bold means confirmed.
Alive:
Dead:
Game starts when everyone confirms. Roles out.
darkdude wrote:Vote: Lotus
There is meta suggesting that players who vote for me for that reason are scum.
http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 38#1182538
Lotus wrote: Confirm Vote Darkdude for
1) His first post is justified with a logical fallacy (Post hoc ergo propter hoc)
2) OMGUS votes have a much more extensive meta for scum.
I wish I could resist ending the RV stage so early, but here goes.Lotus wrote: Confirm Vote Darkdude for
1) His first post is justified with a logical fallacy (Post hoc ergo propter hoc)
2) OMGUS votes have a much more extensive meta for scum.
Frustrating. I'm getting some strong vibes from this post, but vibes are the one thing I've learnt not to trust unless they can be later justified. "DO, no hard feelings I hope. I was town too" was obviously for our benifet; DO should know what happened in his own game. This post gives me a bizzare feeling of "Hey, everyone! I'm cool, relaxed and enjoying mafia!" This might sound irrelevant, but it's an interesting thought to try and put yourself in Rhinox's shoes as town or scum.Rhinox wrote:vote: DO
*snip*
jkunvote
I know DO and lotus, happy to see you guys again. DO, no hard feelings I hope. I was town too
vote: KidIcariusfor thinking random votes need reasons.
OK. I didn't check the game in question, but the post makes a lot more sense now that I have.Deuxieme Octopus wrote:I see your logic Xdaamno concerning Rhinox's "I was town too" thing, but in this particular case, Rhinox was led a bandwagon against me, prompting me to lose my cool, insult nearly everyone, and subsequently replace out. Because of my replacement, I (or Rhinox) never had the chance to apologize for letting things get out of hand. Take what you will from his post, but because of our specific circumstances, I think it's quite acceptable.
...Lotus wrote:darkdude wrote:Vote: Lotus
There is meta suggesting that players who vote for me for that reason are scum.
http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 38#1182538Confirm Vote Darkdudefor
1) His first post is justified with a logical fallacy (Post hoc ergo propter hoc)
2) OMGUS votes have a much more extensive meta for scum.
Agreed.Xdaamno wrote:Secondly, unless you're joking, stop trying to justify random votes. If you were serious, explain how committing a logical fallacy while joking makes a person more likely to be scum.
Which makes him annoying.Deux wrote:Vote:Guzame because he doesn't realize Pit is (aside from Meta Knight) the spammiest spam-king in all of SSBB.