This, in my opinion, is not a great reason. Voting for me and putting me at three votes on page 3 isint what u should do to move the game.Pimj wrote:I did, because it was one of the few, if not, the only, vote which would move the game. I don't truly believe FC is scum either. And thoughI do find him criticising the first substantial post silly at least. I normally wouldn't have voted him for simply that reason, but it did get the game started (somewhat).
Let me guess, this is your slayer's gambit again?saberwolf wrote:FC and I have had some small scuffles in the past...I'm simply trying to keep that little moment of ours alive lol
There's no way he'd make a mistake this early in the game, but I figured I'd might as well start a BW onsomeone, and it's already got one other person on board thus far...
Devestation wrote:It is wise to come up with a good reason to do the
bandwagon in the first place. Mine is that Far Cry is best positioned for one
unvote, vote Far_Cry.
This is strange. Is there a specific reason u do this??Devestation wrote:unvote
Kidding
Personally I am against bandwagons for the sake of them unless you seriously think someone should be on the recieving end of a noose. I can't see anyone that fits that criteria yet.
What do u find scummy about saber and I?Sudai wrote:Unvote
Yes, I know my vote was there before, but that was my RVS vote. This is an actual vote.
Pimj, has yet to contribute anything. 8 post. 1 confirm, 3 during RVS/RVS-Chatter. I'm going to ignore those first 4 post since they really don't matter.
From there we have 3 post that essentially do nothing for the game. "It might help if you read the thread?" (Pimj 89). In 80, Pimj asked for a clarification on where someone's accusation landed. In 98, he defends himself. In 59 he defends Toast and votes FC without reason (He gives the reason in 98 and it's not a very solid reason).
Pimj, you claim that your vote moved the game, but it went nowhere.
Vote: PimjYes, I know my vote was there before, but that was my RVS vote. This is an actual vote.
FoS: Saberwolf and Far_Cry
I don't want to get into the reasoning for these two just yet because I want to see if they change what is making them scummy in my eyes.
of course I'm gonna shove it off to the side...all he did was claim im scummy, with no backing up of it whatsoever. I certainly haven't been supertown either, I haven't achieved much more than pointless chatter, which much of you can't claim any better, if any.donkeyz12212 wrote:Saberwolf, I feel like you're trying to give yourself so much credit for appearing town and shoving off any suspicion on yourself to the side. The way you post, your mannerisms at least in the latest posts is a bit sporadic and just suspicious to me.
You say you haven't done anything scummy but just the way you present yourself recently shows that you are in a way.
unvote, vote: saberwolf
??? Why not just point it out already? Don't "wait for them to change it"! Epic buddying up!FoS: Saberwolf and Far_Cry
I don't want to get into the reasoning for these two just yet because I want to see if they change what is making them scummy in my eyes.
What I said before wasn't entirely clear. Srry for that.RealityFan wrote:Why did Devestation's vote make you decide between those two? What changed?
Their actions. They've been acting very suspicious thus far.Toast wrote:Why were you under the impression that one or the other has to be scum?Far_Cry wrote:Devestation's vote put me at an interesting dilemma: who is scum: Sudai, or Pimj? It could be both but that is unlikely in my eyes. It could me neither but I'm not about to believe that.
And why couldnt you go after Sudai before?FC wrote:What I said before wasn't entirely clear. Srry for that.
What I'm saying is, who should I pursue? Devestation's vote opened up something interesting.
Far_Cry wrote:What do u find scummy about saber and I?
Don't worry guys, I plan to tell y'all what it is. Now's not the time, though, as I need to collect more data before the point becomes valid. Though I do find it interesting how defensive Saberwolf became simply from my FoS, even after he said he was going to simply dismiss it.Saberwolf wrote:I'm just gonna dismiss sudai's FoS. I know I haven't done anything scummy. I've had an honest RVS, explained my BW attempt on FC, and attempted to get this game going. It could of been a conversation prompter, but it isn't going to do much in my opinion...five posts later maybe and we'll be back where we started. Later on in the game if FC doesnt force it out of him earlier, I'll have him explain his actions.
How am I being a hypocrite? I've been asking questions, explaing my accusations (save for the recent FC and Saberwolf FoS), and trying to contribute. Like I said before, Pimj hasn't done any scum hunting at all, but he's had time to at least look as active as most people in the thread.Devestation wrote:FoS: Sudai
Hypocrisy sucks, I havent seen your 8 posts. I havent seen MY 8 posts either.
It's not that I want to them to change their behavior, but I want to see if they do. I'll explain it all better once I have a better read on exactly what I'm looking at. Essentially, I'm trying to figure out if their actions are actually scummy or just bad town play and I wanted to put my suspicions out in the open.Devestation wrote:??? Why not just point it out already? Don't "wait for them to change it"! Epic buddying up!
I could hav gone after Sudai before. However, what I'm saying is that this opens up possibilities to both town and scum.RealityFan wrote:And why couldnt you go after Sudai before?FC wrote:What I said before wasn't entirely clear. Srry for that.
What I'm saying is, who should I pursue? Devestation's vote opened up something interesting.
You want me to explain why their actions are scummy? I'll have something up in a bit.Toast wrote:I figured as much. Could you be more specific? Unless I missed something in your iso, you never really gave reasons. Elaborate a bit.
Also:FoSon everyone who hasn't contributed anything.
RealityFan wrote:And why couldnt you go after Sudai before?FC wrote:What I said before wasn't entirely clear. Srry for that.
What I'm saying is, who should I pursue? Devestation's vote opened up something interesting.
Pimj wrote:*confirms*
Pimj wrote:Vote: Everyone who made an illegal post.
Donkeyz hasn't confirmed. I ought we should wait for him, right?
Pimj wrote:Jackinthebox
Technically, that would be a jack, but you could still wonder what else is inside the box. Just think outside the box!
Vote: Devestation
Absolutely nothing in any of these posts.Pimj wrote:Well, if there's a cat in any box it has to be both dead and alive.
This sounds like major protection of Toast. And then he goes on to vote for me for not a very valid reason.Pimj wrote:To be honest, Toasts post doesn't look scummy to me. If he wouldn't have posted it, I would have done something similar. Simply for the reason that a bunch of random votes and box jokes are not really helping the game.
Vote: Far cry
Pimj wrote:"newb stuff" Fair enough. I am a newb, this being my second game.
RF, I can't really see whether you are refering to my post, or Far_cry's. Or Far_cry saying toast looked scummy? (I first thought it was my post, but please specify)
Nothing in the above 2 posts.Pimj wrote:It might help if you read the thread?
Ummm, what??? U dont find me scum but u still hav a vote on me. And I dont understand why u find my "critising the first substantial post" silly. Not only that, what I bolded and underlined shows that you are really trying to protect Toast.Pimj wrote:I did, because it was one of the few, if not, the only, vote which would move the game. I don't truly believe FC is scum either. And thoughI do find him criticising the. I normally wouldn't have voted him for simply that reason, but it did get the game started (somewhat).first substantial postsilly at least
