Blitz 7: Hardcore Mafia III (Game Over)

[Errantparabola]

UNVOTE:

[Errantparabola]

Firebringer's progression of thought on page 11 seems pretty genuine.

Well eagle didn't read setup so I'm gonna chalk that as town, good we are done

I don't see scum pointing this out.

VOTE: firebringer

This doesn't match your vote.
Explanations are due.

Vote was poe.

You think this makes it likely that ep is town?

I am unsure tbh.
EP scum I don't think is this bad.

It is making me second guess myself.
Though I still think EP isn't scumhunting at all, but that doesn't = Scum.

UNVOTE: EP

Although I just feel relieved, this actually just makes me feel bad that i'm shit town. Oh well, I guess I'll just have to get better.

What is alignment indicative to you, then?

Some things that I find scum indicative
If someone's posts are designed to inhibit scumhunting from others or justify a lack of scumhunting from themself
If someone's posts are designed to vote someone without any repercussion
If someone's progression of thought doesn't run smoothly

Some things that I do not find scum indicative
People disagreeing with my reads

[Errantparabola]

VOTE: Chaotic
Is anyone willing to go with this?

[Firebringer]

Going to do quick iso of Chaotic.

[Firebringer]

Chaotic Neutrality

20 Null
21 Agrees that is a semi bastard game. Null
29 He does have a crush on me. Null but creepy.
35 Pretty opportunistic vote here if you ask me. Scum.
37 Says someone is being trollbait and or dumb. Scumish
39 Fluff
Fluff
[post]62 Fluff
63 says RVS is over. Kind of fluffy still.
100 Says my vote is terrible and I should feel terrible. And being very hypocritical in this post. Scumish/Bad Town
102 Sorry to hear that ;( This is still fluff
113 says someone iso is crap. Maybe towards me? Null/Scummy
121 Says TheLhix was just randomly tunneling and that I am his partner. No strong reasons given. Null/Bad Town?
126 Not reading context here, but this post sounds really bad. Like hey “don’t get mad this is just a placeholder vote anyways” Scummy as shit.
129 Defends Mario. Possibly townish. His reasons aren’t horrible.
140 Complete 180 on TheLhix, so odd. Null
154 Fluff
165 Fluff
166 Says he wants me or TheLhix lynched. He completely forgetting he was reading TheLhix as town just a few of his posts before?
171 Fluff
173 Fluff
182 I can’t follow you Chaotic, now TheLhix is back to town and he was doing a gambit? Also makes a joke about me being modkilled. Still tunnels me. Scummy
193 Funny, cause I am finding not much content in your iso. Very ironic post. Scummy
206 Finally doing something. Townish.
214 Fluff
240 Okay..

242 Everyone wants dead scum except scum, this is fluff.

256 I don’t know how days work since there is no night phase…now that I think about it, how does that work?
258 Puts this vote after EP, its pretty opportunistic and he has been tunneling me forever. Scummy



Its pretty bad and scummy tbh.

VOTE: Chaotic Neutrality

[GuyInFreezer]

MarioManiac4 - Ranger
Extrapolated Eagle - MarioManiac4
Errantparabola - ika
Firebringer - Errantparabola, Chaotic Neutrality

Not Voting - hi im yakko, Extrapolated Eagle, Firebringer

Votes are counted until #271 due to deadline.

The deadline is in (expired on 2015-12-03 18:17:12).

[GuyInFreezer]

Firebringer has been lynched Day 2.

Now it is Day 3.

Deadline: (expired on 2015-12-07 21:06:24)

[Ranger]

Marcos prob town after the extange

No, I'm pretty sure that's scum rage.

1) ranger - strongest townread

How'd I go from being "hard to read" to "strongest townread"? :S

2) Chaotic Neutrality - null-scum but not lynchworthy

How is, in this game, a nullscum read

not

lynchworthy?

[Ranger]

Okay. This is literally a really really scum post.

Notice the wording here?
"might be able to lynch this"

It screems so much opportunistic scum

Honestly...Firebringer's concerns mirror my own.

And Firebringer's unvote of Errant, when doing so likely condemns Fire to be lynched, means Fire's town.

[Ranger]

And, rrr. We lynched town. >:I

I think I actually want to try this.
VOTE: Errantparabola.

