Mini Normal 2137 | Polandball | Over

[votato]

Hello, the last couple of days have been busy for me, it'll be brief but I'll finish my catchup tonight.

Im a VT.

IMO Pickaxe Pete should be claiming much earlier than he is in that order

i agree with that. i kinda think pickaxe should be claiming next, but i guess if eyestott claims ill claim regardless of whether pickaxe shows up.

[notscience]

You remember when I asked for input on the order? That is the type of input I’m talking about. I’m fine with Pete claiming sooner but you guys should have said something earlier

[Pickaxe Pete]

I'm fine claiming now. I'm vt.

[eyestott]

I’m a one shot investigative who hasn’t yet used his shot.

[notscience]

This isn’t the time for obscurities.

And why not

[votato]

im an x-shot roleblocker. no comment on blocks remaining. if needed i can reveal x.

[notscience]

In case it wasn’t obvious I want you full claim and any crumbs

Pedit

Why is fucking everyone being vague this is massclaun we need to know it all

[votato]

1-shot. no crumbs. if you look through my other games you wont see crumbs there either though.

[notscience]

Okay.

Eyestott I need to know what you are. I need to know if you crumbed it anywhere and I need to know why, exactly, you wouldn’t use an investigative shot in a cluster like this to help sort it out.

Votato I need your target and rationale

[notscience]

Target rationale and when you used it

[votato]

unused. There wasnt much to go on, but i thought i'd probably be alive long enough to use it later with more info.

[Dolly Parton]

I guess its my turn now, I'm 1-Shot BP Townie.

[notscience]

Do you have any crumbs prior to you crumbing after mass lain was talked about

[Dolly Parton]

Do you have any crumbs prior to you crumbing after mass lain was talked about

No, I was trying to draw a NK shot.

[notscience]

Waiting on fwes and eyestott

[Fwesnid]

Didn't crumb though you could consider 502 a soft.

Watcher
Night 1 I watched atarashi, no visits.
Night 2 I watched notsci, no result.
(Picked townreads that were also shared, obviously)

I supported mass claim because it was likely I die tonight with how this game's going, and I had assumed pete was tracker who would get roleblocked.

And if we mishang and I did catch a scum I question if I would be believed coming out with a cc in lylo with no other info.

[Fwesnid]

Also I'm not a fan of eye's vagueness, if they're voyeur they should not be hiding it as town, and if they're anything else they are useful for possible coordination.

[votato]

notsci i think you claim here before eyestott. unless you're an investigative i suppose

[Fwesnid]

I don't see why eye can't just claim?

[notscience]

Dgbs claim kinda just makes me want to look at her. I think that’s my final answer bc I’m wondering if the setup is hella voyeurs and that likely means one is scum.

Dgb is my final answer

I’ve been thinking overnight and I don’t see a way dgbs claim comes from scum. She wasn’t under pressure or anything. So I’m pretty confident that she’s both town and that scum has a watcher as well.

I’m not going to elaborate further until eyestott fullclaims.

[notscience]

I will say of all of the claims I don’t like dollys (this is the part where she acts like a diva again) and eyestotts for separate reasons.

One, dollys crumb. The idea behind a breadcrumb is you hide it in your iso to refer to later. It’s not supposed to be super overt. So her excuse of trying to draw a night kill, while understandable, should have literally nothing to do with the crumb. If she’s hiding it in a way that scum can pick up on it she’s crumbing wrong. Then comes her actual crumb- her blatantly bolding bp in a post. Such an over the top way to do it. Now, if I’m remembering correctly she was saying she’s been here (on ms) longer than I have. Clearly not on this account. Do you really think someone who’s been here that long wouldn’t be able to hide a crumb early? Or is it more likely she’s scum and chose that as a solid fake claim.

Eyestott is fairly obvious as he’s been trickle truthing when he hasn’t done anything all game. First off says there’s a ninja of some kind. Then he doesn’t claim correctly and he too is someone who should know better. And not using his shot earlier unless he has damn good justification is sketchy because of how this game has gone.

[notscience]

There’s likely at least one scum in the VTs. Most likely paragon, outside chance of klick.

Eyestotts post could also be stalling for time to come up with a good fakeclaim

I don’t think if votato were scum he would claim roleblocker given how this game has gone and the flips we’ve had. So I’m believing his.

[votato]

im gonna suggest that we wait for the last two claims before discussing too much here.

[notscience]

Fine by me I just wanted to articulate what I was thinking before it got too cyclical and echo chambery

[eyestott]

I’m a 1-shot watcher. I didn’t use it because I had no idea who the mafia would target with their night kill.
And hey, I’m 1-shot bulletproof too.
I didn’t really “crumb” this game, even though I’ve done so in the other games I’ve been in that are now finished
Other than me saying that the mod didn’t respond to my pms at the start of the game. I was asking him if
A) I can use my watcher ability to target myself
B) I’ll be informed if I lose my bulletproof ability
Dolly and Fwesnid should be able to confirm the answers to each of these are no.