Mafia 398: Triad - Over

Twito · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:39 am

The fking scum always trying the old distancing trick in the beginning.

ShadowLurker · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:42 am

The "Second" Vote Count

Nai

(2) - Simenon, Jack

Germy

(1) - Mariyta,

Sage

(1) - KaleiÐoscøpe

Mariyta

(1) - omg_im_innocent_wtf

omg_im_innocent_wtf

(1) - Twito

Not Voting

(6) - StallingChamp, Max, Nai, germy, Eon, Sage

StallingChamp has picked up his role PM but has not confirmed, he has been autoprodded.

With 12 alive, it is 7 to lynch!

Twito · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:45 am

ShadowLurker wrote:
The "Second" Vote Count

Coming Soon!

Cool! Can't wait!
Let us know before you post it will you?

Jack · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:33 pm

Nai wrote:And your posting style smells of a guy trying to be active while providing absolutely nothing to the game. Now that we both know our olfactory glands are working...

The game has to start somehow yo

Sage · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Mon Jan 15, 2007 6:19 pm

Let's start by lynching Jack!

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2007 1:41 am

Now both points are irrelevant as they're reacting to each other to attempt on an active game

The fking scum always trying the old distancing trick in the beginning.

I don't look at it this way as the discussion they provided so far doesn't specificly distanciate them from each other. Especially the points they provide isn't a point that would distanciate them.

My vote stays on Sage before he retracts his mum joke

Twito · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2007 5:21 am

I have to learn to add smiley face whenever I make a joke.
Listed this game as boring.. Another one requires all my attention.
But the game is on!
Wouldn't it be nice to start the day with a bandwagon?

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2007 6:41 am

Not without a good reason...

Twito · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2007 7:23 am

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]Not without a good reason...[/quote]
But they are so much more fun without a reason..

Twito · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2007 7:26 am

MOD

that votecount is not correct. I believe I'm still voting omg_im_innocent_wtf.

Mariyta · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2007 7:31 am

Twito wrote:Wouldn't it be nice to start the day with a bandwagon?

Ask and you shall receive.

Unvote, Vote Twito

Twito · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2007 7:35 am

Mariyta wrote:
Twito wrote:Wouldn't it be nice to start the day with a bandwagon?
Ask and you shall receive.

Unvote, Vote Twito

I knew we would get a bandwagon if I only asked nicely for it

Now what about moving to someone else, please <3
The thing is I highly prefer bandwagoning over being bandwagoned. I dunno why that's just the way it is. But I guess you can't have everything and bandwagon on me is always better than no bandwagon at all.

germy · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:02 am

Fascinating. I return from a three day weekend to discover all sorts of juicy arguments.

Still not voting until everyone has posted.

Those left, I believe:

StallingChamp
Eon
Max

Prediction of my behavior for this game:

I'm not fond of Twito's style, and may focus too much on him in the future. Sorry, just a little too aggressive and hostile for my personal taste.

Jack's comment about Nai is exactly the kind of logic I am used to, and might tend to agree with him in the future.

Although I appreciate (and usually recognize) the use of humor, I don't often see it as helpful to the game, especially when one cannot tell if a player is ever serious or joking. I don't condone its regular use.

Current thoughts:

Just because my personal preference leans away from Twito and toward Jack does not mean I think one is scum and not the other: although I will likely remain more suspicious of players like Twito, in general.

I think Nai made a negligent comment, and Jack is reacting to it. I don't see the argument, or even Jack's vote for Nai, as especially serious.

It's impossible for me to get a read on Twito and Sage.

Kaleidoscope seems to be waffling on the "argument" between Nai and Jack. "Nai is right, but I can understand Jack, as well." This seems to me the most "actively" suspicious so far, as oppossed to the "passive" suspiciousness I find with the jokesters.

Mariyta · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:49 am

Ok, everyone. For germy's benefit, if you're joking, put

******JOKING******

before or after the post.

*********JOKING**********

Sage · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:57 am

In my experience, players who get frustrated when nobody gets their "jokes" are mafia.

I'd vote Twito, but I'm unsure how many votes he has on him right now.

Twito · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2007 11:34 am

Sage wrote:In my experience, players who get frustrated when nobody gets their "jokes" are mafia.

I'd vote Twito, but I'm unsure how many votes he has on him right now.

Never seen that happening and your logic doesn't make any sence.
All that looks like as an attempt to bandwagon.
I believe I only have 2 votes.
I'm pretty sure you are dirty mafia scumbag.

Vote: Sage

Twito · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2007 11:34 am

Unvote
Vote: Sage

Twito · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2007 11:41 am

Mariyta wrote:Ok, everyone. For germy's benefit, if you're joking, put
******JOKING******
before or after the post.

*********JOKING**********

I like your way of playing.
Also lets stick to short posts shall we?

Sage · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:53 pm

We need some sort of serious bandwagon to start things off, don't we? Maybe you haven't seen it before, but I have. At this point, that's enough for me to go on. Better, I think, than sitting around doing nothing.

I made no mention of logic, only of "in my experience." Care to point out where I used logic and how it was faulty? :p

Twito · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2007 4:22 pm

Sage wrote:We need some sort of serious bandwagon to start things off, don't we? Maybe you haven't seen it before, but I have. At this point, that's enough for me to go on. Better, I think, than sitting around doing nothing.

I made no mention of logic, only of "in my experience." Care to point out where I used logic and how it was faulty? :p

It's not correct thing to say?

Bandwagon is one good way to start. There are many others aswell though..

Sage · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2007 6:02 pm

Your suggestion?

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2007 9:00 pm

Twito wrote:
Sage wrote:In my experience, players who get frustrated when nobody gets their "jokes" are mafia.

I'd vote Twito, but I'm unsure how many votes he has on him right now.
Never seen that happening and your logic doesn't make any sence.
All that looks like as an attempt to bandwagon.
I believe I only have 2 votes.
I'm pretty sure you are dirty mafia scumbag.

Vote: Sage

What is this? "you vote me, i'm town, so you must be scum logic?"

Seriously, this is a really agressive reaction towards such a minor yet unimportant comment. This is in my eyes, very scummy.

Unvote:
Vote: Twito

Twito · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Wed Jan 17, 2007 6:52 am

Sage wrote:Your suggestion?

I tried another approach on another game just now. On this one I've already suggested bandwagon.

InReplyTo kalei
It's the small things that make the big fat scum.

germy · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Wed Jan 17, 2007 7:05 am

Can we get a prod for Eon and Max, as well?

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:15 am

Twito wrote:It's the small things that make the big fat scum.

Oh come on now. Everyone knows that if he tries to pull out a lynch on such things people will attack him for that. Your reaction would've only been plausible if a vote was attached to it. Otherwise, your reaction was way over the top, which it is in my opinion (hence the vote).