Mafia 55: Yakuza - Game over!

Blackberry · Post Post #750 (ISO) » Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:16 pm

(2) is out of the question in my opinion. Why bus a buddy when one mislynch gives you the win? It'd make more sense to go after someone that wasn't your partner.

Which makes me ask: Who is Stalling's partner??

Mike, who do you think? Since you supposedly suspect you'll be killed tonight.

mikeburnfire · Post Post #751 (ISO) » Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:30 pm

Stalling and ShadowLurker. I believe they are scum. TSQ was excessively scummy when he was here, and I'd always suspected SL, but doubted that we had something so underhanded as scum masons to contend with.

Stalling saying that ShadowLurker has a gun is just distancing. He's not sacrificing a buddy, he's sacrificing himself. If we lynch Stalling, then the "Guilty" result on ShadowLurker makes him look more innocent. If he succeeds in convincing us that ShadowLurker isn't scum, then he HAS won the game.

Now, I've been very concerned about DG. When she went after TSQ/Stalling full-force, I thought that she and SL were scum pretending to be masons. However, that cannot be the case anymore, because that would mean that Stalling is telling the truth, and he claims to have a "no gun" result on DG. Therefore, there can not be a DG-SL scum group.

I've also considered a DG-Stalling scumgroup. Afterall, DG has painted SL as a scummason, and Stalling claims to have a gun on him. I had bad feelings that they are strong-arming his lynch. But then I wonder why he wouldn't bother to defend himself. Why does he not explain why he told DG to leave Stalling alone? If it was all a lie, why doesn't he call her on it? No, this possibility doesn't work either.

I keep considering all the posibilities, there's a mountain of evidence against TSQ that Stalling inherited. DG's story about SL's odd behavior in protecting TSQ is damning, and I have no choice but to believe it.

Confirm vote: StallingChamp

4 days people. Let's hurry to night so I can die or wake up and lynch the final scum.

StallingChamp · Post Post #752 (ISO) » Wed Feb 28, 2007 12:10 am

Just for my sake, can people tell me if they are lynching

me

or

my predecesor

?

I know it doesnt change much, but I would like to know. I can't defend what I didn't do.

StallingChamp · Post Post #753 (ISO) » Wed Feb 28, 2007 12:12 am

Add-on: And honestly, if the town is so adamant about lynching me today, just go ahead for Mike's sake. If you all want me lynched, then I think we owe it to Mike to speed the game up.

NOTE: I AM NOT GIVING UP. I AM JUST SAYING WE SHOULD TRY TO FIT HIS SCHEDULE IF POSSIBLE.

mikeburnfire · Post Post #754 (ISO) » Wed Feb 28, 2007 1:36 am

Yes, it's true, Stalling. We're really lynching TSQ here. Here are my reasons:

http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... &start=551
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... &start=601
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... &start=679

Blackberry · Post Post #755 (ISO) » Wed Feb 28, 2007 5:34 am

SL + DGB could be masons if DGB was godfather and the purpose of them claiming masons was hoping that DGB would get investigated first ...

mikeburnfire · Post Post #756 (ISO) » Wed Feb 28, 2007 5:37 am

If DG was a godfather, then she would have been "innocent" to our cop, but still "has a gun" to our gunsmith.

Blackberry · Post Post #757 (ISO) » Wed Feb 28, 2007 5:44 am

Why do you say that? Why would a Godfather have a gun? O_o

Blackberry · Post Post #758 (ISO) » Wed Feb 28, 2007 5:52 am

SL nor Klebian are talking very much. I want to hear more from them.

All SL did was say "What The Hell" .... o_O VERY CONTRIBUTIONAL... -_-

mikeburnfire · Post Post #759 (ISO) » Wed Feb 28, 2007 5:54 am

The godfather may appear innocent to cops, but if she doesn't have a gun then she can't make the kill.

Can we please just lynch StallingChamp before I leave?

