I'll just start by saying I answered the first one because I don't think that asking one loaded question the way he did isIn post 672, Mjollnir wrote:How were those questions even loaded anyway? You even answered one of them.
Without wishing to deflect, I find it curious how you feel the need to get me to explain what I feel his motivation was for asking these questions, but you'd rather go off on a long hypobolic spiel about how awful the questions were than maybe ask the source itself why he is asking those questions and what possible town motivation he may have for this.In post 677, Nosferatu wrote:So as to not completely dodge the question, I'll ask you, what does moz gain from asking me those questions?
moz isn't the one that had a problem with me calling his questions loaded lolIn post 681, Mjollnir wrote:Without wishing to deflect, I find it curious how you feel the need to get me to explain what I feel his motivation was for asking these questions, but you'd rather go off on a long hypobolic spiel about how awful the questions were than maybe ask the source itself why he is asking those questions and what possible town motivation he may have for this.In post 677, Nosferatu wrote:So as to not completely dodge the question, I'll ask you, what does moz gain from asking me those questions?
I am willing to put forth my answers but I feel I should check whether you want to present this to Mozamis first.
You're only voting because it's a wagon. Scummy as hell.
like shit like this how do you town read this?
I typically don't interact with my scumreads like that. idk why, it just doesn't occur to me.In post 685, Mjollnir wrote:It may be my bias with how I like to scumhunt, but I would have thought maybe you would have called him out directly to explain why he's asking those questions if you feel they are loaded rather than try and get a third part reaction to it, but I suppose I see what you are saying.
To the first question: How would I know ahead of time that setup spec would be a major talking point for ~10 pages? How would I be able to factor that into me wanting to sign up for the game? What answer could I give that would let him know that I'm scum? What's the town answer to that question?In post 685, Mjollnir wrote:It may be my bias with how I like to scumhunt, but I would have thought maybe you would have called him out directly to explain why he's asking those questions if you feel they are loaded rather than try and get a third part reaction to it, but I suppose I see what you are saying.
Anyway, as I have said you openly saying that you are disinterested in what is happening in the game instantly raises questions, it instantly makes you appear anti-town and means you will most likely be a talking point for the next couple of pages at least. Given how unusual the move is it seems only natural to ask why you signed up when you show an active disinterest in the game to try and work out what the reasoning behind you being unwilling to try and at least look through the setup spec for stuff you can scumhunt with, it doesn't take a lot of effort to just ignore certain posts after all.
The question about your reads is more obvious and I have no idea how this could be construed as a loaded question, it's a standard question from what I can see, asking if you've happened to see anything at least. If a player hasn't contributed at all I like to ask them what their reads are so if they are scum they can't simply fencesit, they have to show some level of commitment and have to choose how to read their buddies and why.
lol that blows Freud/Jung out the waterIn post 657, Chickadee wrote:Autocorrect
lol as i wrote that i wondered if:In post 669, Nosferatu wrote:complexes are more of a Jung thing aren't they?
scum vote?
What question? and I'll only respond to a question that has no snark.In post 691, Nosferatu wrote:Wanna hear moz's answer as to what he wanted.