[ika]

VOTE: errant

[Errantparabola]

Marcos prob town after the extange

No, I'm pretty sure that's scum rage.

1) ranger - strongest townread

How'd I go from being "hard to read" to "strongest townread"? :S

2) Chaotic Neutrality - null-scum but not lynchworthy

How is, in this game, a nullscum read

not

lynchworthy?

1. Reads change.
2. Because there were people I thought were scummier. I changed my mind, and then I was fine with a CN lynch. I still am. VOTE: chaotic

And if you're still going on about how the words "I might be able to lynch this" make me opportunistic scum, I think I made it pretty clear about the exact meaning of my words making me firmly on the camp of "I definitely can lynch this." Meaning, you know, no opportunistic scum here.

That's the last I'm going to say on the subject, because I know how hard it can be to change your mind, ranger. No point in wasting time defending myself.

[Chaotic Neutrality]

I don't like that I have to rely so heavily on gut this game, but it might be a good test to see how good it is.

This is a blatant excuse to fumble your reads all around with no rhyme or reason.

205 by eagle does not resonate well with me.

Oooh spooky.

Like question the wagon on Mario. Since I have scum read on Mario this is suspcious.

You've gotta be joking, mate. "You don't agree with my reads so you are suspicious?" That doesn't looks like good scumhunting to me

But is it

scummy

?

Also are all your reads based on feely crap and semantics? Because it looks like you're targeting bad play and fluff posting. The more I read the more it looks like a rainbow carousel of scum feels where you're just accusing everyone and throwing dirt at around.

1) ranger - strongest townread
2) Chaotic Neutrality - null-scum but not lynchworthy
3) Errantparabola
4) hi I'm yakko - town
5) eagle - i might be able to lynch this
6) BL0ODK1NG - Dead, assume the worst and say town
7) mariomaniac4 - weak town read
8) ika - might be able to lynch this
9) firebringer - might be able to lynch this

In the posts above this where you ran through the whole game, you barely mentioned fire, Ika is nowhere to be seen, and Ranger you have only negative things to say. Yet Ranger is your biggest town read, and Ika/Fire are your "most lynchable" targets. Not scummiest.

Lynchable

. I love the language here. You also have twice as many lynch-reads as there are scum, and three of your town reads are on dead/afk. I am 90% confident that you're completely making your reads up.

[MarioManiac4]

VOTE: Ranger
You shall not pass.

[MarioManiac4]

The ultimate case on me is that I don't understand something. You're "pretty sure" it's me and then vote for the mislynchable Errant after you see nobody is really scumreading me anymore. Plus I get townfeels from the way Errant interacts with my slot and I don't get the scumcase.

[Ranger]

In the posts above this where you ran through the whole game, you barely mentioned fire, Ika is nowhere to be seen, and Ranger you have only negative things to say. Yet Ranger is your biggest town read, and Ika/Fire are your "most lynchable" targets.

^Basically, this.

[Ranger]

You're "pretty sure" it's me and then vote for the mislynchable Errant after you see nobody is really scumreading me anymore.

Bluntly...sort-of, yes.

I'm not voting you because I don't think if I voted you, you'd get lynched.

I still think you're scum. Just scum who can't be lynched at this moment.

In contrast, I think Errant is scum...and there

is

interest there.

If I voted you and let my vote go to waste, then there's a very real chance another town player ends up lynched. (Firebringer ended up lynched with

two votes

. Two. TWO.)
If I vote Errant, no such concern.

I don't think Extrapolated Eagle is scum.
I also don't think Yakko is scum.
I'm pretty sure the game's an auto-win as a result...but it should still be done with as few town casualties as possible.
And Firebringer should not have been lynched.
If I was on Errant yesterday (my internet failed so I wasn't around, unfortunately--I'd probably have gotten prodded if the mod had noticed), then Firebringer might have been alive now.
So yes I'm voting Errant.

[Extrapolated Eagle]

VOTE: errantparabola

I wish I'd played more attention to day end. Not just voting you because you're being really weird and I don't want to go back to all your games so I can meta you. I'm also scumreading you because that last minute change was scummy. As is most of the stuff you've said, imo. Too me it looks like you're saying weird stuff to contradict people's reads and then going back on what you said for really weird reasoning that basically just says you're the only person who's allowed to read people.

