Micro 905: High Noon (GAME TERMINATED)

Lovebird · Post Post #475 (ISO) » Thu Dec 05, 2019 9:51 am

Quantifiable Conundrum (L-2)

: Amrun, Fishy Logic

Lovebird (L-3)

: Quantifiable Conundrum

RadiantCowbells, GuiltyLion, Dannflor, Lovebird

In post 471, Dannflor wrote:Why no mention of me Lovebird

IDK what to think about you.

Lovebird · Post Post #476 (ISO) » Thu Dec 05, 2019 9:54 am

In post 470, RadiantCowbells wrote:I feel like everything you're saying 'makes sense' as a reason that scumread me but that you wouldn't scumread me for them in the context of this game.

Why?

In post 472, RadiantCowbells wrote:Like calling me out for a frustration hammer and at least frustration related duel as 'not trying to solve the game' doesn't feel like a real thought process, it feels like you're just trying to use the Eth0s lynch against me

Why I'd try to lynch you? I wouldn't do that as scum. I think you know that, too

Lovebird · Post Post #477 (ISO) » Thu Dec 05, 2019 9:55 am

In post 455, Lovebird wrote:RC, you read his newbie game?

Fishy Logic · Post Post #478 (ISO) » Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:34 pm

In post 466, Amrun wrote:
In post 463, Lovebird wrote:
In post 460, Amrun wrote:
In post 447, Lovebird wrote:
In post 275, Amrun wrote:
Radiant Cowbells (L-4)
: noone

eth0s (L-3)
: GuiltyLion

Amrun, Dannflor, Lovebird, Fishy Logic, Quantifiable Conundrum
Can two duels even happen simultaneously? This is getting out of hand. At least this duel is pretty good.
Scummy post from amrun
In what way?
It's an empty comment.
Sure it is. It does at least state that the duel contains a scumread for me. It’s less empty than 90% of your ISO. I have plenty of content. This is a stretch.

Which duel had a scumread in it? Who's the scum read?

Amrun · Post Post #479 (ISO) » Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:57 pm

In post 478, Fishy Logic wrote:
In post 466, Amrun wrote:
In post 463, Lovebird wrote:
In post 460, Amrun wrote:
In post 447, Lovebird wrote:
In post 275, Amrun wrote:
Radiant Cowbells (L-4)
: noone

eth0s (L-3)
: GuiltyLion

Amrun, Dannflor, Lovebird, Fishy Logic, Quantifiable Conundrum
Can two duels even happen simultaneously? This is getting out of hand. At least this duel is pretty good.
Scummy post from amrun
In what way?
It's an empty comment.
Sure it is. It does at least state that the duel contains a scumread for me. It’s less empty than 90% of your ISO. I have plenty of content. This is a stretch.
Which duel had a scumread in it? Who's the scum read?

Very, very clearly, the RC/eth0s duel with eth0s as the scumread.

I didn’t develop my QC scumread until well after the duel that involved him.

Dannflor · Post Post #480 (ISO) » Thu Dec 05, 2019 2:01 pm

In post 475, Lovebird wrote:
Quantifiable Conundrum (L-2)
: Amrun, Fishy Logic

Lovebird (L-3)
: Quantifiable Conundrum

RadiantCowbells, GuiltyLion, Dannflor, Lovebird
In post 471, Dannflor wrote:Why no mention of me Lovebird
IDK what to think about you.

Did you wanna try and change that or

Dannflor · Post Post #481 (ISO) » Thu Dec 05, 2019 2:06 pm

RC's solve are the two lowest posters which I wouldn't be too surprised if exactly correct just because of how weird the game state has been since the start of the game. Especially if QC is town, then we've probably had two TvT duels in a row which means scum haven't been obligated to do anything.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #482 (ISO) » Thu Dec 05, 2019 2:07 pm

I've found that almost universally if I fail to have a confident scumread it's because scum weren't posting

Lovebird · Post Post #483 (ISO) » Thu Dec 05, 2019 2:18 pm

In post 480, Dannflor wrote:
In post 475, Lovebird wrote:
Quantifiable Conundrum (L-2)
: Amrun, Fishy Logic

Lovebird (L-3)
: Quantifiable Conundrum

RadiantCowbells, GuiltyLion, Dannflor, Lovebird
In post 471, Dannflor wrote:Why no mention of me Lovebird
IDK what to think about you.
Did you wanna try and change that or

I'm not worried, I guess. And, I'm not the best at asking questions to figure people out. So, I thought I'd see what you do.

