Raging Wishbone:
Zmd:
J-Scope:
not voting:
~~~
~~~
not voting:
Day 4 deadline: 14 days from this post
Nothing in that was twisted. It doesn't make sense for a doc to suspect their target for still being alive.Raging Wishbone wrote:I think once you reread my exchange with ZMD, you will see how he framed the discussion to serve his purpose.
Neither. We thought you were scum..RW wrote:Having written that, I am not sure he is doing it because he is scum or if he did it to keep from being lynched himself.
Zaphod and JScope both dropped the "nice catch", so I can agree that one of them is likely scum. JScope clearly wanted you lynched anyway, so I'd lean Zaphod.RW wrote:Regardless, the subsequent discussion between Zaphod and ZMD contain scum. It is one or the other and I am certain their partner is J-Scope now.
I don't understand why one of two people attacking each other has to be scum.RW wrote:There shouldn't be any doubt either me or J-Scope are scum, so if I flip town he should be your next lynch.
I don’t think it’s noteworthy that Nyballs suspected Yosariwen more than most people.nyballs wrote:Top two candidates on my list right now are Raging Wishbone and ZMD. Both made the ridiculous attempt of painting Frog Dodging as possessing confidence that they wouldn't die by taking their post out of content.
I’m ready to believe this perception of Post 141 and that as a catchup post there was some legitimacy to talk about something that was over and done with.Zaphod wrote:2. The SK has been caught and lynched and is dead; that's excellent news. Now I need to go back for more tells and analysis. Grrr Smile.
I meant interpretation #2 (noting that the town lynched the SK while I was out). I could see that one might interpret it as #1 (personal gloating, including gloating for the work of a hydra buddy); I tried, and continue to try, to clarify.
This concerns me mildly because I feel that Zaphod is trying to draw attention to the fact that she is not paying attention to shaft.ed. People should naturally be concerned when a player ignores another player, so you’d think said player would not want to make it known they are doing a suspicious thing by ignoring another player. And that other player flipped scum.Zaphod wrote:Hey shaft.ed I didn't know you were in this game... you might be upset at the innuendo suggested by one of the hydra's name... give my regards to your wife.
This is just such a bizarre tell but when I try to take out the emotion between Trotsky and Zaphod present at the time, I think this failure to tunnel is just a bad point and was pushed for too long.Zaphod wrote:Furthermore, as of late, I also have never, ever seen you fail to stubbornly tunnel on me. I must therefore conclude that you are scum.
This was before the Trotsky wagon even existed and Zaphod was done trying to play with Trotsky. It looks like it could be an attempt not to push the wagon using emotion as a tool, when in reality Zaphod was helping to push the wagon just by saying this.Zaphod wrote:I don't remember it, and everything you do is to irritate me anyway, so buzz off, scum. I don't care to answer your questions or interact with you but for the fact that you're a scumbag in this game and you should be dead already.
I feel that they were pushing the Trotsky wagon pretty solidly while staying on the outside of it just so they could come back and say they were scumdriving a wagon.Zaphod wrote:I'm pretty sure there's a lot of scum on Trotsky's wagon, because beyond gut reads, there wasn't much of a case, roflcopter's habit of lurking as scum gave him away.
I'm very sad not to be on that list, but paradoxically I'd be delighted to vote any player that is on it. How 'bout that.
I'm not so sure I agree with that conclusion.J-scope wrote:I’m not very gung-ho about a ZMD lynch. He brought up a valid point against RW when it already looked like RW was going to be lynched, which tells me ZMD was trying to make the best choice and not just save his skin in that instance.
And they hadn't really voiced arguments against RW except that voting analysis where everyone in a lynching wagon except 2 first and hammer get scumpoints.Zmd wrote: Vote Raging Wishbone. It's me or them. That suits me fine because they are my top suspect anyway.
There may be a relation. I can't prove that there is.J-Scope wrote:Do you think the second statement is related to the first? Who are the lurkers you have in mind?Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:It took forever for the scum kill to go through. I'm interested in two players that lurked hard.
Then she catches up at some point? But doesn't share her views or stance on the game/agrees with you on everything? All your posts between the RW contradictory attack question from ZazieR and the previous statement are explanations of what you meant before or meta defence of Kmd or similar material seemingly derived from Kmd's earlier thoughts in thread.Kmd in 305 wrote:We actually haven't talked much about the game. She is way too far behind to know what is going on. V__V
Zaphod, your wording and lurking theory implies you would expect the scum to kill earlier rather than later in the day. Can you explain why? Considering that the rules say pending kills resolve after a lynch anyway, I don't really see the incentive.Zaphod wrote:It took forever for the scum kill to go through.
What took so long for that one to resolve? It occurred before the lynch, no?Ojanen wrote:Considering that the rules say pending kills resolve after a lynch anyway, I don't really see the incentive.
True, except that Yosariwen had little to do with said drama.Ojando wrote:Ummm?
Yes, it occured before the lynch, but I was asking what you see as the incentive to choose/send in a kill rather earlier than later in the day (that seemed to be the tacit assumption behind thinking the kill took forever to happen)? Cause it must have been sent in 26th or 27th and that coincides with RW's claim and the drama that was seeming to end the day soon and the doc's target named, which I thought would have been relevant.
Not really. I talked to her on AIM and mentioned how I thought RW said something, but couldn't find it and she found it for me.Ojando wrote:Then she catches up at some point?
Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:We have 3 scum left, not 2?
Fixed. >.<Zmd wrote:Zaphod, by suspecting lurkers just because of the amount of time it took for a kill, you are saying thatBOTHscum are lurking. That would effectively clear JScope, you, and myself. I'm not at all comfortable clearing you and JScope just yet.
Not really. I talked to her on AIM and mentioned how I thought RW said something, but couldn't find it and she found it for me.Ojando wrote:Then she catches up at some point?
Pretty sure from 19 June to 23 June we were in twilight awaiting rule changes. I know we could post, but no votes counted AFAIK, and considering how much work goes into this game, at least prior to the rule changes, it seemed like a convenient time to relax for a bit while waiting for the rule changes.Zahop wrote:LURKED
5. Ojando Death the Hogfather Lurked from June 17-26
8. Ortohoops Lurked from June 12-24
10. PoketheAlpaca June 14-20, June 20-26
11. nyballosulgniirkps Pesco Light June 9-17 and June 17-26
14. Frog Dodging June 9-15, June 15-21