In post 767, RandomActs wrote: In post 762, HowardRoark wrote:Not wanting to give a claimed vigilante an honest chance to prove his claim is WRONG! I understand the case against him, but it's not enough to miss a chance to confirm a slot as town. If there's only a single death tonight, he can be lynched tomorrow.
The claim has
already
been proved false. Two nights have passed and no extra NK's. I still maintain Smear's the surest scum to lynch.
Technically, you are completely wrong. The fact that he has offered up an excuse, that if true, would explain the absence of additional deaths, means that nothing has been proven.
I most certainly would not. If we are going to put off your death, which it's probably best that we do despite how obviously scum you are, then it's best that we give you the best possible chance for you to prove yourself by letting your shot through. If you are Vig, then announcing your target just increases the chances that scum will try to shoot at the same person as you so that we'll mislynch you tomorrow. I may have an idea up my sleeve though. I'll post my idea for you and the Doc tomorrow and we can decide on a redFF or GNR lynch.
I need to reevaluate both to see which has the greater chance of flipping scum. GNR has had an extremely newbie edge to him the entire time, but at the same time, his complete lack of content and some of his more questionable comments have me wondering. On the other hand, redFF has tunneled on people hard for fairly illegitimate reasons. Still, something about his recent posts reads town. Not his "lol scum team caught" attitude, but the other stuff.
This is probably going to be a hard sell because the majority of my case here is lack of content, but I'd honestly say that I think RandomActs might be the best candidate, because we're a bit close to the deadline and I don't think there is enough time to fully evaluate bvoigt. Again, this is something I'll have to elaborate on tomorrow.