And Mario, I swear I thought you were probably town and you would behave if you got people off your back. But is that an OMGUS vote? C'mon, man. Your reason for voting ranger is "you voted me because I was useless to town" and "you voted someone else who is not helping much either, but I think he's probably town because of the way he looks at me" and "you don't look at me like that anymore."

[MarioManiac4]

Nah I haven't trusted Ranger for years and years.

[Errantparabola]

This is a blatant excuse to fumble your reads all around with no rhyme or reason.

Have you tried scumhunting with this amount of content?

Oooh spooky.

Thanks for this enlightening comment. I really mean it.

But is it scummy?

Also are all your reads based on feely crap and semantics? Because it looks like you're targeting bad play and fluff posting. The more I read the more it looks like a rainbow carousel of scum feels where you're just accusing everyone and throwing dirt at around.

I don't see anything else scum indicative.

In the posts above this where you ran through the whole game, you barely mentioned fire, Ika is nowhere to be seen, and Ranger you have only negative things to say. Yet Ranger is your biggest town read, and Ika/Fire are your "most lynchable" targets. Not scummiest. Lynchable. I love the language here. You also have twice as many lynch-reads as there are scum, and three of your town reads are on dead/afk. I am 90% confident that you're completely making your reads up.

Oh, so this is you reiterating other people's thoughts in another way to make it seem like you're scumhunting, pushing once again a point that I've responded to and am going to cease responding to. Great.

I wish I'd played more attention to day end. Not just voting you because you're being really weird and I don't want to go back to all your games so I can meta you. I'm also scumreading you because that last minute change was scummy. As is most of the stuff you've said, imo. Too me it looks like you're saying weird stuff to contradict people's reads and then going back on what you said for really weird reasoning that basically just says you're the only person who's allowed to read people.

This is a top notch case.
Love it.
1) "I'm the only person who's allowed to read people" is such a misrep that it makes me want to scratch my eyes out. I would rather you give me some gut reads than reads based on some shit logic.
2) That last minute change was scummy? Are you serious? What about it was scummy? Please, do tell.

Ignore this if you think this is some bullshit that I'm just making up to seem townier, but post game, if I get lynched today, I would really appreciate it if people gave me some tips on playing my town game better. Because I feel like I'm a lot townier when I roll scum and I don't know what I'm doing wrong.

[Errantparabola]

Also, I don't like how yakko was early on complaining about activity (which is basically useless) and then now doesn't do anything at all.

[Errantparabola]

You're "pretty sure" it's me and then vote for the mislynchable Errant after you see nobody is really scumreading me anymore.

Bluntly...sort-of, yes.

I'm not voting you because I don't think if I voted you, you'd get lynched.

I still think you're scum. Just scum who can't be lynched at this moment.

In contrast, I think Errant is scum...and there

is

interest there.

If I voted you and let my vote go to waste, then there's a very real chance another town player ends up lynched. (Firebringer ended up lynched with

two votes

. Two. TWO.)
If I vote Errant, no such concern.

I don't think Extrapolated Eagle is scum.
I also don't think Yakko is scum.
I'm pretty sure the game's an auto-win as a result...but it should still be done with as few town casualties as possible.
And Firebringer should not have been lynched.
If I was on Errant yesterday (my internet failed so I wasn't around, unfortunately--I'd probably have gotten prodded if the mod had noticed), then Firebringer might have been alive now.
So yes I'm voting Errant.

If this is scum ranger posting, then I need to reevaluate how I look at ranger as a player.

[Extrapolated Eagle]

How about you play the game, look for scum, stop complaining about lack of content, stop calling other people's logic crap, and realize that at this very moment by responding to me you create content. Now go. Push your reads. Create more content from other people. Find scum. Target them. Prove through your actions, not your complaining skills, that you're town.

[Errantparabola]

How about you play the game, look for scum, stop complaining about lack of content, stop calling other people's logic crap, and realize that at this very moment by responding to me you create content. Now go. Push your reads. Create more content from other people. Find scum. Target them. Prove through your actions, not your complaining skills, that you're town.

Aside from the fact that I'm actively voting a scum read, interacting with that scum read, me calling your ACTUAL CRAP LOGIC crap, interacting with you, yeah, this post is pretty accurate.

[Errantparabola]

That last minute change was scummy? Are you serious? What about it was scummy? Please, do tell.

how about you answer this goddamn question? please.