Pirates Mafia - GAME OVER

[PeaceBringer]

okay Nanook has vig claims and claimed no kill so we have another night killer then is what I meant. CLaw kills is different then strangalation.

[Internet Stranger]

Whatever, this is not one of those days where you can just get away from me knowing full well that youre just some two bit scum. I think I been in like three games with you now, and this the clearest one where I can see you made a lousy role claim.

Face it, Internet Stranger has caught himself another scum. Were you not the one urging us to lynch Peter Pan? Thats what we get for listening to you, and now you expect us to follow you blindly again? I think not.

Vote: Peacebringer

Im going to be so dissapointed if this day doesnt end quickly, we got us a sure one here.

[PeaceBringer]

Whatever, this is not one of those days where you can just get away from me knowing full well that youre just some two bit scum. I think I been in like three games with you now, and this the clearest one where I can see you made a lousy role claim.

Face it, Internet Stranger has caught himself another scum. Were you not the one urging us to lynch Peter Pan? Thats what we get for listening to you, and now you expect us to follow you blindly again? I think not.

Vote: Peacebringer

Im going to be so dissapointed if this day doesnt end quickly, we got us a sure one here.

Oh that is rich IS, real rich. How did I push Fuldu exactly. Heck I even backed off the vote before deciding on the lynch. This must be scum IS.

I shall recast the

vote IS

and would like your full claim. You like FD who was scum have conviently left out a lot of details.

[mole]

FD was scum?

[PeaceBringer]

yup, FD was barmaid who drugged people, doesn't sound Good guy to me.

[PeaceBringer]

Day 5

Flying Ducthman (Barmaid)
At night you can serve drugged ale to a target player. If they drink, you can easily rummage through their things and learn more about them, this also disables most defensive abillities.


(Sorry, I forgot the other death! )

I read that role as being scum especially the disable defensive abilities.

[Internet Stranger]

Im going to lose my ability, but I guess its worth it for the slam dunk. Why dont you really read my posts and notice the pattern?

I told you that im the damn gypsy, I hypnotize people with my posting. Anytime I use the words, "one, two, three, Internet Stranger" in that order in a post, the next person who posts is roleblocked the next night.

Thats why when FD noticed something fishy about me, notice he threw attention my way and backed off once he figured out what I was doing. He would have raised hell yesterday if my claim wasnt true.

This also coincides with the fact I said that I dont send a nightchoice, because I dont.

Please stop clutching at straws dude, you have been caught. This little fallacy of trying to claim FD evil when everyone can clearly see he isnt listed as evil is a farce. Just give up and proclaim yourself caught.

Now lets see those votes!

[inHimshallibe]

FOS : PeaceBringer

Maybe it's just an oversight on your part, but I definitely think it's obvious that FD is pro-town. He's not a pirate, which is the scum in this game.

[PeaceBringer]

well if FD was not scum, which is how I interpret the role write up.

well if your claim is true In Him will not be able to act.

your claim IS fits with clock maker.

If there are 3 scum left lynch me and lose- I am simply a townie.

So real easy target. I have nothing to claim. There are townies in this game- do you believe there was only one, pheobus?

So this is my thinking-

If Is right then In Him cannot act-

Therefore I

unvote, vote Nanook

based on strangulation not being a very vigilante style of killing
but I am still very suspiscious of IS and subsequently Inhim.

[Foolster41]

Sorry, me again. I thought I should point out that I had forgotten to include the Flying Dutchman's Motivation Tag. Flying Dutchman was pro-town. Sorry for any confusion (Again ) Please see the dawn post again for the re-fixed post.

[inHimshallibe]

Hmmm. . . I took IS's role to mean that he only blocks one person, being the one after his initial "one, two, three" post.

[Internet Stranger]

Not anymore. I revealed my ability, there wont be any roleblocking tonight or later on.

[PeaceBringer]

Not anymore. I revealed my ability, there wont be any roleblocking tonight or later on.

actually

Unvote

and want feedback from others

[mole]

I'm most suspicious of inHim, for claiming doctor and then revealing his previous choices, giving the mafia a big "hey!! FD won't be protected tonight!" tip.

I blocked PeaceBringer last night, so he didn't make either of the kills...

