In post 948, lilith2013 wrote:Yes, and I'm not totally sure if I think both of you are scum. I'm waiting to hear more from jester, because I don't want to rule him out yet.
In post 926, lilith2013 wrote:Okay MOHIS, explain why you are voting NM if you don't think he claimed doctor.
In post 955, SnarkySnowman wrote:That doesn't seem like town motivated logic at all.
In post 952, itlepip wrote:@Armaggedon Can mafia NK themself?
In post 1, Armageddon wrote:
26) Do not admit to not having read The Rules. The rules are here for a reason. Read them, follow them, know them.
In post 23, Apricity wrote:VOTE: Diego
I don't get the point of his reaction test, nor why he picked itle in particular.
Random's entry post also confuses me.
In post 46, duppin wrote:Why not? What if it was the doctor?
In post 65, My Other Head Is Scum wrote:Okay, this is the town head speaking.
random seems town.
Jester is town
Diego I'm thinking town.
Not too much for the first 3 pages going on apart from people being petty.
@itlepip - Talk to me about DiamondSentinel. You think that this is scummy?
I wouldn't consider that self meta. It's just someone ducking the RVS stage (null tell).
-Vedith
In post 19, Diego1487 wrote:VOTE: lillith
For not realizing that I misspelled the name before I pointed it out.
In post 78, Not_Mafia wrote:
In post 25, Diego1487 wrote:He placed a vote and gave what looked like a reason for the vote in the same post. I wanted to know if the reason was sarcasm, and therefore RSV, or an actual reason that I was going to analyze.In post 23, Apricity wrote:VOTE: Diego
I don't get the point of his reaction test, nor why he picked itle in particular.
Random's entry post also confuses me.
In post 28, Diego1487 wrote:In post 27, Apricity wrote:In post 25, Diego1487 wrote:He placed a vote and gave what looked like a reason for the vote in the same post. I wanted to know if the reason was sarcasm, and therefore RSV, or an actual reason that I was going to analyze.
It was literally the 3rd post of the game. Did you really expect him to have a serious reason?
No that was why I would have had an issue with it had he said it was serious.
VOTE: Diego1487
In post 72, lilith2013 wrote:In post 54, lilith2013 wrote:I don't think I've played with Fire before
Fire has no way of scumreading me. If the hydra were voting me seriously this early, it would probably come from Vedith because I have played with him before. Also, from what I know, Fire and Vedith have similar playstyles (e.g, unserious/trolling). Therefore, I doubt Fire's vote on me was serious or had any reasonable basis. --> trolling
It had nothing to do with him not sharing reasons.
In post 94, lilith2013 wrote:
In my view, trolling = not serious. Not necessarily a bad thing. I do think you both are not always serious and use a lot of sarcasm, which is trolling to me. In terms of being able to scumread me, I seriously doubt Fire would be able to say right off the bat, while I was obviously RVSing, whether I was scum. Because we haven't played together before.
In post 102, lilith2013 wrote:I believe I've read through one or two of his games, which gave me a general idea of how he behaves and his posting style. As I only have one finished game onsite, I doubt anyone would know enough about me to know my playstyle.
What kind of play would lead you to form a legitimate reason to vote someone you'd never played with before?
In post 23, Apricity wrote:VOTE: Diego
I don't get the point of his reaction test, nor why he picked itle in particular.
Random's entry post also confuses me.
In post 15, Diego1487 wrote:Ok. That's what the intent behind the question.In post 13, itlepip wrote:its RVS dude...
In post 23, Apricity wrote:VOTE: Diego
I don't get the point of his reaction test, nor why he picked itle in particular.
Random's entry post also confuses me.
In post 81, Sharky5x wrote:diego may have possibly just done something stupid rather than scumslipped or anything, would like to move on from it. so many people jumped on him its kinda odd
In post 965, Koggz wrote:In post 65, My Other Head Is Scum wrote:Okay, this is the town head speaking.
random seems town.
Jester is town
Diego I'm thinking town.
Not too much for the first 3 pages going on apart from people being petty.
@itlepip - Talk to me about DiamondSentinel. You think that this is scummy?
I wouldn't consider that self meta. It's just someone ducking the RVS stage (null tell).
-Vedith
town 3 yes
In post 86, My Other Head Is Scum wrote:78 - Man of many words. This also makes me think Diego is town more. I think that the votes are in the wrong place.
In post 86, My Other Head Is Scum wrote:In post 81, Sharky5x wrote:I overuse wording like "make a case" srry
diego may have possibly just done something stupid rather than scumslipped or anything, would like to move on from it. so many people jumped on him its kinda odd
Why are you apologising? It's normally a sign of scum trying to get town onside for me.
