Genesis Mafia - Game Over!

[Lady Lambdadelta]

VOTE: SleepyKrew

[SleepyKrew]

Spoiler: how could you do this to me LLD

[Plum]

@Juls - Yes, I did read Kinetic's post in a similar way to the way Salamance did (correct typo 'sane' to 'same', of course, as you did). It's a kinda blandly humorous thing to say about [nominal ultimate Town goal] sold with an emote. In the very early game I did very naturally interpret that as, basically 'trying to sell the notion that speaker drew Town', which at this stage of the game reads scummish to me (more motivation to start off with trying to do that as scum than as Town). If you mean Salamance's more involved bits about Kinetic hypothetically 'being Town a lot' or 'being a super scumhunter', then no, those weren't part of my instinctive reasoning/interpretation, nor are they core to the general argument, as far as I can see it. I'm also not sure why I'd supposedly feel the need to dissemble about this for the purpose of [piggybacking Salamanca's super early vote???].

EBWOP: Actually I liked Lady Lambda's vote on SK a bit, maybe slightly more now?

[Lady Lambdadelta]

Spoiler: Hug?

[Salamence20]

VOTE: Vi

Ah, that feels nice. I was worried I may never have gotten to type that again.

---

Serious vote? Not sure. Random vote? Not really.

Why say this unprompted?

I hate it when people don't have the balls to say one way or another, btw. Especially someone like you, Sal. A player who I happen to think has a particularly large set.

That said, your reasoning is acceptable. A shame you went so far out of your way to undercut it.

That one is on me.

I have to cover my tracks and play to a very high standard or UT will modkill me. Im pretty much not allowed to play the way I do with other games. Thats the deal.

So yeah, in the normal case, I would have gone out and said its a serious vote that demands some pressure, but Im playing it safe because people would probably think Im trolling or some shit.

In other news, Im glad to see its an acceptable reason for you, but why are you leaving your vote on Vi (rvs vote) rather than vote Kinetic or Plum if you believe in Jul's reasoning?

That said, I see Jul's reasoning with Plum, but I think the wagons should point towards kinetic

[vezokpiraka]

plum and SK scumteam.

[Untrod Tripod]

Votecount 1.1

Albert B. Rampage - 1 (Master Zik)
Jazzmyn
Juls - 1 (vezok)
Kinetic - 2 (Salamence20, Plum)
Lady Lambdadelta
Master Zik
Plum - 1 (Juls)
Quaroath
RedCoyote
Salamence20
SleepyKrew - 2 (Quaroath, LLD)
vezokpiraka
Vi - 1 (RedCoyote)

[Juls]

@Plum - The vote was fine. The explanation is off and what I am taking issue with. Instead of an "I agree with Salamence", we got "I independently drew the same conclusions". Reads as over explanatory, as does your follow up to me.

[SleepyKrew]

Actually I liked Lady Lambda's vote on SK a bit, maybe slightly more now?

Explain both please.

@LLD
Anything for Melvin <3

[Plum]

The first a bit for what I assumed the reasoning was (related to you engaging only in joke territory) I liked, though on the other hand not hard to pick up on/vote for as scum, so not too indicative. Seemed better/more productive when your response was in joke territory, less so now because presumably player relationships and stuff, which gives context that makes it all kinda null (also that being more likely context for LLD's vote to start with than what my best guess was initially &c.).

[SleepyKrew]

Cool, thanks.

vezok's turn.

[SleepyKrew]

Wait
Are you saying I should've given LLD's vote a serious response?

[Plum]

Given the overall interpersonal dynamic now apparent? Certainly not. Before that was clear to me, at the time I originally mentioned it? Not per se, but given my assumption at the time that the vote had to do with you only responding to joke elements in the thread, that your next response in the thread at all was on a joke level was what I noted.

[RedCoyote]

Plum, do you think you're overexplaining?

[Lady Lambdadelta]

My vote wasn't and isn't a joke, btw.

[Plum]

RedCoyote - Maybe? I don't really care at the moment for myself. It's only overexplaining if it's too much. For me it isn't; for other people, maybe?

[Jazzmyn]

Vote Vi

For old times' sake.

[Salamence20]

My vote wasn't and isn't a joke, btw.

I also enjoy how SK seems do not give a damn about nothing except when it comes to himself and his paranoia about getting voted.

Self-preservation is always good.

[Lady Lambdadelta]

Vote Vi

For old times' sake.

Nice Lain avatar btw.

[Quaroath]

The first a bit for what I assumed the reasoning was (related to you engaging only in joke territory) I liked, though on the other hand not hard to pick up on/vote for as scum, so not too indicative. Seemed better/more productive when your response was in joke territory, less so now because presumably player relationships and stuff, which gives context that makes it all kinda null (also that being more likely context for LLD's vote to start with than what my best guess was initially &c.).

Given the overall interpersonal dynamic now apparent? Certainly not. Before that was clear to me, at the time I originally mentioned it? Not per se, but given my assumption at the time that the vote had to do with you only responding to joke elements in the thread, that your next response in the thread at all was on a joke level was what I noted.

RedCoyote - Maybe? I don't really care at the moment for myself. It's only overexplaining if it's too much. For me it isn't; for other people, maybe?

Plum, serious question - do you always word yours posts in the manner you are here? I don't remember you doing so in our last game together (though that was years back) and I hate digging through current meta on people because I find it warps my reads in active games.

For some reason i'm having a hard time reading your posts and not having the voice of Ford Prefect running through my head.

It's disconcerting.

[SleepyKrew]

Given the overall interpersonal dynamic now apparent? Certainly not. Before that was clear to me, at the time I originally mentioned it? Not per se, but given my assumption at the time that the vote had to do with you only responding to joke elements in the thread, that your next response in the thread at all was on a joke level was what I noted.

What's so noteworthy about me continuing to be jokey though? Wouldn't it have been more noteworthy had I dropped my jovial attitude?

My vote wasn't and isn't a joke, btw.

That's too bad

My vote wasn't and isn't a joke, btw.

I also enjoy how SK seems do not give a damn about nothing except when it comes to himself and his paranoia about getting voted.

Self-preservation is always good.

Or I just find it easiest to begin engaging with a game by talking to others about their reads/perceptions of myself. Very egotistical, I know. Do you think I'm actually worried about the votes on me atm?
(You can't say "lol I was kidding look at how skrew overreacted though" because then UT will modkill you)

[vezokpiraka]

Cool, thanks.

vezok's turn.

The way you are responding to each other seems choreographed. It seems unnatural.

It's just a RVS read, but it's there.

[Plum]

Quaroath - I mentioned I'm stuck on mobile for the moment and that I know it's probably affecting my syntax somewhat.

[Vi]

(You can't say "lol I was kidding look at how skrew overreacted though" because then UT will modkill you)

I can feel the burn radiating right off my monitor.

[SleepyKrew]

Don't pour water on it!