Zmd:
J-Scope:
not voting:
~~~
~~~
Countdown Timer to Deadline
not voting:
I can't really tell why they changed their position and they aren't trying to form a new one, instead asking someone else to come up with a suspect.Zaphod wrote:Zmd you're pulling at my heartstrings and now I think you're town again.
Who's the scum?
Except move nyballs below Ojando and Ortohoops because I don't have reason to place nyballs as scum currently, and my bad feelings about Ojando and Orto.ZMD wrote:I'd be ok lynching Zaphod or JScope. I'd be willing to lynch ny. I could compromise on Ojando or Ortohoops if needed. I will NOT vote FD or PtA (or myself obviously).
If the no-kill is a byproduct of a roleblocker, someone knows who a scum is.J-Scope wrote:I think the no-kill could be the result of a power role, though there's nothing to indicate that either way.
Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:Half-Zaphod is baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaack!
I found this funny, is it just me?Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:THIS needs elucidation.Ojando wrote:There was no kill last game day.
I'm also currently trying to reread.
Am I right that the scum is lurking?
Pretty sure they meant this thread, would seem very odd to post that you're rereading a different game...J-Scope wrote:@People re-reading: What in particular are you reading?
It's interesting that you apparently agree with some of his rankings even though he has you as top 2/equal first in his suspects. You need to explain why you could both be town and he could have a similar mentality to you about finding the scum, but place you so highly in his suspects.J-Scope (463) wrote:There's not much I'm learning from ZMD's gut opinions now that he's known town. I do agree on some of his rankings like in this post:Except move nyballs below Ojando and Ortohoops because I don't have reason to place nyballs as scum currently, and my bad feelings about Ojando and Orto.ZMD wrote:I'd be ok lynching Zaphod or JScope. I'd be willing to lynch ny. I could compromise on Ojando or Ortohoops if needed. I will NOT vote FD or PtA (or myself obviously).
If you re-read my subsequent posts you'll see you're entirely re-treading old ground. I made that post because I was in a rush to beat the prod, if you read my next post I addressed this point after Yos brought it up. When you say your bad feeling "starts" at that point- is there any more substance to it, or are you just re-treading the points Yos and PTA already made?J-Scope (463) wrote:I also have a bad feeling about Ortohoops and it starts with how long it took for them after shaft.ed died for them to comment on it or use that knowledge to scumhunt.
Their first post after the shaft.ed flip was almost 5 days but in that post they didn't mention shaft.ed at all. Not even to say they will go and look for connections, etc.
@Orto: Why didn't you acknowledge the flip in that first post?
It needs "elucidation" as in "solving the mystery of why there was no kill." No "clarification" is needed.Ojando wrote:Zaphod, what do you mean by the elucidation comment? Ojanen's post seems very clear to me, are you saying that it deserves more comment on how/why there was no kill, or are you actually asking for clarification of the post?
It's not a full and convincing argument, but a small point we may want to consider.Ojando wrote:Zaphod, are you still basing you suspicions off whoever lurked and didn't? It was a pretty weak argument when you first brought it up and claimed that people lurking through a twilight with rule changes pending was scummy, and you seem to have backed off actually accusing anyone and just saying that scum are lurking, loosely based around no kill yesterday.
Why is a roleblocker the first thing that comes to your mind?Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:If the no-kill is a byproduct of a roleblocker, someone knows who a scum is.J-Scope wrote:I think the no-kill could be the result of a power role, though there's nothing to indicate that either way.
We lynched a doctor that was not counterclaimed. I suppose there are possibilities beyond roleblocker, but I was too intellectually lazy to think about them since we don't have claims out there.populartajo wrote:Why is a roleblocker the first thing that comes to your mind?