Mini 844 - P-p-plain! - Over

Pomegranate · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 11:04 am

Kmd4390 wrote:Pom, why no Keelie vote?

Because her name is too long to type.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 11:48 am

Vote: Plum

Rosso says so. And if we cant trust Rosso, who can we trust

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 11:48 am

[]===

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 11:49 am

===[]

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 11:49 am

This game is slow

CoCo · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 11:51 am

NO! You're slow...

AlmasterGM · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 12:30 pm

Kmd4390 wrote:Pom, why no Keelie vote?

Because plum is obviously scum. The rhyme is just so catchy!

Kmd4390 · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:42 pm

Pom, you could shorten it.

Alm, what does Plum have to do with Pom not voting Keelie?

Pomegranate · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:50 pm

Kmd4390 wrote:Pom, you could shorten it.

Alm, what does Plum have to do with Pom not voting Keelie?

Kay then,

Unvote, Vote: Keelie

for having a name that's too long.

Same question directed at Alm.

Raivann · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:37 pm

Vote:Keelie

for wagon's sake

AlmasterGM · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:08 pm

Kmd4390 wrote:Alm, what does Plum have to do with Pom not voting Keelie?

Nothing? When did I even reference Pom?

Pomegranate · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:39 pm

AlmasterGM wrote:
Kmd4390 wrote:Pom, why no Keelie vote?
Because plum is obviously scum. The rhyme is just so catchy!

Alm, you referenced me here.

AlmasterGM · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:45 pm

Pomegranate wrote:
AlmasterGM wrote:
Kmd4390 wrote:Pom, why no Keelie vote?
Because plum is obviously scum. The rhyme is just so catchy!
Alm, you referenced me here.

Oh ... misread. My bad. Pom and Plum just looked similar to me.

CoCo · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:59 pm

Unvote.
Vote Alm.

They share one letter. It isn't

that

similar.

CoCo · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:00 pm

Lol, two letters.

Unvote

KeelieRavenWolf · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 6:32 pm

I vote KMD.
Because he's so obsessed with getting me lynched.

CoCo · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 6:55 pm

Why would he be so obsessed?

KeelieRavenWolf · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:16 pm

Well he's the one who suggested I join this site.
We're coworkers, you see.
I can't believe he's trying to lynch me round one.
>.<

CoCo · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:17 pm

KeelieRavenWolf wrote:Well he's the one who suggested I join this site.
We're coworkers, you see.
I can't believe he's trying to lynch me round one.
>.<

That's meta.
Who's to say the two of you would not discuss this game at work?

KeelieRavenWolf · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:21 pm

HAH.
Why should I?
That would be against the rules.
Besides, I have not spoken to him since game start.

CoCo · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:33 pm

How do we know?

KeelieRavenWolf · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:43 pm

You don't.
I still vote KMD.

lewarcher82 · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:07 pm

vote: KeelieRavenWolf

but I honestly don't see how one could decide to vote somebody on day 1... I guess this is not even a spread votes strategy: this is the problem with day-start games... if at the end of this BW we lynch someone important, I hope tomorrow we will punish who started it...

lewarcher82 · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:12 pm

naturally, I would be easy convinced that this bw is pointless, if only Keelie was a little more interested in defending herself...

lewarcher82 · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:42 am

well, looks like the different timing zones are making me be active while you guys all sleep... anyway, on second thought, this BW is totally pointless, I would like to test some other reactions. Hence:

Unvote. Vote: CoCo.