Blitz 12: Double Trouble! (Game Over)

Squirrelly · Post Post #1200 (ISO) » Wed Dec 30, 2015 8:40 am

In post 1165, Firebringer wrote:I still think tis possible Yakko is town and Errant is the other scum.

What's that based on?

- pers

Firebringer · Post Post #1201 (ISO) » Wed Dec 30, 2015 9:14 am

In post 1199, Squirrelly wrote:This came up before and you responded to it. Now you act as if it's the first you've heard of it. Why?

I was more of talking about how you assumed it was a bus, and I know it isn't a bus, but w/e.

Squirrelly · Post Post #1202 (ISO) » Wed Dec 30, 2015 9:25 am

In post 1117, Kaboose wrote:Firebringer and I are the only slots who weren't on the D3 lynch of the only flipper WW.

Squirrelly, ErrantParabola, Yakko(In that order) all voted on that lynch. They were 3, 4, and 5 of 7 total votes.

If you want my uneducated guess, I would say there's a WW on and off that wagon.

I'm not a WW, I'm town. So Firebringer is a WW.

I would peg Yakko as the other because I think the last vote is more likely to be a scum hopping on the bus than the earlier two votes.

So I think Firebringer and Yakko are the last two WWs.

I think I can even find a post from Yakko that really makes me think that. Once sec let me find it.

In post 1127, Kaboose wrote:If firebringer isn't a WW, it means the ENTIRE WW team was on the WW wagon.

Is that likely?

Sure, why not? The WW lynch was based on a cop guilty, so VCA doesn't mean much, and if anything scum partners will want to be on that wagon.

- pers

Firebringer · Post Post #1203 (ISO) » Wed Dec 30, 2015 9:26 am

Based on Yakko logic, I guess Kaboose has to be scum too.

Squirrelly · Post Post #1204 (ISO) » Wed Dec 30, 2015 9:26 am

In post 1200, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 1165, Firebringer wrote:I still think tis possible Yakko is town and Errant is the other scum.

What's that based on?

- pers

Squirrelly · Post Post #1205 (ISO) » Wed Dec 30, 2015 9:29 am

In post 1095, hi im Yakko wrote:VOTE: kaboose

In post 1096, hi im Yakko wrote:UNVOTE: wait whut I am all fucked up on this.

In post 1101, Kaboose wrote:VOTE: Flubber

I think Flubber is the best lynch today.

In post 1103, hi im Yakko wrote:Intent

In post 1104, hi im Yakko wrote:VOTE: flubber

In post 1105, Kaboose wrote:18 minutes? lol

Wow that was really bad.

- pers

Kaboose · Post Post #1206 (ISO) » Wed Dec 30, 2015 9:52 am

In post 1203, Firebringer wrote:Based on Yakko logic, I guess Kaboose has to be scum too.

Actually, with you being the vote on me, and there not being a quick hammer. I think it even further pushes you to scum. I would hammer FB if he got to L1, and I honestly wouldn't even give intent. I'm not at all afraid to tell you all that.

Kaboose · Post Post #1207 (ISO) » Wed Dec 30, 2015 9:53 am

In post 1205, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 1095, hi im Yakko wrote:VOTE: kaboose

In post 1096, hi im Yakko wrote:UNVOTE: wait whut I am all fucked up on this.

In post 1101, Kaboose wrote:VOTE: Flubber

I think Flubber is the best lynch today.

In post 1103, hi im Yakko wrote:Intent

In post 1104, hi im Yakko wrote:VOTE: flubber

In post 1105, Kaboose wrote:18 minutes? lol

Wow that was really bad.

- pers

Which part? Explain, please.

Kaboose · Post Post #1208 (ISO) » Wed Dec 30, 2015 9:56 am

In post 1194, Squirrelly wrote:Can everyone rank the other players from scummiest to least scummy? I have:

Yakko
Kaboose
Firebringer
Errant

FB
Yakko
Errant
Squirrelly
Kaboose

Errantparabola · Post Post #1209 (ISO) » Wed Dec 30, 2015 10:27 am

Kaboose
Yakko
FB

Errantparabola · Post Post #1210 (ISO) » Wed Dec 30, 2015 10:28 am

In post 1154, Errantparabola wrote:Why don't you like majority opinion?

my dearest have i missed your answer to this question

hi im Yakko · Post Post #1211 (ISO) » Wed Dec 30, 2015 10:44 am

Why does it matter errant?

hi im Yakko · Post Post #1212 (ISO) » Wed Dec 30, 2015 10:59 am

UNVOTE:

Kaboose · Post Post #1213 (ISO) » Wed Dec 30, 2015 11:10 am

In post 1208, Kaboose wrote:
In post 1194, Squirrelly wrote:Can everyone rank the other players from scummiest to least scummy? I have:

Yakko
Kaboose
Firebringer
Errant

FB
Yakko
Errant
Squirrelly
Kaboose

This actually doesn't make sense. Yakko was voting FB. I'm making Yakko scum in that post, so why would they be voting their partner.

