i don't know how to read you like at all. :<In post 701, Firebringer wrote:I feel like I can easy sort u if you gave ur thoughts on me chars and kind of wondering why u haven’t but I guess u just don’t care about little old bringer of fire
no, no, put it back.
actually i can townread this today. PoE continues.In post 701, Firebringer wrote:I feel like I can easy sort u if you gave ur thoughts on me chars and kind of wondering why u haven’t but I guess u just don’t care about little old bringer of fire
how can anyone be pretty confident that aristophanes is town? he made one nullscum post saying he'll catch up later. barring some outside thread information this doesn't feel like something town would think. doesn't 'buy' anyone that's confident mulch is town... while strong townreading a 1 poster?In post 523, implosion wrote:I'm at work and shouldn't actually be posting in the first place and am probably going to limit the amount that i let this distract me.
I'm pretty confident that this is town-Transcend, and I have a not-bad track record of reading him iirc.
It's town keely and town aristophanes as well. Pretty confident in those three.
I don't buy anyone who claims to have a strong read on mulch yet but would happily vote him purely for game meta (and I don't think he's done anything he isn't capable of faking yet, at least that I've seen), and cabd's first reads post is as other people have already pointed out really sketchy.
Gonna wait until I can actually read the whole thing after work as opposed to half-skim-half-reading half of the pages. I also would love some justification from anyone who townread Ginngie so far (particularly from cabd).
Scummy how? Anyone on the wagon can answer this.In post 710, Mulch wrote:We were policy lynching CABD today anyway, but on the plus side they are actually scummy
playing it safe yo
i do agree he's "sensible". that's part of the problem. he's only taking a stand on points he can defend logically, like going after contradictions with Mulch and staging a test Mulch didn't give the right answer to. he's been changing course too quickly, and while that isn't scummy in and of itself, that he's directed his attention away from Mulch to me, and then Cabd, gives me the feeling he's just looking for a position he's able to properly defend.In post 598, Kagami wrote:I think his reads and positions are sensible and the manner with which he's interpreting posts doesn't seem tainted by knowledge that the target is town. It seems like he's picking a lot of fights that are reasonably likely to go poorly for him, where there was lots of low-hanging fruit elsewhere.In post 593, Chara wrote: Kagami: could you take a stab at convincing me why Transcend isn't scum?
Their post seemed really shallow and pocketyIn post 713, Kmd4390 wrote:Scummy how? Anyone on the wagon can answer this.In post 710, Mulch wrote:We were policy lynching CABD today anyway, but on the plus side they are actually scummy
I'm not on the wagon. I think saying mulch is town because he is being a dick is a fake thought, and I don't like their other reads or how they approached anything this game.In post 713, Kmd4390 wrote:Scummy how? Anyone on the wagon can answer this.In post 710, Mulch wrote:We were policy lynching CABD today anyway, but on the plus side they are actually scummy
Why?speaking of low hanging fruit, I'd absolutely lynch aristophanes and don't care that his flip gives 'no information'.
what's your experience with Fire?In post 719, Kmd4390 wrote:Firebringer, North feels you are fluffing too much so I ISOd you and can find a total of five reads and zero legit reasons. Can you back up the reads you've posted and give a few more?
the one time I saw ari as scum he didn't even post so I'm taking it as actually alignment indicative.In post 720, Chara wrote:Toranaga: so why do you want to lynch him? his only post is about as NAI as it gets.
I've seen him in the "stop getting banned" thread.In post 722, Chara wrote:what's your experience with Fire?In post 719, Kmd4390 wrote:Firebringer, North feels you are fluffing too much so I ISOd you and can find a total of five reads and zero legit reasons. Can you back up the reads you've posted and give a few more?