlines at night to be shown in the mourning. I never investigated Pooky, just had a feeling and Felt my feelings were off therefore I never put a report in again. The Lancaster thing was related to my being in the hospital the extra day. I was informed of this through PM. I investigated a death today but didn't get anything.