NomicScum, Game 2

Feirei · Post Post #650 (ISO) » Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:21 pm

Whoever was voted in after your disappearance minus myself.

Kcdaspot · Post Post #651 (ISO) » Wed Jul 11, 2012 3:45 pm

jack
me
jdga
packbat
and robotnick

Packbat · Post Post #652 (ISO) » Thu Jul 12, 2012 2:35 am

Okay - I'm sorry, I have no mojo today. If anyone wants to update the Wiki, I will be quite grateful; otherwise, I'll take a crack at it when I can.

Robotnick2 · Post Post #653 (ISO) » Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:37 am

Aye

Also, I'll do stuff on the Wiki for now. Feel free to amend as you wish though.

Feirei · Post Post #654 (ISO) » Sat Jul 14, 2012 8:39 am

Bump.

Kcdaspot · Post Post #655 (ISO) » Sat Jul 14, 2012 9:28 am

PACKBAT GEt IN HERE

Feirei · Post Post #656 (ISO) » Sat Jul 14, 2012 9:34 am

Also, guys, you could have been nice and let me stay via Rule 202. (Just skipping me and moving on)

By Rule 203: the vote has until the end of the day (in said timezone from which the rules operate from), as his turn began over one week ago.

Packbat · Post Post #657 (ISO) » Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:27 pm

Sorry - VOTE: Aye

Robotnick2 · Post Post #658 (ISO) » Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:45 am

In post 656, Feirei wrote:Also, guys, you could have been nice and let me stay via Rule 202. (Just skipping me and moving on)

By Rule 203: the vote has until the end of the day (in said timezone from which the rules operate from), as his turn began over one week ago.

"When a rule-change has been brought to vote, each player shall be given one game week to vote on that rule change."
Soyeah, voting would have closed next Saturday. As it is, voting's closed, with an Aye result. As I understand it, jackofspades receives 13 points?

Robotnick2 · Post Post #659 (ISO) » Fri Jul 20, 2012 4:32 am

Bump.

Packbat · Post Post #660 (ISO) » Fri Jul 20, 2012 5:08 am

Right - JDGA should have been prodded. I'll do that now.

Packbat · Post Post #661 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2012 3:19 pm

JDGA has not picked up the prod within 24 hours. Kcdaspot, you're up.

JDGA · Post Post #662 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2012 3:33 pm

I swear, the problem with being on during school when I don't often have that much time is that I'll forget about it and I won't think to check it again because no new posts/PMs >_<

Packbat · Post Post #663 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:13 pm

I know how that is. :/

Kcdaspot · Post Post #664 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2012 5:08 pm

the vote didnt pass?

Feirei · Post Post #665 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2012 5:13 pm

It did.

Kcdaspot · Post Post #666 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:37 pm

okay.. thinking....

Kcdaspot · Post Post #667 (ISO) » Tue Jul 24, 2012 7:38 am

---
Should a rule change fail to pass and the player who submitted said rule change is more than half way to the goal score dictated in (insert rule here), then he/she will be deducted one fourth of the score he or she would have gotten if the rule have passed and will be further penalized 1 point per "no" vote.
---

We need some balance. And if you are halfway to the goal score, that means you got a prop to pass and should be able to make another pass anyway. and the penalty is small enough in of itself that no one can seriously abuse it to "troll" anyone to a excessive degree.

Packbat · Post Post #668 (ISO) » Tue Jul 24, 2012 7:46 am

It's more intricate than I like. Also, there's already a penalty of 10 points for failed proposals - why not allow that penalty to grow for people who are past 50% of the winning score?

(Also: I don't like specifying rule numbers, as a rule. Replacing "the goal score dictated in (insert rule here)" with "the score required to win the game on points" or some such?)

Kcdaspot · Post Post #669 (ISO) » Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:34 am

kay...

---
Should a rule change fail to pass and the

competitor

who submitted said rule change is more than half way

to the score required to win the game on points

, then he/she will be deducted,

on top of the normal penalty of 10 points

,

one eighth

of the score he or she would have gotten if the rule

had

passed and will be further penalized 1 point

for every 20 he/she is above 50% of the score to win on points.

---

how to fix repetition? it's seems pedantic to have the same phrase repeat but i cant think of a proper alternative phrasing...

EDIT: changes are in bold...

also what rule # is this? 305?

just checked... it's indeed 305

also another edit in bold italics

Kcdaspot · Post Post #670 (ISO) » Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:43 am

also also: i did seriously almost consider making a troll rule to give eeryone crazy posting restrictions except when writing a rule. meaning when a proposal is put up for discussion the proposal itself may be in plain English but the discussion must adhere to the PRs. also voting is normal.

Packbat · Post Post #671 (ISO) » Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:44 am

I would suggest amending 207 instead of making a new rule, but that's reasonable. Which way do fractions round?

Kcdaspot · Post Post #672 (ISO) » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:13 am

down. i'll fix.

---
Should a rule change fail to pass and the competitor who submitted said rule change is more than half way to the score required to win the game on points, then he/she will be deducted, on top of the normal penalty of 10 points, one eighth of the score he or she would have gotten if the rule had passed

rounded down

and will be further penalized 1 point for every 20 he/she is above 50% of the score to win on points.
---

Kcdaspot · Post Post #673 (ISO) » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:15 am

where is everyone else? i want discussion.

Packbat · Post Post #674 (ISO) » Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:25 pm

In post 673, Kcdaspot wrote:where is everyone else? i want discussion.

Dunno - send them a PM, perhaps?