I did actually comment on camn's vote. See first content post.ChannelDelibird wrote:Re: Scien -
The 'pressure vote'. Why did you (Ojanen) make such a thing of this, yet not even comment (as far as I recall) on the fact that camn's Raivann vote was also announced as a pressure vote? Sure, camn's pressure vote carried an explanation of what she wanted to happen as a result of the vote, but so did Scien's, no?
Camn's vote put Raivann to L-1, also pressured A&A heavily and had a threat.
That is a very different tone and L-1 wagon situation.camn wrote:Now, Raivann, if you fail to comply I will start pushing your lynch on the grounds of UNHELPFUL. I believe I can succeed. So please, if you ARE town, start being helpful.
Hmm. Excuse me but this looks fishy to me.CDB wrote: With the deadline, I'll obviously only consider voting for one of these, which meansI will have to leave the Ojanen vote for tomorrow. With that in mind, a Scien vote might be the way to go, as that might help me make a decision on Ojanen tomorrow. I don't think I would want to lynch camn over Dogmeat or Scien at this stage, and since ASH has flaked rather than lurked, maybe Scien is the right move today. As I say, I don't really see Scien/Ojanen scumteam, so this may well be the most informative lynch for me.
If you're scum and Scien isn't, that looks really strongly like setting lynches up.
The mere argument about decision based on me not having votes is odd when noone else had a bandwagon either and there's plenty of suspicion for me flying around.