I like the rest of the post though.
In post 86, My Other Head Is Scum wrote:In post 84, DiamondSentinel wrote:If someone is at L-1 and gives me a decent reason for voting, then I will vote. Otherwise, I will not be voting anytime soon.
No.
UNVOTE: Whoever
VOTE: Diamond
Still on page 4. This is going to be a fantastic game.
Jester - Where's the spam?
-Vedith
In post 88, Sharky5x wrote:while I think he could equally be a misguided townie as weak scum, I can understand voting him, as the question was not useful in any way and could be contrived as scum wanting to appear like he's scumhunting. I do think scum on his wagon is a possibility, but I'm not going to bank on that just yetIn post 83, The_Jester wrote:Sharky, do you think there's scum on Diego's wagon?
In post 88, Sharky5x wrote:why?! is the first day so pointless we shouldn't gather any information on it whatsoever?In post 84, DiamondSentinel wrote:If someone is at L-1 and gives me a decent reason for voting, then I will vote. Otherwise, I will not be voting anytime soon.
how bout we put you at l-1 for "no participation"
decent reason enough?
In post 91, Sharky5x wrote:I checked the one other full game he played on this site. he was active, just took him hella long to vote anyone. I still disagree with his view and I want to see his response to my postIn post 89, The_Jester wrote:@Sharky why don't you vote him then?
In post 90, My Other Head Is Scum wrote:
If Deigo is town, like I believe, then I expect that there's a scum on there.
-Vedith
In post 82, Armageddon wrote:
DiamondSentinel- 1 - duppin - (L-6)
Diego1487- 3 - Apricity, The_Jester, Not_Mafia - (L-4)
lilith2013- 1 - Sharky5x - (L-6)
Not_Mafia- 1 - randomidget - (L-6)
randomidget- 3 - Diego1487, lilith2013, A Simple Plan - (L-4)
Sharky5x- 1 - itlepip - (L-6)
Players not voting: DiamondSentinel, Lalendra, My Other Head Is Scum
In post 92, duppin wrote:I actually don't like the Diego train. While I didn't agree with what he said, I don't find it scummy at all.
In post 92, duppin wrote:There are a couple of players I'd like to look at actually, but at the moment I am going to keep my vote on Diamond. I don't mind you avoiding RVS, but we aren't in RVS anymore so I'd like to hear from you now. No thoughts on the game?
In post 61, duppin wrote:VOTE: Unvote
VOTE: Vote: DiamondSentinel
no no why you here
is for easy you intent or no
Alright, get us out of RVS then.
In post 62, duppin wrote:Erh, apparently I typed vote as well in the previous post. Just to be sure:
VOTE: DiamondSentinel
In post 36, duppin wrote:In post 28, Diego1487 wrote:In post 27, Apricity wrote:In post 25, Diego1487 wrote:He placed a vote and gave what looked like a reason for the vote in the same post. I wanted to know if the reason was sarcasm, and therefore RSV, or an actual reason that I was going to analyze.
It was literally the 3rd post of the game. Did you really expect him to have a serious reason?
No that was why I would have had an issue with it had he said it was serious.
Why? Do you think it would've been a scumtell if he was serious?
In post 46, duppin wrote:Why not? What if it was the doctor?
In post 99, My Other Head Is Scum wrote:In post 94, lilith2013 wrote:In my view, trolling = not serious. Not necessarily a bad thing. I do think you both are not always serious and use a lot of sarcasm, which is trolling to me. In terms of being able to scumread me, I seriously doubt Fire would be able to say right off the bat, while I was obviously RVSing, whether I was scum. Because we haven't played together before.
Who on Diego's wagon do you think is scum?
As I said, anyone can suspect anyone in a game... I've read 2 or 3 posts of people before and thought that I knew their align. Is it probably wrong? Good chance, but it's still there.
If I haven't played with someone, there's certain things I look out for as a general play to help me decide.
However, what concerns me here with you is this.
In post 72, lilith2013 wrote:Also, from what I know, Fire and Vedith have similar playstyles
In post 94, lilith2013 wrote:I seriously doubt Fire would be able to say right off the bat, while I was obviously RVSing, whether I was scum. Because we haven't played together before.
So you are saying that you can have an opinion on him even though you have never played with him, but his opinion on you would be false?
-Vedith
In post 962, Koggz wrote:In post 1, Armageddon wrote:
26) Do not admit to not having read The Rules. The rules are here for a reason. Read them, follow them, know them.
yes
a simple plan ice notmafia fire diamondsentinel doctor diego1487 wanderer randommidget vanilla townie
yes