In post 312, zoraster wrote:I certainly don't begrudge Magua winning an award even if I think our game should have won it instead.
What you've been doing kind of looks precisely like begrudging Magua winning an award though.
I mean
I don't think it's necessarily wrong to say that Magua was a deserving winner, but shouldn't have won.
"oh second place should have been FINE for Magua! He did such a good job."
Now, and listen to this--
Based on wild hearsay that I might just be making up but I'm probably not, there were four-ish games in contention for the award.
*Maf. MetaMafia
*RPG Maf.
*Team Maf.
*Marketplace Maf.
off the top of my head.
All of them took a ludicrous amount of effort over and beyond your average game, were mechanically successful, and would all be good candidates for an award. Furthermore, Scummies aren't AFAIK intended to be some lifetime achievement award (unless you're MeMe); they're roughly a measure of who's hot right now. Would it be wrong or otherwise a bad idea to turn the winner-takes-all Scummies we have now and create a one-to-five-person WINNING! tier over and above the rest of the nominees?
Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.