unvote, vote dramonic
Too make our little plan move forward.
ryan... we have 6 people right now... actually, it benefits both SK and scum to kill the other killing role and go to a 4 person milo (mislynch and lose) and totally avoid being night killed by the other scum faction.
Have you read my reasoning that says that Dramonic and Scott can't both be evil?
Ok... ryan... your posts are, allow me to say, FULL OF BULLSHIT.
Thank you...
Again... you seem to have missed every post where I DEMANDED that the vig who had killed TP Barnum to come forward.ryan2754 wrote:Looking back over it, if no one has claimed redirecter/bus driver, I definitely DO NOT BELIEVE Scott's Claim. He says he was Even Night Vig. Do people really beleive this?
Vig BOLDED request
2nd requestAlexhans wrote:Look, there hasn't been any town claims so we could afford one to discover the truth so I think that it would be a good idea to have a vig claim if he there is one and tell us who he killed.
Another oneAlexhans wrote: I think many people are leaning heavily on scum left. That's why I would like a VIG claim to know for sure.
didn't you think about saying anything then?Alexhans wrote: IF it is indeed a vig kill... I don't understand why said vig doesn't claim so we that know what to look for.
Alexhans wrote:Mixed feelings. I didn't want a vig who didn't issue the kill out. I wanted, if there is one, the one that DID. That would make it likely that there is one scum partner left. Anyway, I trust scott's claim and think that there is NO odd night vig (even though he assumed there was one). So, I think there is an SK.
ohhhh!!!! some one is DIRTY!!!Ryan wrote: I see him more likely as the final scum, who killed both SJ and Stef, and is trying to get a double kill by SAYING "I vigged and he blocked it." Seeing as well, I don't have that role, we it seems obvious.
YOU JUST SAID THAT YOU THINK SCOTT IS THE REMAINING SCUM??? AND HE KILLED SJ AND STEF? Why were you voting dramonic then? let me ask you something... who killed Panzer? Weren't you a 1-shot-vig? ah... nothing fits when you fake claim early eh?
No dice. You're not gonna direct another lynch that is not you or Dramonic.Ryan wrote: Seeing as I am damned if I do or don't, I am still willing to hammer dramonic. Let it be said, I think SB is the final scum.
ryan ISO 15 wrote: Well it's nice the rolecop was taken out. I see we have an SK/Vig based on the stabbing.
ryan ISO 32 wrote: 4.) What is your feeling on Scott's even night vig claim? Do you still think the other vig should out himself?
So your point is? That we lynch you directly without lynching dramonic? or this is one of those scum gambyts too appear town?ryan ISO 33 wrote:The fact you apparently suspected Scott but later went for a claimed bomb is a good scum move... because an alive town bomb would affect your killing and lynching choices.ryan ISO 27 wrote: SK Analysis. Pretty much what I did was re-read and see if there is anything that may denote SK behavior towards the PT Barnum kill.ryan2754 wrote:Oh and by the way, my analysis of Hero as town was earlier in the game. People's opinions and actions nchange. Alex brought up a good point though - I could see dramonic as SK.Wow... and you feel worthy to mention it NOW???? odd... AND FRIGGING scummy.ryan2754 wrote:
Given the current game status, I am going to claim. I am a One-Shot Vigilante. I Vigged PT Barnum N1.
Who cares what are your alledged reasons? And they seem pretty forced... you would actually have confidence in yourself and save that vote...ryan2754 wrote:
Well, I looked at it this way: As a One-Shot Vig, I have always been prone to make my Vig kill earlier rather than later, given that earlier, if I accidently shoot town, it has a lesser effect on the game, whereas if I One-Shot Vig later, it screws with the dynamics of the game and the situations of lylo much more than earlier.riiight... because that was gonna happen... with already ONE outed vig...ryan2754 wrote:
Why did I wait to claim? To see if anyone eventually may have claimed the PT Kill other than myself.
well... here it all lies in trusting one or the other...ryan2754 wrote:
Personally, I don't like how Scott is CONVINCED I roleblocked him. Because, well, I didn't, and I am as much out of the loop as everyone else is. Given that he claims to have hit me, I beleive him to be lying, and is concocting this idea of me as a redirector to can another town aligned player. And well, it is working.
And I'm much more willing to trust a claimed vig who DIDNT issue the n1 kill and still claimed when I asked than a supposed vig that claims when he sees no way out and feels about to be lynched.Ok... let me get this straight... you were all for lynching Dramonic... but when you have the ultimate responsability you suddenly get jeepers and try to weasel your way out? it doesn't work like that...ryan2754 wrote:
Given, the current situation ,let's look at it this way:
1.) I hammer dramonic, and either we get a bad guy, or two town players are lost. That puts us at possible end game or possible lylo next round after night actions. Town (myself included) has a lesser chance of winning if he has a correct claim (not to mention an extremely weird set up). Also, it would be a high risk, high reward scenario.ryan2754 wrote:
2.) I don't hammer dramonic, and I get lynched (since everyone wants it to happen). We keep a potential "bomb," who could ride it to victory. One town player lost, but a better chance of town winning (statistically).
PS: This post might or might not be messy... I am working on a college project at 2:35 in the morning... it is due tomorrow... I decided to take a little break to clear my mind and guess what? It worked... I solved a big checkpoint I couldn't bypass...
Thanks Ryan for being so scummy!
