Open 801: Trust Fall (Game Over)

[Equinox]

Trust Count 1.02

Not Trusting (10) - Akarin, Fidget, Hectic, Jake The Wolfie, Necessary Sneasel, PookyTheMagicalBear, Rainbow Reads, Rockhopper, shellyc, Uncrowned

The deadline is Sunday, December 6, 2020, at 7:30 PM EST (UTC-5), which is in (expired on 2020-12-06 19:30:00).

Moderator Note

As a reminder, the notation for trusting is

I trust X

.

[Akarin]

Hooray! We've officially made it twice as far as the last run of this setup without anyone Trusting Mafia!

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

Jake does Lady Akarin's affection mean nothing to you?

[Akarin]

As a reminder, the notation for trusting is I trust X.

Yeah, I was not intending those to be

TRUST

if that's directed at me.

[shellyc]

What if each of us names 2 players other than ourselves, like a pseudo-vote thing.
Then after a certain point, the 2 players named most often have to pair off.
So like the same concept as RVS wagons basically, but we flip 2 people.

hmmm

i don't think leashing is that good of an idea tbh, scum getting a say through leashing may be dangerous

i think there's very slight +town equity to proposing these mech approaches (granted mechtalk is an easy way to get cred as scum) but its bold/new

[Jake The Wolfie]

Jake does Lady Akarin's affection mean nothing to you?

I am a Suicidal Jester, who wants to die.

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

I think an Akarin-Jake pairing would be good :3

[shellyc]

tbh i think the jake proposing is quite bold to come from scum as well - its arguably the first eye-catching thing that has happened this game

[shellyc]

*from akarin

[Akarin]

i don't think leashing is that good of an idea tbh, scum getting a say through leashing may be dangerous

Scum getting a say gives us something to read associatives from though.

[Uncrowned]

I think pairing me with another townie would be optimal game strategy as that would mean we get 2 people closer to winning the game for town.

Thoughts?

[Akarin]

For the record, I didn't mean leashing the mechanic

all game

on that either, just the first leave-pair.

[Akarin]

I am a Suicidal Jester, who wants to die.

Well you're in the right game for it...

[Akarin]

Uncrowned seems so trustworthy...

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

Uncrowned Jake?

[Rockhopper]

i think there's very slight +town equity to proposing these mech approaches (granted mechtalk is an easy way to get cred as scum) but its bold/new

ok but didn't she say it was an idea from the previous iteration?

[shellyc]

i think there's very slight +town equity to proposing these mech approaches (granted mechtalk is an easy way to get cred as scum) but its bold/new

ok but didn't she say it was an idea from the previous iteration?

it wasn't implemented

[shellyc]

i don't think leashing is that good of an idea tbh, scum getting a say through leashing may be dangerous

Scum getting a say gives us something to read associatives from though.

scum posting gives us something to read associatives from

1st pass mayyyybe i'd be fine with, but not full game

[Jake The Wolfie]

tbh i think the jake proposing is quite bold to come from scum as well - its arguably the first eye-catching thing that has happened this game

Can you explain this?

[Jake The Wolfie]

nice

[Fidget]

What if each of us names 2 players other than ourselves, like a pseudo-vote thing.
Then after a certain point, the 2 players named most often have to pair off.
So like the same concept as RVS wagons basically, but we flip 2 people.

hmmm

i don't think leashing is that good of an idea tbh, scum getting a say through leashing may be dangerous

i think there's very slight +town equity to proposing these mech approaches (granted mechtalk is an easy way to get cred as scum) but its bold/new

Scum might get slightly more agency, but I feel as if having votes of some kind to go off of would be useful for getting reads. I'm sure things will get better as stuff happens but without votes I feel a little unsure of what to talk about.

[Uncrowned]

Uncrowned Jake?

Hey. I said tie me within a townie player.

[Rockhopper]

What if each of us names 2 players other than ourselves, like a pseudo-vote thing.
Then after a certain point, the 2 players named most often have to pair off.
So like the same concept as RVS wagons basically, but we flip 2 people.

hmmm

i don't think leashing is that good of an idea tbh, scum getting a say through leashing may be dangerous

i think there's very slight +town equity to proposing these mech approaches (granted mechtalk is an easy way to get cred as scum) but its bold/new

Scum might get slightly more agency, but I feel as if having votes of some kind to go off of would be useful for getting reads. I'm sure things will get better as stuff happens but without votes I feel a little unsure of what to talk about.

alr VOTE: shellcy
her townhunting techniques look a tad bit ingenuine

[Akarin]

Hey. I said tie me within a townie player.

You scumread Jake?

[Rockhopper]

#72 implies
HEAL: akarin
HEAL: jake