FB
Errant
Yakko
Squirelly

That's a better order given how strongly I feel about FB being scum.

I would probably want to lynch errant today based on that because I'm pretty convinced Squirelly is town, and I think there's a scum and a town withing FB and Yakko, so that leaves Errant as 100% scum to me with that thought process.

Squirrelly · Post Post #1214 (ISO) » Wed Dec 30, 2015 11:19 am

In post 1209, Errantparabola wrote:Kaboose
Yakko
FB

I'm ready to vote kaboose today and farside was earlier, just waiting to hear from her to make sure nothing's changed. In case I'm not here, I'd vote Yakko tomorrow.

- pers

Kaboose · Post Post #1215 (ISO) » Wed Dec 30, 2015 11:34 am

In post 1214, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 1209, Errantparabola wrote:Kaboose
Yakko
FB

I'm ready to vote kaboose today and farside was earlier, just waiting to hear from her to make sure nothing's changed. In case I'm not here, I'd vote Yakko tomorrow.

- pers

Please don't.

Kaboose · Post Post #1216 (ISO) » Wed Dec 30, 2015 11:36 am

Like, the fact Firebringer wasn't quick lynched, and the fact I wasn't quick lynched once Firebringer voted me HAS to confirm FB as scum.

Squirrelly · Post Post #1217 (ISO) » Wed Dec 30, 2015 11:37 am

Please explain why we shouldn't - with something more than simply saying you're town.

pedit: How so? Explain this in detail.

Kaboose · Post Post #1218 (ISO) » Wed Dec 30, 2015 11:47 am

If there are, and it has to be likely given the numbers of the other scum team, 2 more WWs, then a town lynch wins the game.

When Yakko voted FB, and there wasn't a hammer, it meant two things.

Either Yakko is scum, or FB is scum. Reason being, if it was town voting town, there would be two WWs left to finish the wagon and win the game.

Then FB votes me, and there hasn't been a hammer yet either. Why not?

The same reason, either I'm scum or FB is scum.

So he's now been apart of two wagons that prove he has a chance of being scum and the game is still going on.

So if you think FB is town, then the scum team is me and Yakko.

If you think FB is scum, then his partner has to be Errant, because you're a claimed PR with no CC.

There's no reason for Yakko to vote his partner if this is LyLo and because of that it means I'm not FB's partner, and Yakko isn't FB's partner.

The scum team has to be FB and Errant.

Kaboose · Post Post #1219 (ISO) » Wed Dec 30, 2015 11:49 am

In post 1209, Errantparabola wrote:Kaboose
Yakko
FB

Oh and even look who put FB at the bottom of their scummiest to towniest list.

It's all right here.

Squirrelly · Post Post #1220 (ISO) » Wed Dec 30, 2015 11:50 am

In post 1218, Kaboose wrote:So if you think FB is town, then the scum team is me and Yakko.

Yep, that's where I'm at, and you acknowledge it's a possible scenario.

Kaboose · Post Post #1221 (ISO) » Wed Dec 30, 2015 11:55 am

See this is why I want to vote errant today.

Because he has to be scum now.

Hold on, please don't hammer or vote unless you're scum I suppose, until I get home. I have to type more in this game. Please give me that.

Errantparabola · Post Post #1222 (ISO) » Wed Dec 30, 2015 12:11 pm

In post 1216, Kaboose wrote:Like, the fact Firebringer wasn't quick lynched, and the fact I wasn't quick lynched once Firebringer voted me HAS to confirm FB as scum.

quicklynch logic is not good logic.
fmpov logic is also pretty weak. but at least better than quicklynch logic.

i don't like yakko quickhammer fishing. That seems to me an extremely risky move. So that makes yakko likely scum knowing that fire won't get quickhammered because yakko is scum already voting fire.
yakko, explain your rationale behind the fire vote. why did you vote knowing that quickhammer was a risk?
so, yeah. i'm agreeing with squirrelly's team theory.

Errantparabola · Post Post #1223 (ISO) » Wed Dec 30, 2015 12:12 pm

i haven't explained myself using the term "quicklynch logic."
basically assuming that scum would quickhammer/won't quickhammer in lylo scenario is not a smart thing to do.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #1224 (ISO) » Wed Dec 30, 2015 12:14 pm

VOTE: kaboose