Pooky Mafia 2! Game Over! Who won?

[Iaisy]

Yeah I thought that it was legit. Oh well.

Unvote

Oh, and how long has this thread been open and we have 5 pages? And I have 20+ posts?

[Charles Davis]

Yea, no kidding, I want to do a reread to vote for one of the people that jumped on both of the mini wagons, but I already think its too much effort.

[Iaisy]

Yeah, but I'm not sure if analyzing you wagon will help any more than analyzing the Russian's wagon.

[Charles Davis]

Agreed. (PS, I wish I got abilities for sandwiching you)

[Iaisy]

I wish I got abilities for my post count and for sandwiching you. Alas, we shall have to wait for SO's mafia.

[Fritzler]

I wish I got abilities for my post count and for sandwiching you. Alas, we shall have to wait for SO's mafia.

SO? Sinister OVerlord? Sandwich O RLY?

[Fritzler]

Shit, again.

[Iaisy]

I wish I got abilities for my post count and for sandwiching you. Alas, we shall have to wait for SO's mafia.

SO?

Sinister OVerlord

? Sandwich O RLY?

[Charles Davis]

Get out of here Fritz. And anyways, you're right SO stands for Sinister Overlord.

[The Heart of Darkness]

We're all doomed. I should only hope I am spared for my whole-hearted descision to

Unvote, Vote: Iaisy

If there is one thing I know, it is the source of our doomedness. The republicans.

[Iaisy]

If you believe that America is doomed because of Republicans, you are wrong. America is doomed because of the fact that they are severly split in two, creating tough decisions that has half the country calling for the takedown of the current president, Democrat or Republican.

[Diamond Jones]

unvote Charles Davis, vote Iasiy

With all the wackos, dark "gods" and crazy, you'd think we'd hit a theme of crazies (that crazy Pooky proffered a Bush vs Vader theme among the choices in polls). I reckon ol' Charlie Davis is just acting his role, and I'm surprised that little Miss Iasiy doesn't recognize this.

Vote may mosey over to Astaroth if Ashano doesn't kick the bucket soon.

[Iaisy]

unvote Charles Davis, vote Iasiy

With all the wackos, dark "gods" and crazy, you'd think we'd hit a theme of crazies (that crazy Pooky proffered a Bush vs Vader theme among the choices in polls). I reckon ol' Charlie Davis is just acting his role, and I'm surprised that little Miss Iasiy doesn't recognize this.

Vote may mosey over to Astaroth if Ashano doesn't kick the bucket soon.

That or everyone is acting crazy because no one knows who each other are.

[Iaisy]

Oh. And I just read Diamond Jones' Profile.
My sig was up first.

[Andrew Mercer]

gosh, why does everyone have to post so much...lol...

vote: Iaisy

, i like it better than any of the other bandwagons, (with her claiming republican miller and what not)

[Joseph Blackwood]

With all the wackos, dark "gods" and crazy, you'd think we'd hit a theme of crazies (that crazy Pooky proffered a Bush vs Vader theme among the choices in polls). I reckon ol' Charlie Davis is just acting his role, and I'm surprised that little Miss Iasiy doesn't recognize this.

[Charles Davis]

W/E dude, I feel for you. (Much harder work than MoS posting owls)

Also, Jeffery Rush, anyone who wants to know, knows who you are, take a hint from blackwood, and create a new account to post pictures one the thread.

[Ashano]

Well my vote'll stand for now with Astaroth threatening to kill me and all.

Personally I'm believing Iaisy's claim for now. Making people talk at length in favour of some conservative issue seems equally evil as making someone post in pictures. I don't really know Pooky's style, but it seems to fit.

[Jeffrey Rush]

sheesh, i go to the mall for a couple hours to go shopping for a new outfit, and i come back to 3 new pages!

unvote: Astaroth
Vote: Iaisy

has anybody figured out the connection between the player's names yet?

[Astaroth]

Okay, roleclaim. I am what is known as the Devil's Advocate, or the Token Repbulican. I can state an arguement each day about a conservative issue. If I do, I may use my role the following night. Also, because you don't quite like Republicans, I'm a miller. I can claim what my ability is later if you wish. But, without further ado, my arguement:

mar·rage

(n)

- The legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife.

According to dictionary.com

The defenition of marrage specifies a man and a woman. Not two people of the same gender. This is the sanctity of marrage, which we must protect. This is why we should ban gay marrage in the United States of America. It is a moral stain on the community which needs to be elimnated.
Some say that this is denying gay people their rights. That is not true. We are not denying them their right to marry. A man can marry a woman, whether they are gay or not.

Some have compared gay rights to the woman's right to vote. These are two completely different situations. Giving women right to vote is okay, in the fact that they are human beings created by that higher spirit in an equal state as men. Gays, while still created by the higher spirit, have turned away from him in their same sex relationships. Why should we accept this immoral practice just because we have allowed people the right to vote who deserved it? Note that we are not denying the gay's right to vote. That would be asburd. We are banning their immoral practice from the soil of the USA.

Also, the liberal media made the gays the hero. Take a look at Will & Grace. I have not seen much of it, but take a look at even a couple minutes, and you will see that Grace depends on Will (the gay guy) for a lot. the media is using shows like Will & Grace to make homosexuality look acceptable and correct. This in turn, makes us, the moral defenders of marrage look like bullys or victimizers. If homosexuality was meant to be, they wouldn't have to use such underhanded methods to gain our trust. they would come right out and say it.

Lastly, here is a good link I found that explains a lot about the current situation:
http://www.intellectualconservative.com ... e3520.html. Thank you for your time.

are we against female on female scenes too....

[Astaroth]

Well my vote'll stand for now with Astaroth

threatening

to kill me and all..

[Jeffrey Rush]

are we against female on female scenes too....

you are such a stereotypical guy! girl on girl action is hot, but what about guy on guy action? do you think that is hot, too? why is it lesbianism is accepted more freely than gay behaviour?

[Astaroth]

are we against female on female scenes too....

you are such a stereotypical guy! girl on girl action is hot, but what about guy on guy action? do you think that is hot, too? why is it lesbianism is accepted more freely than gay behaviour?

I'm pretty sure guy on guy action is a sin

[Jeffrey Rush]

[quote="AstarothI'm pretty sure guy on guy action is a sin[/quote]

and what would you consider girl on girl action if not homosexuality?

[Jeffrey Rush]

EBWODP

I'm pretty sure guy on guy action is a sin

and what would you consider girl on girl action if not homosexuality?