In post 524, Kmd4390 wrote:
I personally think you and your scumbuddy didn't think to look at the wagon and killed robo out of fear that he'd lead the town to a lynch on scum. And now that I look back at robo's ISO at the end of Day 2, I'm pretty sure he'd have come after you and/or chaos. So if a robo kill was an attempt to set you up, it's a pretty piss poor attempt because they could have just left robo alive and let him come after you.
I am not that dumb, especially considering my first game I played on site I was scum and made a similar mistake of lynching town on the wagon I was on, although not quite as drastic as what you are trying to do, it led to problems. I know how to learn from my mistakes. Post #301 from Newbie 1262 was what I learned from night killing a townie on the wagon, so I am very aware of what happens with wagon analysis.
This was Robo's only post about me Day 2, and if I recall correctly, his Day 1 posts were off and on, but I know he did place me in his town list a few times.
In post 450, Robocopter87 wrote:I retract my statement about wanting CO dead.
Due to abstas last post, I want him dead very much so.
Prohawk continues to be a hard read due to the fact that I don't know if he is inexperienced or just overlogical or what he is. Leaning scummy though, especially the part about the swearing.
I don't know about you, but I honestly don't find it the least bit threatening. Leaning scummy? I have been accused of much worse by more people than Robo. If I wanted to kill anyone that was threatening me it would have been Chaos.
And yes, you intentionally implicated yourself because it was the only way for you to build a strong case to implicate me as scum. If you would have left Robo, then it would not have been so cut and dry with three people on the wagon. You couldn't have your scumbuddy make the case because he wouldn't be able to vouch for your alignment. Therefore, implicating yourself would be the only way to pull it off.