Blackberry · Post Post #760 (ISO) » Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:16 am

Well you aren't waiting on me. I'm active and post daily. You can't get a lynch with klebian or SL and they aint contributing... tsk tsk tsk. *slaps them*

mikeburnfire · Post Post #761 (ISO) » Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:22 am

I suppose that's true.

Curse you and your accurate logic.

klebian · Post Post #762 (ISO) » Wed Feb 28, 2007 12:15 pm

I need to reread... -_-. I'll try to be quick about this

StallingChamp · Post Post #763 (ISO) » Wed Feb 28, 2007 1:45 pm

MBF remind me, when are you leaving?

Blackberry · Post Post #764 (ISO) » Wed Feb 28, 2007 2:51 pm

Stalling, if you wanna aid MBF and admit you are scum that would be kool.

StallingChamp · Post Post #765 (ISO) » Wed Feb 28, 2007 2:53 pm

Honestly, if no one is lynched the day before he leaves, I will probably lynch myself for his sake. I would much rather let him see the game to its end than need a replacement at this point and have him not know what happened.

mikeburnfire · Post Post #766 (ISO) » Wed Feb 28, 2007 3:24 pm

Oh, I'll know what happens... just thirteen weeks later.

Leaving Sunday, so I doubt I'll see tomorrow's lynch.

StallingChamp · Post Post #767 (ISO) » Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:21 pm

Better question - If I cannot defend myself AT ALL from the allegations against me, does it make more sense to just lynch me now (it will happen anyways, I'm 99% sure) so that we can talk post-game before Mike leaves?

Maybe this is a mistake on my part, but I feel that letting one of the more prominent players get closure on the game is more important than trying to drag it on with a very slight chance of winning.

Blackberry · Post Post #768 (ISO) » Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:40 pm

Stalling if you're scum do us all a favor and admit it.

mikeburnfire · Post Post #769 (ISO) » Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:16 pm

Admitting to being scum would be poor playing on his part.

ShadowLurker · Post Post #770 (ISO) » Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:07 pm

TSQ in post 453

I would actually prefer not to claim today, as I can check some of the claims.

StallingChamp's claimed results

N1: Blackberry (formerly BabyJesus), no gun
N2: Borge, gun
N3: Coron, no gun
N3: ShadowLurker, gun

The only people TSQ could've "confirmed" at the time was Blackberry seeing as Coron and Bogre were already dead. The only person that was not dead that he got a result on was Blackberry. Blackberry he got no gun on so Blackberry should have been obviously town. Who was he trying to confirm then? There was no sense in saying he had an investigative role and not revealing his results as he would've probably gotten NKed anyway if he was town when he could've at least tried to confirm one person.

Vote:StallingChamp

Let's lynch DGB tommorow.

StallingChamp · Post Post #771 (ISO) » Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:30 am

Stupid scum lynching me...

mikeburnfire · Post Post #772 (ISO) » Thu Mar 01, 2007 3:44 am

How about we lynch you tomorrow instead, ShadowLurker? Holy cow, you couldn't be more suspicious. Your attacks on me have totally disappeared, you haven't disputed the things that DG has said about you, you've barely participated at all since Jules got axed, and now you're trying to get your mason partner lynched.

It's fine if I don't make it to the endgame anymore, since I have no doubts to who the scum are.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #773 (ISO) » Thu Mar 01, 2007 6:47 am

Now Blackberry, here's a real opportunity to hammer for you. You've been itching to hammer since you've joined the game. Here's your chance!

*drumroll*

Is Blackberry going to take this opportunity to hammer the scum, or is he going to prolong the agony with another post without a vote?

The astonishing answer in the following posts, same channel, same time!

Blackberry · Post Post #774 (ISO) » Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:12 am

Vote: Stalling

For Mike, for Mike...

AND THAT'S GAME!! SCUM (ME AND MIKE) WIN!! ^_^