Newbie 1053: Wait, what? Game over?!

Sotty7 · Post Post #75 (ISO) » Fri Jan 28, 2011 8:35 am

Nobody Special wrote:
@Mod:
Can we get prods for jediknight and wredfar?

I prodded them this morning. Notification is in the vote count.

And since it is the top of the page...

5th Vote count of day one

ConSpiracy: 2 (Trendall, Nobody Special)

Maxous: 1 (LordChronos)
Nobody Special: 1 (ConSpiracy)
jediknight: 1 (Maxous)

Not voting: 4 (wredfar, bacon, jediknight, Akira)

Deadline for the end of day one is Thursday 10th of February at 7:30am CST
With
9
alive it takes
5
to lynch.

Nobody Special · Post Post #76 (ISO) » Fri Jan 28, 2011 8:37 am

Oh sure, hide them where no one can find them.

ConSpiracy · Post Post #77 (ISO) » Fri Jan 28, 2011 8:47 am

NS wrote:Okay. I see your entire response to me, but it hardly makes sense, taken all together. In the first bolded part, you call me scum. In the second bolded part, you don't want to "discredit" me at all.

Does not compute.

@Max: This is why i'm voting ConSpiracy. I feel that he's scum, trying to paint other players as ascum (and not very well, at that).

The discrediting was about saying you might be a bad IC. Please don't interpretate my words differently.

I also wonder that would be a certified reason to vote for me. I am at least trying to find some scum to the contrary of others.
At least the vote gives us something to discuss, since activity is too far down.

Nobody Special · Post Post #78 (ISO) » Fri Jan 28, 2011 8:50 am

Oh. Well, thanks for clearing that up. I still think it was a rather disengenuous thing to say in the first place, and I still think you're scum.

Maxous · Post Post #79 (ISO) » Fri Jan 28, 2011 9:28 am

First NS votes without giving a reason. When asked the reason it is because he feels that CS as mafia is trying to paint others as mafia- highlighting his 'NS is scum' and 'did'nt want to discredit you at all' comments.
NS then seems to accept CS' explanation but still think's CS is scum. So the reason left seems to be, it is because CS is mafia trying to paint others as mafia - instead of an attempt to find mafia.
Yet this was'nt mentioned on his post when he voted. He did'nt feel the need to explain why he was putting a second vote on someone?
I am sceptical of NS' reasoning of voting for CS and I feel his vote could of been opportunistic after Trendall's.
So

fos: on NS

I am not voting yet as there are a couple of players I have not got a proper read on yet.

Akira · Post Post #80 (ISO) » Fri Jan 28, 2011 10:09 am

Maxous wrote:I am not voting yet as there are a couple of players I have not got a proper read on yet.

Same here. So:
@bacon and wredfar: Some personal opinions, gutfeelings, anything?

wredfar · Post Post #81 (ISO) » Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:58 pm

I'm here. I stand by what i aaid earlier and still think Ns is scum. He contradicts himself a little and i really dont see his logic.

bacon · Post Post #82 (ISO) » Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:24 pm

Akira wrote:@bacon and wredfar: Some personal opinions, gutfeelings, anything?

I don't have much to say that I haven't already said. My suspicion of Akira and Max has dropped since my last post here. I'm still suspicious of ConSpiracy and he hasn't properly explained himself in my opinion. He seems to be trying to make everyone (more) suspicious of each other than they normally would be, which is bad for the town. For that reason I'm throwing my vote in on him.

VOTE: ConSpiracy

jediknight · Post Post #83 (ISO) » Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:35 pm

Hey guys...i hadn't realized that it had been so long since I posted. I'm here and I'm still reading.

Unfortunately I have got to agree with what everyone else is saying. Con appears to be stirring things up more than anything. So

vote: ConSpiracy

wredfar · Post Post #84 (ISO) » Fri Jan 28, 2011 5:43 pm

Con has 4 votes. One more and he's lynched

Akira · Post Post #85 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 2:00 am

jediknight wrote:Unfortunately I have got to agree with what everyone else is saying. Con appears to be stirring things up more than anything. So
vote: ConSpiracy

I'm not liking that "Unfortunately", you should be happy that we've finally found a decent case.
I've got my eye on you.

LordChronos · Post Post #86 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 3:13 am

Unvote; Vote: jediknight

Why did you put Con at L-1?

Sotty7 · Post Post #87 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 4:04 am

6th Vote count of day one

ConSpiracy: 4 (Trendall, Nobody Special, bacon, jediknight)

jediknight: 2 (Maxous, LordChronos)
Nobody Special: 1 (ConSpiracy)

Not voting: 2 (wredfar, Akira)

Deadline for the end of day one is Thursday 10th of February at 7:30am CST
With
9
alive it takes
5
to lynch.

Maxous · Post Post #88 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 4:27 am

bacon wrote: My suspicion of Akira and Max has dropped since my last post here.

Why? What did we say to make you less suspicious of us?

