Newbie 774 - Spegezzironi: Game Over! TOWN WINS!

SensFan · Post Post #75 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:30 am

Lamont_Cranston wrote:Sensfan, do you think Johool's attack has anything to do with the fact that your vote was on ckool at all?

Not sure.

It was pretty obvious why I voted ckool, though.

sekinj · Post Post #76 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:30 am

Day 1: Vote Count 4

(# of votes against) Voted Player - by Voter(s)

(1) ckool5000 - by Lamont_Cranston
(2) Johoohno - by Rustythepirate, SensFan
(0) lailai - by none
(0) Lamont_Cranston - by Sotty7
(1) Perpetuum - by treeshavenotongues
(1) Rustythepirate - by Johoohno
(0) SensFan - by none
(0) Sotty7 - by none

(2) treeshavenotongues - by Perpetuum, ckool5000

Not Voting: lailai

With nine (9) citizens alive it takes

five (5) votes to lynch.

Day 1 Deadline: 5/09/09 12:00 PM CST

Mod Annoucements:
- lailai is V/LA from 4/18/09 through 4/19/09
- Day 1 deadline has been correct from 4/27/09 to 5/09/09 (3 weeks per day)

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #77 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:33 am

Welcome back Sotty. I find it odd you ask me a bunch of questions and then just vote for me without even waiting for the answers. I assume that it is a temporary vote just to get my attention huh?

Sotty7 wrote:
Lamont_Cranston Post 26 wrote:
Unvote, vote ckool

The dynamics have changed
Like?
Like my vote is more useful somewhere else.

Lamont_Cranston Post 28 wrote:In this case, a vote is worth a thousand words.
What do you mean by this post?
He had posted NO content & made a huge deal out of using random.org to choose his post FOR him thus alleviating any responsibility for his vote (supposedly).

Lamont_Cranston Post 33 wrote:I consider my vote pro-village.

Perpetuum, care to explain your vote for for tree?
Why do you consider that? You haven't explain your vote at all and you didn't answer Johoohno's question either.You have stated again that your vote is “pro-village” care to actually explain
why
?
My job is to find scum.

Unvote, vote: Lamont_Cranston

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #78 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:38 am

Sotty I think we can work together as village here. My opinion is that your vote is better placed where you had it; i.e. on ckool.

Since I have answered your questions, please put your vote back there.

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #79 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:43 am

EBWOP --> Sorry I mean to say "Since I have answered your questions

can you

please pur your vote back there.

ckool5000 · Post Post #80 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:43 am

unvote

My vote can be somewhere besides a random vote. I'm going to have to anaylize and make a big deal out of every post a little later, when I have some more time, but my thoughts right now are:

Sens: Fine by me.

Lamont: He seems very scummy to me. I mean, just look at the post right above this one!

Johoohno: I'm a little wary of him, especially considering what Sens said, but he seems okay.
Sotty: Seems very town to me. Obviously scum-hunting.

ckool5000: Well, he does... Wait... That's me.....

Rusty: Meh.

lailai: seriously should get a prod soon

everyone else: Fine by me.

Rustythepirate · Post Post #81 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 11:30 am

Unvote

Vote: Lamont_Cranston

ckool5000, what does meh mean? Is it different from "Fine by me"?

Lamont_Cranston wrote:He had posted NO content

Either had Sotty7, treeshavenotongues, Johoohno, Perpetuum, lailai, or even you. How much content do you expect from page 1?

Lamont_Cranston wrote:& made a huge deal out of using random.org

How did he make a huge deal out of it? All he did was make one post with his results from random.org.

Lamont_Cranston wrote:to choose his post FOR him thus alleviating any responsibility for his vote (supposedly).

It's the random voting stage. It's supposed to be random. Is Sotty7 scummy for voting ckool5000 randomly? Is Perpetuum
scummy for voting treeshavenotongues randomly? Answer = no.

ckool5000 · Post Post #82 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 11:48 am

Oh, right. Sorry, I messed up the words. Switch you and Sotty around. "Meh" means "maybe scum, maybe town."

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #83 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 2:01 pm

Rustythepirate wrote:
Unvote

Vote: Lamont_Cranston

Lamont_Cranston wrote:He had posted NO content
AND USED RANDOM.ORG TO "PICK HIS VOTE FOR HIM"
I think both points together are important.

[quote "Rustythepirate"]It's the random voting stage.

Yes and it is so important for gathering information for day2 after we have a lynch and kill on record. So far my read on you is village so I understand your motivation for voting for me.

However I just want to point out that I think the village will benefit from a vote on either ckool or johoolno at this time.

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #84 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 2:08 pm

Based on the change of current events I am changing my vote to Johoolno to further investigate this voting dynamic.

Unvote. Vote Johoolno.

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #85 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 2:20 pm

I'm sorry my posts aren't very precise, I am at work right now and making them in between calls.

sekinj · Post Post #86 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:27 pm

Day 1: Vote Count 5 (by special request)

(corrections made)

(# of votes against) Voted Player - by Voter(s)

(0) ckool5000 - by none
(2) Johoohno - by SensFan, Lamont_Cranston
(0) lailai - by none

(2) Lamont_Cranston - by Sotty7, Rustythepirate

(1) Perpetuum - by treeshavenotongues
(1) Rustythepirate - by Johoohno (0) SensFan - by none
(0) Sotty7 - by none
(1) treeshavenotongues - by Perpetuum

Not Voting: lailai, ckool5000

With nine (9) citizens alive it takes

five (5) votes to lynch.

