Wow so this isn't progressing very fast. I thought my opening post would kinda speed up RVS... Content time!
In post 3, Cheery Dog wrote:So I see you are capable of rolling dice and seeing if they align.
they don't, my goon is clearly Seanald.
Post is innocuous enough I suppose, but I notice that you posted only a few minutes after me even though the game had been open for hours. @Cheery Dog, was that a coincidence or did you not want to be the first to post?
In post 4, Seanald wrote:Robert Montana I accept you as my master lead me into your arms of safety and trust.
VOTE: CheeryDog
Drawing unnecessary attention makes me think town, but that is hella WIFOM-loaded really.
In post 9, Natural_river wrote:I have several questions for you guys.
1.) If you had the choice to save a suicidal unknown homeless man, but have to lose your wealth in doing so, would you?
And why?
2.) It's cold and snowing outside, the grocery store is just around the corner, you could put on your snow clothes, but then you might
not make it in time to get food for Christmas dinner.
Would you go out anyway and risk the cold? Or put it on anyway and be warm, but possibly without Christmas dinner?
3.) What is in my pocket?
Hope you guys answer these, it would clear up a lot on who is who in my mind.
I am not answering random questions (particularly when they are actually random). Job of town is to make the game clearer and this stuff just lets scum post answers instead of content to glide by. Drawing even more attention than Seanald also feels town but again, WIFOM.
Also, the exchange between Seanald and natural river (apart from making me want two days of policy lynches
) is interesting. I highly doubt they are two scum talking to one another, but could either be both town or one town and one scum. The latter would mean one derptown not wanting to get out of RVS and one scum trying to seem active without content because they can't fake scumhunt.
In post 12, Cheery Dog wrote:I have christmas in summer (although it doesn't snow here at all anyway, but I had to answer the question in regards to that, in which it would be winter)
I understand why RQS exists, however I don't see how it helps. I will answer them because my hatred of it isn't that big, and in the hope it actually helps prove something one of these times.
Your questions don't give anything towards anybodies alignment, and are therefore unless in the game.
As stated, I agree with the sentiment. Interesting that you answered anyway, because in essence by doing so, you are committing the same sin of substituting randomness for content.
In post 16, Mehdi2277 wrote:I don't want to answer the questions, nor do I plan to.
Next
VOTE: natural river. Mainly because what's wrong with the wagon on cheery? Going off your tone you questioned seanald for making a wagon on cheery and I don't see anything wrong with that.
I really do not like this vote. Starts off well enough (although possibly paranoid scum at giving away reads), but the logic on natural river is poor. The vote is based on natural river's first vote which was obviously very RVS. Given that there ARE better reasons to suspect natural river/seanald (their conversation obfuscating alignment), I do not like that you voted him for an RVS vote.
To me, it feels like early day bussing: Mehdiscum busses natural river to distance, but uses a reason that means the wagon will never get traction.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Mehdi
