Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:56 am
agreed
In post 3898, SleepyKrew wrote:House of Lies will look bad under her name
Agree.
Mafiascum.net
Yet Another Dance of the Title Fairy: Change Up
Page 157 of 173
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:57 am
Agree.
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:59 am
Hm, I don't think so.
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:21 am
oh. that's a good point.
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:23 am
Can anyone make a mock up of it? I've seem those before in this thread but I don't know how
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:32 am
looks okay to me
(I forget what font we use but it's close enough)
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:33 am
Put it together? HouseOfLies
(Don't know if that even makes sense, I don't have access to the source thread.)
(Don't know if that even makes sense, I don't have access to the source thread.)
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:33 am
generally speaking, if it's got part of the username in it, it's a bad title
this applies here
this applies here
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:36 am
Lying house?
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:38 am
That is so much worse
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:49 am
@quadz: I'm going to be the person to bring up Khan Man because someone always does
the tl;dr of the thread was a house-related hypothetical situation. to quote while still keeping things vague because speakeasy - "What's great is that there is literally ONE person in this thread who gets it, and everyone else only thinks they do."
the thread isn't actually ABOUT a house, therefore it could be considered a 'house of lies', the username pun/relevance just makes it fit better.
the tl;dr of the thread was a house-related hypothetical situation. to quote while still keeping things vague because speakeasy - "What's great is that there is literally ONE person in this thread who gets it, and everyone else only thinks they do."
the thread isn't actually ABOUT a house, therefore it could be considered a 'house of lies', the username pun/relevance just makes it fit better.
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 11:05 am
Khan Man is not a good title, as previously discussed in this thread here
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 11:06 am
Also I have read the thread and fully understand the significance of the suggested title. That changes nothing about my concerns with it.
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 11:23 am
The Sass Menagerie
should be adopted already so we can rid ourselves of this argument.Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 11:41 am
In post 3907, quadz08 wrote:generally speaking, if it's got part of the username in it, it's a bad title
this applies here
KHAN MAN
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 11:41 am
Oh that already came up
Yes Sass Menagerie please
Yes Sass Menagerie please
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 11:52 am
Full House
cause the billiard table wouldnt fit
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 1:49 pm
In post 3913, zoraster wrote:The Sass Menagerieshould be adopted already so we can rid ourselves of this argument.
100% agreed
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 1:56 pm
In post 3913, zoraster wrote:The Sass Menagerieshould be adopted already so we can rid ourselves of this argument.
~56% Agreed
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 3:14 pm
I strongly and firmly feel that no Speakeasy titles should be allowed.
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 3:43 pm
Nominate N for "Hello?"
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 3:43 pm
2nd
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 3:43 pm
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 3:44 pm
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 3:46 pm
Hahaha oh yes nth N's title