In post 2341, Ranger wrote:<snip snip>
Reasonably Rational:While I think your early play suffered heavily from extreme bias (especially in a sort-of roundabout-OMGUS way), I think you did an excellent job taking up the leadership mantle from day two onward after Titus died. Your theories might not have always been correct, but they were always based on solid assumptions. (You even managed to correctly figure out I was lying about my role in your last post there, Drixx! Just not the right reasons for it.) So good job on doing what good confirmed town should be doing: getting confirmed at exactly the time needed, and then taking up the mantle of leadership precisely when required.
<snip snip>
We suck at early game, D1 in particular, but I don't think it was from bias, other than a bias against arriving at conclusions or acting on conclusions without sufficient supporting evidence...which I suppose does make us inclined to mostly ignore conclusions people reach on D1. Thanks for your thoughts though, more people should do what you just did, and I might later, but I'm pretty lazy.
In post 2347, Jeanne11 wrote:@wg why was I killed instead of RR like you claimed would happen? And why did you town-read LQ? Those are why I scum-read you till the end.
Likely because you were very anti KC on D2, and because your power in combination with the masons allowed for some extraordinary planning outside of the sight of scum. Once Kari revealed their extra vote, we could have confidently conspired with them while keeping our plans outside of the thread, including fake claims and gambits, since you didn't reveal what your other power was...the power level your ability enabled in the town was extremely high(for example, you could have given us a vig or a cop every day(I don't remember what else pistachion had.
). It was, well, just very easy for you to make town more informed than scum.
link me?
