Beat replaces who in your thing?In post 691, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:No wait, is it Beat?
I agree Furitive is cult and has been cult since d1 though
Beat replaces who in your thing?In post 691, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:No wait, is it Beat?
In post 701, Korina wrote:Also Furitive is never CL here IMO
These two posts do not make any sense together.In post 702, Korina wrote:Like, if the game doesn’t end tomorrow, I want Furitive dead before endgame anyways
Furitive is cult-spewing and a cult flip would genuinely give more information than what Furitive’s providingIn post 704, Nathann wrote:In post 701, Korina wrote:Also Furitive is never CL here IMOThese two posts do not make any sense together.In post 702, Korina wrote:Like, if the game doesn’t end tomorrow, I want Furitive dead before endgame anyways
Jacket, Nathann and I claimed Vengeful.In post 707, Korina wrote:I actually don’t know who claimed vengeful but if Furtive was not one, they need to die before elo on the basis of - furtive wants a vengeful dead to get a prime out, and the repeated claiming of it could actually be cl.
If furtive did claim vengeful, cool, it’s w/e
It's not worth letting Cult grow their numbers.In post 706, Korina wrote:Furitive is cult-spewing and a cult flip would genuinely give more information than what Furitive’s providing
That is interesting.In post 715, Korina wrote:I didn’t read CL pm at all, or really the setup outside of prime cultists cause recruitment.
CL is aware on a no-elim they can recruit.
Beat as CL wanted to get a prime cultist killed d3 to recruit enchant and win via the no-elim idea, and make it seem like it’s a townie play ti *not* mention anything about that to town, but actually mention it to the rest of the cult
I'm literally baffled as to why people think I'm cult, aside from disagreeing on mechanics. I've tried to be active and give insight. I feel like the scapegoat for 1) desperate cultists and 2) towns not bothered enough to try.In post 703, Enchant wrote:1/5 chance now.
I think that it's because most people don't like your stance on limming Vengefuls which isn't very beneficial to Town.In post 718, furtiveglance wrote:I'm literally baffled as to why people think I'm cult, aside from disagreeing on mechanics. I've tried to be active and give insight. I feel like the scapegoat for 1) desperate cultists and 2) towns not bothered enough to try.In post 703, Enchant wrote:1/5 chance now.
CL is aware of that fact, and could reasonably assume governer can no-elimIn post 717, RH9 wrote:That is interesting.In post 715, Korina wrote:I didn’t read CL pm at all, or really the setup outside of prime cultists cause recruitment.
CL is aware on a no-elim they can recruit.
Beat as CL wanted to get a prime cultist killed d3 to recruit enchant and win via the no-elim idea, and make it seem like it’s a townie play ti *not* mention anything about that to town, but actually mention it to the rest of the cult
Beat did say that she didn't want Cult to know.
Because all I remember fromm you in this game is you wanna kill vengefuls which is not pro-townIn post 718, furtiveglance wrote:I'm literally baffled as to why people think I'm cult, aside from disagreeing on mechanics. I've tried to be active and give insight. I feel like the scapegoat for 1) desperate cultists and 2) towns not bothered enough to try.In post 703, Enchant wrote:1/5 chance now.
So you're saying that Beat pretended that Cult wouldn't know?In post 720, Korina wrote:CL is aware of that fact, and could reasonably assume governer can no-elimIn post 717, RH9 wrote:That is interesting.In post 715, Korina wrote:I didn’t read CL pm at all, or really the setup outside of prime cultists cause recruitment.
CL is aware on a no-elim they can recruit.
Beat as CL wanted to get a prime cultist killed d3 to recruit enchant and win via the no-elim idea, and make it seem like it’s a townie play ti *not* mention anything about that to town, but actually mention it to the rest of the cult
Beat did say that she didn't want Cult to know.
We have higher odds of hitting cult nowIn post 716, Nathann wrote:It's not worth letting Cult grow their numbers.In post 706, Korina wrote:Furitive is cult-spewing and a cult flip would genuinely give more information than what Furitive’s providing
Say you suddenly know furtive is Cult. What does that information tell you?
Yes, the entire tinfoil idea revolves around not saying it publicly to “prevent cult from knowing” is a ploy to get towncred, when the cl can reasonably assume governer can no-elimIn post 722, RH9 wrote:So you're saying that Beat pretended that Cult wouldn't know?In post 720, Korina wrote:CL is aware of that fact, and could reasonably assume governer can no-elimIn post 717, RH9 wrote:That is interesting.In post 715, Korina wrote:I didn’t read CL pm at all, or really the setup outside of prime cultists cause recruitment.
CL is aware on a no-elim they can recruit.
Beat as CL wanted to get a prime cultist killed d3 to recruit enchant and win via the no-elim idea, and make it seem like it’s a townie play ti *not* mention anything about that to town, but actually mention it to the rest of the cult
Beat did say that she didn't want Cult to know.