Trendall · Post Post #89 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 6:14 am

LordChronos, what is your opinion on ConSpiracy?

Nobody Special · Post Post #90 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 6:43 am

wredfar wrote:Con has 4 votes. One more and he's lynched

Except I see you aren't voting for anyone.

Who's your top suspect right now?

LordChronos · Post Post #91 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 11:11 am

Trendall wrote:LordChronos, what is your opinion on ConSpiracy?

I think some of his questions were scummy, but I don't feel like lynching him right now. Certainly he is doing a lot more to help the town than some of the other players in this game.

jediknight · Post Post #92 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 11:37 am

Akira wrote:
jediknight wrote:Unfortunately I have got to agree with what everyone else is saying. Con appears to be stirring things up more than anything. So
vote: ConSpiracy
I'm not liking that "Unfortunately", you should be happy that we've finally found a decent case.
I've got my eye on you.

Lol..I think I can handle your eye on me. Yeah, I said unfortunately...its that random day one slight twinge of remorse of voting without any real knowledge. I thought everyone got it. Maybe it's just me...

Doesn't change my vote but that's my reasoning for the unfortunately.

jediknight · Post Post #93 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 11:53 am

LordChronos wrote:
Unvote; Vote: jediknight

Why did you put Con at L-1?

I had typed up a post and then my internet burped. I lost it. Here's the gist.

His line of questioning and comment about a "policy lynch" if he didn't get the answers to his satisfaction. But then he's not really answering any questions of him to the rest of our satisfaction. So I turned on the heat...

Maxous · Post Post #94 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 12:07 pm

Hmm

@Jediknight: Apart from CS who do you think is mafia or the most suspicious? Anyone at all?

bacon · Post Post #95 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 4:16 pm

Maxous wrote:
bacon wrote: My suspicion of Akira and Max has dropped since my last post here.
Why? What did we say to make you less suspicious of us?

Not anything in particular. I just got a good gut feeling between those posts. Don't worry, I'm still keeping my eye on you.

ConSpiracy · Post Post #96 (ISO) » Sun Jan 30, 2011 12:15 am

Well, at least the discussion got up a bit.

bacon wrote:I don't have much to say that I haven't already said. My suspicion of Akira and Max has dropped since my last post here. I'm still suspicious of ConSpiracy and he hasn't properly explained himself in my opinion. He seems to be trying to make everyone (more) suspicious of each other than they normally would be, which is bad for the town. For that reason I'm throwing my vote in on him.

VOTE: ConSpiracy

How did I make every body more suspicious of every body than they were? And why is that bad if it were good reasons for it? What didn't I make clear enough when I explained my actions?
I'd rather have every body vote with explained accusations.

jediknight wrote:Hey guys...i hadn't realized that it had been so long since I posted. I'm here and I'm still reading.

Unfortunately I have got to agree with what everyone else is saying. Con appears to be stirring things up more than anything. So
vote: ConSpiracy

Eehm, stirring up discussion is bad? I am more happy with town right now since they do something. The first 5 days nothing happened.

wredfar wrote:Con has 4 votes. One more and he's lynched

Great that we know that... What do you think about it? What do you think about the NS case? What do you even think of the case on me instead of only saying objective things like that?

Trendall wrote:LordChronos, what is your opinion on ConSpiracy?

Trendall, what is your opinion of the other things that are said to be scummy?
(i.e. about NS and jedi)

LordChronos wrote:I think some of his questions were scummy, but I don't feel like lynching him right now. Certainly he is doing a lot more to help the town than some of the other players in this game.

This.

jediknight wrote:I had typed up a post and then my internet burped. I lost it. Here's the gist.

His line of questioning and comment about a "policy lynch" if he didn't get the answers to his satisfaction. But then he's not really answering any questions of him to the rest of our satisfaction. So I turned on the heat...

Where didn't I answer a question to your satisfaction? And didn't you vote me for an other reason than that explained earlier? Please vote with concrete evidence instead of just random accusations. That is not very townish.

ConSpiracy · Post Post #97 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 12:55 am

I have a very busy period coming up and won't be able to post long arguments and such before next weekend.
You know my stance and if it drastically changes I will point that out and say why, but don't expect anything big.
I will still skim the thread and can possibly answer some questions as long as those questions don't require me to reread (parts) of the thread.

And activity needs to go way up.

Nobody Special · Post Post #98 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 7:42 am

Well, I'm waiting for wredfar to come back and answer my question.

I think it's slightly suspicious that he dropped in to simply point out that ConSpiracy was at L-1. This grows even more suspicious with his apparent active lurking that is beginning to be a pattern.

bacon · Post Post #99 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:27 pm

@CS-It was the way you presented it mostly, you didn't show your own thought process on anyone else and just asked questions that specifically targeted others. For example Akira in the question you asked me. I wasn't too suspicious before but you highlighted it. It seems to me like you wanted to target Akira without saying you were suspicious.

@everyone- I agree that Wredfar seems suspicious as well, and should possibly be another one of our suspects.