Mate, I always think outside the box. Let's say we have a Hider (obviously that's NOT a claim or a crumb, because if I was I would have just shut up and went on with my plan without having to needlessly draw attention to my slot)..In post 572, insomnia wrote:We have 7 whispers per dayphase
being suicidal isnt cool or funIn post 428, ObviousScum wrote:Rich that the guy arguing to policy inno someone on trial is saying I'm the squareIn post 423, TrueSoulHustler wrote: it was an obvious joooooooooke
ur such a squareeeeeee
youd have my vote if it werent for this bloody trial
-mm
Like you realize you're arguing to play this bastard game in the most boring manner possible right?
It will make them lynchproof for the rest of the day. Which shouldn't matter as far as I'm concerned.In post 585, TrueSoulHustler wrote:does the person on trial being declared innocent make them lynchproof?
ive heard that thrown around and if so im probably changing my vote to abstain
-mm
theres nothing to learn in the first placeIn post 441, ObviousScum wrote:Yeah because if you loudly announce that they should be inno'd on policy then we learn literally nothing from the vote
You're acting like I was dead set on the guy getting lynched when the main thing I have said is that people should bother thinking about it before making him unlynchable
I kinda don't think korina gambits by putting his recruiter on trial in the first 24 hours just to make him unlynchable but given this was an opportunity to see who would actually vote guilty we could have gotten some actual content out of the vote, now it will probably be uninformative
cry moreIn post 455, Very cool and not mafia wrote:what the hell 19 pages i thought this was mafiascum
Right! Totally forgot about the Last Will.In post 579, Rautherdir wrote:Or they could send the whispers the following day, and have their Last Will hold their targets in case they die.
See, this game has both Whispers and Last Wills.
At the moment primarily the fact that Norwee is being overly defensive in responding to my points and misrepresented my position in a way that I don't particularly see coming from townIn post 576, Minstrel wrote:Obum's a weird one. I've reread him and he's very strongly opinionated about not policy Innocenting this, which is fair enough I guess, since that defeats the entire purpose of gaining info from it. Norwee and I are obviously biased though, and we can't help but feel scum are gonna be strongly incentived to guilty this, which will tip the favour in the voting.
I think the correct play is to vote Not Guilty if you're not sure about us, or townread us, and vote Guilty if you think we're scum, but reasons would be nice.
Obum and insominia: Why are you scumreading us?
-Hectic
am I being made fun of tbhIn post 597, ObviousScum wrote:At the moment primarily the fact that Norwee is being overly defensive in responding to my points and misrepresented my position in a way that I don't particularly see coming from townIn post 576, Minstrel wrote:Obum's a weird one. I've reread him and he's very strongly opinionated about not policy Innocenting this, which is fair enough I guess, since that defeats the entire purpose of gaining info from it. Norwee and I are obviously biased though, and we can't help but feel scum are gonna be strongly incentived to guilty this, which will tip the favour in the voting.
I think the correct play is to vote Not Guilty if you're not sure about us, or townread us, and vote Guilty if you think we're scum, but reasons would be nice.
Obum and insominia: Why are you scumreading us?
-Hectic
Your tone is a lot better "tbh"