Lovebird · Post Post #484 (ISO) » Thu Dec 05, 2019 2:20 pm

Ah, I really don't think town will win this time.

Oh well

Dannflor · Post Post #485 (ISO) » Thu Dec 05, 2019 2:21 pm

Who is scum, Lovebird?

Lovebird · Post Post #486 (ISO) » Thu Dec 05, 2019 2:21 pm

QC and RC, I think.

Dannflor · Post Post #487 (ISO) » Thu Dec 05, 2019 2:22 pm

Why is QC scum and yet people are also scum reading them for bad reasons?

Lovebird · Post Post #488 (ISO) » Thu Dec 05, 2019 2:23 pm

In post 452, Lovebird wrote:People scumread QC for bad reasons, I think. IDK, it all seems too surface. Like, too scummy to be scum. Things scum wouldn't do.

In post 453, Lovebird wrote:Oh, maybe not. His newbie games looks different. Maybe he's scum.

In post 454, Lovebird wrote:Ya, I changed my mind. I think he's scum.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #489 (ISO) » Thu Dec 05, 2019 2:26 pm

I know I'm town

Who else is his scumbuddy lovebird

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #490 (ISO) » Thu Dec 05, 2019 2:28 pm

Right now if we lynched him and he flipped scum my first inclination would be to say that you're his buddy and you changed your mind and decided to bus him. The fact that he hasn't made a single effortpost in a long time doesn't help that

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #491 (ISO) » Thu Dec 05, 2019 2:30 pm

I'm not feeling a town win here either

Lovebird · Post Post #492 (ISO) » Thu Dec 05, 2019 2:31 pm

In post 489, RadiantCowbells wrote:I know I'm town

Who else is his scumbuddy lovebird

IDK. Maybe Dan, or GL. But, I think it's you.

In post 490, RadiantCowbells wrote:Right now if we lynched him and he flipped scum my first inclination would be to say that you're his buddy and you changed your mind and decided to bus him. The fact that he hasn't made a single effortpost in a long time doesn't help that

I don't think I would bus him. And, I'm town, and I think you know I'm town.

Lovebird · Post Post #493 (ISO) » Thu Dec 05, 2019 2:48 pm

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #494 (ISO) » Thu Dec 05, 2019 2:57 pm

I don't townread you and I'm town.

If you're town it shouldn't be a struggle to show me that but trying to bully me into townreading you or deciding that I must be townreading you at x point in the game is not going to do anything for me or you. I as scum would not misread you in this game because it looks horrible and I don't need to look any worse than I do after Eth0s. But you're really not giving me a whole lot to go on.

I'll read QCs meta tomorrow night.

Lovebird · Post Post #495 (ISO) » Thu Dec 05, 2019 3:00 pm

I'm not bullying you.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #496 (ISO) » Thu Dec 05, 2019 3:01 pm

I feel bullied when you say shit like "I think you know that I'm town here" which implies that I'm scum for not townreading you

Lovebird · Post Post #497 (ISO) » Thu Dec 05, 2019 3:01 pm

In post 494, RadiantCowbells wrote:I as scum would not misread you in this game because it looks horrible and I don't need to look any worse than I do after Eth0s.

Anyone here expects you to read me town, except me?

Lovebird · Post Post #498 (ISO) » Thu Dec 05, 2019 3:02 pm

In post 496, RadiantCowbells wrote:I feel bullied when you say shit like "I think you know that I'm town here" which implies that I'm scum for not townreading you

Sorry.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #499 (ISO) » Thu Dec 05, 2019 3:02 pm

If I pushed you as scum I would reasonably expect you to point out that I have an insane track record reading you to the point of fakeclaiming Mason's with you, no?