Being generous there are four states in essence one could view someone: scum, town, neutral, or null.
Zwet's statement eliminates the possibility of scum.
By the nature of stating he doesn't agree with the read it implies there is a read of his own which eliminates the possibility of null.
So, we're left with: town or neutral.
1.) In the case Zwet thinks Pom is town:
This is proposing to lynch a player you find town. This is scummy ex machina. This is lynchworthy. (I think it was this case but lets be thourough)
2.) In the case Zwet thinks Pom is neutral:
You are proposing a lynch of a neutral player for "information". On top of the visceral response of an informational lynch is silly (all lynches provide information) and the timing being wrong (day 1 is not really going to be a good time for an informational lynch) and it being an open setup (eliminating one area of "information" to be gained) -
In the cases when one is going to lynch for information it, assumably, would be to find scum. If the case is bogus, as he said, what is gained from this?
So, in one case its a contradiction. In the other it just absolutely makes little sense.
I think that it was case 1 and a classic OOPS. Even if case 2 I'm calling shenanigans.