I meant "the person claiming vig". My mistake.Yosarian2 wrote:You contradict yourself.Vyolence wrote: There's also the fact that you followed up that advice with a request for the vig to claim:
Even though asking the vig to not kill may have been pro-town advice, asking him to come forth was asking him to sacrifice himself to the scum whether or not he ever killed again. He would have either been a confirmable innocent (something scum doesn't like to have running around) or an SK with a "confirmable" fake claim (somthingYosarian2 (134) wrote:It might be best if he claims now, just so we know if we're dealing with a SK or not (and if there is an SK, so we can force him to either claim vig now or never claim vig at all).nobodywants running around).
And I still think that the vig would still have been a power role, even if it was the right play to sit on his kill for a couple nights (which is a point I'm not arguing).
None of this changes the fact that giving pro-town advice doesn't necessarily equate to being a pro-town player.