Day 1 Deadline: 5/09/09 12:00 PM CST

Mod Annoucements:
- lailai is V/LA from 4/18/09 through 4/19/09 (has until tomorrow before I start looking for replacement)
- Day 1 deadline has been correct from 4/27/09 to 5/09/09 (3 weeks per day)

Rustythepirate · Post Post #87 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 4:02 pm

Didn't like the decision to delete the post, but that's your choice and you're the mod so I'll respect it.

I didn't like the decision to ignore rule A-3. Please PM me with any administrative corrections/requests. Do not post such items in thread.

Lamont_Cranston wrote:Based on the change of current events I am changing my vote to Johoolno to further investigate this voting dynamic.

What change in current events? You went from encouraging other players to vote ckool5000 to changing your vote to Johoolno. Johoolno had not posted to make you change your opinion. Why did you do this?

I disagree with Johoohno's assessment of SensFan, and his decision to judge someone's playstyle from

page one

is certainly strange.

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #88 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:07 pm

Well Rusty I've noticed that when ckool was at L-1 all of a sudden Johoolno comes out of the blue with all sorts of pressure. There has been a major shift from ckool as of late...

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #89 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 6:08 pm

EBWOP Sorry L-2 NOT L-1 which is another strange thing because he got all jumpy about the "risk" when cool was only at L-2 which is perfectly acceptable...

SensFan · Post Post #90 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 6:24 pm

MOD: What are the EXACT contents of the post (of Rusty's) that he mentions got deleted?

The post contained nothing but a request to correct errors in the vote count. These errors have been corrected. Since the post was administrative in nature only, contained no other information, and violated rule A-3, it was deleted. If you have further concerns about this, please PM me.

Johoohno · Post Post #91 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 6:44 pm

SensFan wrote: I refresh my list of games probably at least 10 times an hour, for the most part. If there's a new post, I'll read it. If its a question to me, I'll answer - especially an IC-question. Otherwise, a couple of times a day I'll sit down and really hammer out some posts. Yesterday, I was involved in a heated debate in another game, and that took most of my time.

Fair enough. On another topic, what do you think of Lamont_Cranston following you on pretty much everything?

Johoohno · Post Post #92 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 6:57 pm

@ treeshavenotongue & Perpetuum:

Are your votes on each other just left there since the random stage or do you see any reasons for them? (this could also be considered a "I'd appreciate it if I saw more of you in the game-post")

sekinj · Post Post #93 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2009 3:50 pm

Pick it up people. Cattle prods are next.

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #94 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2009 6:10 pm

Ok I am posting this because I would like to at least keep up with my Daily Recommended Allowance of one post and I will state this for the record:

The silence is deafening. The village may be ripping itself apart here. I would normally recommend lynching the lurkers in this situation but since this site is so proactive with their replacements I am not sure what to suggest...

Sotty7 · Post Post #95 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2009 2:43 am

Lamont_Cranston Post 77 wrote:Welcome back Sotty. I find it odd you ask me a bunch of questions and then just vote for me without even waiting for the answers. I assume that it is a temporary vote just to get my attention huh?

No. it's a vote for the player I find the most suspicious.

You know what they say about assuming.

Lamont_Cranston wrote:
Sotty7 wrote:
Lamont_Cranston Post 26 wrote:
Unvote, vote ckool

The dynamics have changed
Like?
Like my vote is more useful somewhere else.

Lamont_Cranston Post 28 wrote:In this case, a vote is worth a thousand words.
What do you mean by this post?
He had posted NO content & made a huge deal out of using random.org to choose his post FOR him thus alleviating any responsibility for his vote (supposedly).

To the second question, why did you just not post your reasoning when you voted? Simply saying your vote was “pro village” isn't very helpful at all.

Lamont_Cranston Post 78 wrote:Sotty I think we can work together as village here. My opinion is that your vote is better placed where you had it; i.e. on ckool.

Since I have answered your questions, please put your vote back there.

No... I'm happy where it is right now.

ckool5000 Post 80 wrote:Lamont: He seems very scummy to me. I mean, just look at the post right above this one!

What makes his post scummy to

you

? Also you unvoted and yet found Lamont “very scummy” why not vote him?

Lamont_Cranston Post 84 wrote:Based on the change of current events I am changing my vote to Johoolno to further investigate this voting dynamic.

Unvote. Vote Johoolno.

What has changed? You seemed dead set on ckool just now.

Lamont_Cranston Post 94 wrote:Ok I am posting this because I would like to at least keep up with my Daily Recommended Allowance of one post and I will state this for the record:

The silence is deafening. The village may be ripping itself apart here. I would normally recommend lynching the lurkers in this situation but since this site is so proactive with their replacements I am not sure what to suggest...

Sorry for not getting on yesterday, I was away from my comp for a day which meant I was unable to post.

sekinj · Post Post #96 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2009 2:48 am

Notice: cpe replaces lailai effective immediately.

cpe · Post Post #97 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2009 3:08 am

vote: Johoohno

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #98 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2009 3:16 am

CPE would you please care to explain that vote??

cpe · Post Post #99 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2009 3:39 am

From reading around a lot on the forum, I've observed that following SensFan is often a good idea. Also, there isn't much to go on at this point, and moving the game on would be good, that suggests voting for person with most votes just to get a lynching, any lynching, so that the game progresses, maybe not the best tactics, but if we have to lynch someone to progress th game, and with little solid to go on, well, lets lynch the person it looks like it may be quickest to lynch.

If the above gets me lynched, well that will progress the game too.