I didn't say which of us is/did softclaim.
For a reason.
In post 838, Kaboose wrote:In post 828, Boonskiies wrote:Honestly, if the other mason doesn't claim now, it just gives scum an easy fake claim 1v1 situation later, and we have a chance at lynching a confirmed townie rather than it getting NK'd.
Okay I really want to lynch this.
First, how are you able to know there's only one more mason? Your wording suggests you do.
Second, why wouldn't you want scum to fakeclaim that at some point? Wouldn't that catch us a scum even if we have to decipher between who is and who isn't? ONE of them would at least be scum. That to me is a positive.
Also since you just mentioned it could be a fakeclaim, how are you sure it would confirm a townie?
This is terrible.
In post 853, Kaboose wrote:Boonskies you're terrible. Really, really terrible. Stop being such plz.
In post 858, Boonskiies wrote:In post 853, Kaboose wrote:Boonskies you're terrible. Really, really terrible. Stop being such plz.
what a fucking GREAT DEFENSE. I'll nominate you for a scummy.
In post 861, ika wrote:boons, how about you just shut up, like your spam is not helpful
pedit: you too kaboose smatic debates are stupid and do no good
In post 863, Boonskiies wrote:In post 861, ika wrote:boons, how about you just shut up, like your spam is not helpful
pedit: you too kaboose smatic debates are stupid and do no good
Don't fucking tell me what to do. I'll fucking do whatever.