Mini 66 - Harry Potter Mafia, Game Over

[Gaspode]

BTW, why

are

you people voting for modargo? I think it's highly suspicious that he was suddenly in danger of being lynched without any reasoning whatsoever.

[Someone]

oops . Didn't realise that we started on a night. 5 to lynch then

[Dragon Slayer]

FOS Phoebus

for starting a stupid POINTLESS bandwagon.

Vote Kerplunk

for going along with said POINTLESS bandwagon.

-DS

[Kerplunk]

Sorry, guys for putting that fourth vote on modargo. I just wanted some discussion going on and I didn't realise we already lost 3 people and it was 5 to lynch. It was awfully quiet in here and I thought that maybe a good old-fashioned bandwagon would do the trick. I was just stupid enough not to read the number of players left alive.

unvote: modargo

, there's a bit discussion, no point in voting for modargo anymore.

[Phoebus]

FOS Phoebus

for starting a stupid POINTLESS bandwagon.

-DS

My first FOS!! Thanks DS!

stupid pointless bandwagon??! My points have been outlined in my voting post. This thread was going nowhere and still isn't going anywhere. Just random finger pointing. Though Kerplunk does raise the scumdar a bit...

I'm willing to change my vote if there are any leads.

[Thoth]

Both Phoebus and especially Kerplunk get a small mark in my scum index. I don't think its enough for a vote just yet as I can understand the bandwagon vote when nothing is happening on day 1.


For now I prefer to go after a lurker.

vote:vIQleS

because the following is his complete contribution to the game so far.

Random

vote: Modargo

[Dragon Slayer]

C'mon folks!
Let's get some more discussion going!

Unvote:vIQleS

Vote:modargo

Don't want to seem as if I'm picking on anyone but this thread is going nowhere fast!

-P.

Sorry, that didn't look like a random vote to me. I didn't see a reason there either.

Unvote kerplunk; vote VIQleS

because I think voting for a lurker is better than voting for a participating newbie.

-DS

[Untrod Tripod]

Although it could be that other people analyzed the game before he did, and he didn't want to seem redundant, I dislike lurkers

vote viqles

[modargo]

Since I suggested vIQles in the first place, I want to vote for him, but since there are already three on him, I'm going to hold off for a bit. It doesn't seem like a good idea to put on the fourth vote without even giving him a chance to post in his defense.

[Untrod Tripod]

Uh, DS?

FOS Phoebus for starting a stupid POINTLESS bandwagon.

Vote Kerplunk for going along with said POINTLESS bandwagon.

One, that's a pretty aggressive of you. Two, Viqles started the modargo bandwagon, followed by electra, followed by Phoebus, Electra unvotes, followed by Kerplunk.
I don't see how him just going with a beginning game bandwagon is scummy; pehaps you could explain? Even though we've moved on, I'd like to hear the logic behind that.

[Dragon Slayer]

Where did someone else start the bandwagon. I didn't even see!

Sorry.

[Untrod Tripod]

It's on page 2

[Thoth]

I think the unwritten understanding is that the 3rd vote makes it a bandwagon. The first 2 are just votes. At least thats the way it feels to me.

[vIQleS]

I've been busy, that's all. I am in the middle of rehearsals, and finding a new flat and I'm not supposed to use the phoneline while other people are home...

Unvote: mod

Plus there hasn't really been anything said so far that I felt the urgent need to comment on... The implication that there was a spell gone wrong is an interesting point that could point towards certain characters, (other than lockhart) Ron's broken wand or Neville Longbottom for starters... (neither would be bad tho imho...) That's two that I can remember that had problems wth spells...

New as i was typing:

Two, Viqles started the modargo bandwagon, followed by electra, followed by Phoebus

I didn't start a bandwagon. One person can not be a bandwagon, two is also not a bandwagon, the third person could be considered to be attempting to create a bandwagon (if the vote is premeditated based on an accurate count), but afaic a bandwagon is really the point at which someone says 'Hey, lets kill Untrod'.

[Untrod Tripod]

Hmm, I've considered the first vote as being the start, with other people voting as just following it.

[Dragon Slayer]

That's right, Viqles made a random vote so he can't be fingered for any bandwagon. He was, however, not participating. Umm... I'm not sure what to do but I know that we're not getting to far with any of this. I guess I'll

Unvote Viqles

for now. Nothing else to really go on that I can see. Can anyone else shed some light on this?

-DS

[Thoth]

unvote:vIQleS

This was funny:

New as i was typing:

Wed Nov 12, 2003 1:03 am
Wed Nov 12, 2003 12:18 am

You must be the slowest typist or have the worst connection I've ever seen.

No idea at the moment what to do now.

[Dragon Slayer]

I'm also drawing a blank.

-DS

[Untrod Tripod]

Bad excuse, viqles, I noticed that too, but I didn't think it'd need to be pointed out. Have an explination for us?

[vIQleS]

Thoth: Worst connection ever...

Untrod: Explaination for what? I covered everything in my post I thought...

[Thoth]

It does not seem like we're getting anywhere further at the moment. For the moment I will go with the only one that did something really suspicious so far and only put up a weak defense for that.

vote: Kerplunk

[Kerplunk]

You agree with me that discussion was being low (very low) and most of the time a bandwagon is what could turn the discussion up. Nothing wrong with that, I think. I'm only suspicious because I put a fourth vote on. I only can say that I didn't counted the number of players and thought (like it is always) 6 to lynch. This is mostly what I said earlier.

I also, don't have a clue who to vote for.

Maybe a

FOS to Dragon Slayer

for making such a strong statement about the bandwagon which in my eyes was not very POINTLESS at all.

[Dragon Slayer]

How was the bandwagon you followed sensible. You didn't state a reason and followed Phoebus who also didn't have a reason stated. That's why it seemed pointless to me. If one of you two turn out to be mafia I would be very suspicious of the other.

-DS

[Phoebus]

Phoebus who also didn't have a reason stated

Please stop saying that!
Agreed you find my reason unappealing but it

has

been stated in my post. Starting discussion...
Even modargo himself acknowledged it to be legitimate.

As for the "badnwagon" I hadn't a clue that the third vote is considered as the start of one. I guess I shall be careful from here on in as to when I vote.

Still,

FOS:Kerplunk

for the fourth vote...maybe he really did not count the number of alve players...maybe he did...

[Dragon Slayer]

For the last time-

C'mon folks!
Let's get some more discussion going!

Unvote:vIQleS

Vote:modargo

Don't want to seem as if I'm picking on anyone but this thread is going nowhere fast!

-P.

I see you doing 3 things.

1) Telling us to start talking more.

2)Unvoting vIQleS.

3) Voting modargo.

No where do you say Vote Modargo because

he

isn't talking or for something else. I still don't see what reason you stated is there. Maybe you explained the vote later, but I"m talking about the post that had your vote in it. and cool it, I'm not even FOSing you for it. I think you over reacted a bit so a small

FOS to you, Phoebus

.

-DS