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

the pacifist could've protected FD as well....

Is there anyone whom was roleblocked by IS who got a night message about it?

I find the townie claim at this point to be the most suscipcious one though we do need to choose a target for Nanook tonight as we are out of options otherwise

[mole]

What's the point of me protecting the cop if it means he's blocked as well?

[olio]

Re-reading before conclusions.

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

because next night inhim can protect the cop?

also the cop is more or less a guranteed innocent because of his identification of the pacifist and a highly probable mafia target.

[Flying Dutchman]

Well, Bah!!!

[olio]

PeaceBringer and mole, why are you suspicious about InHim? He's only doc in the game - you doubt there hasn't been one at all?

Innocents:
Pooky - butler, but I'm not sure if he can be/is already recruited. Serving Rich Lord surely leaves some scars.
inHimshallbe - doctor, only one in game; there got to be one.
olio - mason

Gray area:
mole - fighting for peace and innocent have been proven by two investigators, but he can be godfather, though fighting for peace is a strong argument against that if you read the description of this game

Scummy:
Peacebringer2 - townie, unbelieveable role-name compared to one Phoebus had
IS - blocker, contradictions in blocking:
D1 inHim after post 62 <-- inHim hasn't mentioned anything about this
D2 mr.pink after post 245
D3 Fuldu after post 305 <-- doesn't add, as Fuldu gave result from N3
D4 Fuldu after post 399
NanookTheWolf - vigilante, strangling doesn't sounds more like SK than pro-town method of killing

Any thoughts?

[olio]

Argh...
strangling

does

sound more like SK than pro-town method of killing

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

Night one we had 2 kills

one can be attributed to the Mafia

however the other one must've come from a second SK as Captain Hook was blocked by Quailman's selling of watches/clocks.
(I highly doubt that a vigilante would act on N1)

However we've seen this second kill change in type from strangulation to claws to sword.

I believe what we have here is a second SK who can change weapons(Rope for strangling, Sword for stabbing)

I believe Nanook is this SK,
He used one type of kill mechanism earlier, then switched in order to back up his vigilante claim and now he has decided to stop killing in order to lie low.

[NanookTheWolf]

You believe that I am the sk? Have you forgotten that we already killed an sk, you know the one you just mentioned, captain hook. Do you really think that there would be two sk's in this game, and even if your argument is that that is what you think that I am, wouldn't it be better to try and get rid of mafia right now? I mean if we are in a close loss for the town, believe it or not the mafia is the one that you want to get rid of before the sk seeing as how their numbers are greater.

I've said this earlier, lynch me if you want, but I'm telling the truth and to be quite honest I was quite surprised myself to find two vigs in the game.

Another note too, I don't recall who said this earlier, but there was mentioning of me possibly changing my killing style, uh what? I don't think that I am exactly aloud to do that, and I told you that I didn't kill last night which was true, but take in what you will.

[mole]

Does your role have a name?

[PeaceBringer]

Pooky, what on earth are you rambling about.

I am really beginning to wonder if a player could be shanghied and if so pooky could have been recruite possibly or just playing horridly.

There was a vig. Quailman and Spork were killed by PB1 with the use of the sword. Thus my questions on Nanook.

Olio, reasons for suspiscions on InHim-- someone has to be scum in this mess. Oh and FD not being protected is troublesome.


Olio and Pooky by the role seem clean


Mole confirmed by 2 different information roles.

Nanook claims a vig that strangles

IS claims his role was a text driven role blocker-- which is possible but the shakiest of all claims.

I know I am clean but the rest of you don't. And yes the mod gave me a different name for role then Phoebus. Why would I not use the same word if it were anything else?

I can understand the desire to come after me. Here is the deal, if you decide that I am the best vote you better be sure that this is the direction you want to go. We may be at an end game sitution here given the probable # of bad guys in the game. However the #s don't seem to be there with the people left for 3 BGs. Clearly there was some one who kills differently then Nanook. So it looks like there is a seperate serial killer at at least one scum. I am stuck between Pooky if can shanghai, Inhim and IS. The seperate kill seems to point to nanook as truthful.

Therefore I vote IS his claim is most spurious.