NY 192: Game Shop Mafia (Over)

[DeathNote]

VOTE: Golden Robster

So you are certain there is only 1 mafia left and that Golden Robster is it?

Because there are many options right now:
1.) Mafia shot Robster (I am assuming this Jailkeep is the one that prevents the person from being targeted as well as targeting others.)
2.) Robster is last mafia and shot.
3.) Mafia shot me.

Options that don't exist.
1.) 2 mafia remain and Robster is one of them.

[DeathNote]

Actually that's incorrect. Robster could still be mafia with 2 alive and they shot me.

[pieguyn]

i think there's about a 0% GR was shot. no offense to GR but i don't think he'd get killed over for instance JJD (or PC-slot if mollie's slot was town read as hard as i'm town reading it).

i don't think you would be shot either unless it is 3 mafia, since 4 mafia or 3 mafia/traitor would imply no SK in the setup. AKA i'm pretty sure Fire's result is a guilty.

[Golden Robster]

Okay here are my actions:

Night 1: No action
Night 2: pirate mollie
Night 3: DeathNote
Night 4: No action
Night 5: Golden Robster

Isn't it slightly convenient that everybody you've listed off has claimed VT.

Did you not ask for everybody's roles BEFORE revealing your results.

My inquiry is two fold: why did you think it was reasonable to wait and why did you not pursue rob day start as scumhunting does not require you reveal information a conclusion about someone does. I dislike your presentation immensely.

i think there's about a 0% GR was shot. no offense to GR but i don't think he'd get killed over for instance JJD (or PC-slot if mollie's slot was town read as hard as i'm town reading it).

i don't think you would be shot either unless it is 3 mafia, since 4 mafia or 3 mafia/traitor would imply no SK in the setup. AKA i'm pretty sure Fire's result is a guilty.

I'm saying that he potentially no killed me or I was attacked. I'm sticking to the traitor theory.

It would make sense for scum fire to implicate me with his fake claim. Added by the fact that we've probably still got a traitor running loose, he's taking a gamble and trying to mislynch me.

That would bring town down to 5 players and I'm pretty sure Fire already knows who the traitor is.

[pieguyn]

{rolecop, miller, BP} only vs. 3.5 scum is scum sided as shit, so that's impossible. that also ignores the fact no killing and mislynching you would literally be the same position for him as ... not even bothering and just choosing to kill someone in the first place.

[pieguyn]

the only way this isn't a guilty somehow is if you were shot. Fire isn't scum and scum wouldn't shoot DN.

i don't believe you would be shot here

[JarJarDrinks]

Isn't it slightly convenient that everybody you've listed off has claimed VT.

But he claimed BEFORE almost everyone else claimed. If he was scum, he'd be taking a huge gamble that he doesn't get countered.

[Golden Robster]

Isn't it slightly convenient that everybody you've listed off has claimed VT.

But he claimed BEFORE almost everyone else claimed. If he was scum, he'd be taking a huge gamble that he doesn't get countered.

He claimed PR but refused to give results out BEFORE everybody else had claimed.

[AngryPidgeon]

Vote Count 6.2

Golden Robster (2) - JarJarDrinks, Firebringer

Not voting (5): Golden Robster, Political Clout, pieguyn, Errant Parabola, DeathNote

(expired on 2016-02-25 11:59:59)

[Political Clout]

Can we discuss errant as a possible lynch as well? I dislike how limiting we're being here.

[JarJarDrinks]

He claimed PR but refused to give results out BEFORE everybody else had claimed.

False, he claimed PR. THEN he said he was impatient and claimed JK before anyone claimed their roles.

The only thing he waited on was giving out his targets.

[JarJarDrinks]

Can we discuss errant as a possible lynch as well? I dislike how limiting we're being here.

Well errant was in the hood w/ mafia. That's a pretty big point in his favor.

[Firebringer]

Isn't it slightly convenient that everybody you've listed off has claimed VT.

Convenient? Really?

I know you have to like frame me as scummy and what not.

But please try harder.

[pieguyn]

Can we discuss errant as a possible lynch as well? I dislike how limiting we're being here.

we can discuss it, but you'd have to have a compelling explanation for why Fire's result isn't a guilty if you wanna lynch outside of GR in the end

[Golden Robster]

Isn't it slightly convenient that everybody you've listed off has claimed VT.

Convenient? Really?

I know you have to like frame me as scummy and what not.

But please try harder.

I'm just stating the possibilities but I like how nobody thinks i'd get n'ked over JJ.

[Firebringer]

I'm just stating the possibilities but I like how nobody thinks i'd get n'ked over JJ.

Why would I even humor that possibility? I know its 100% not true. You went on the defensive and immediately called my actions "convenient"

[Golden Robster]

I'm just stating the possibilities but I like how nobody thinks i'd get n'ked over JJ.

Why would I even humor that possibility? I know its 100% not true. You went on the defensive and immediately called my actions "convenient"

I'm being slightly defensive because it isn't true; I don't see why I wouldn't be n'ked.

[pieguyn]

vote: Golden Robster (L-1).

[Golden Robster]

I'd like to protest my innocence before somebody hammers.

1. Someone did shoot me and I was jailed.
2. They shot DN.

I'm not sure why these options should be ignored but w/e.

Claiming VT again.

[JarJarDrinks]

I'd like to protest my innocence before somebody hammers.

1. Someone did shoot me and I was jailed.
2. They shot DN.

I'm not sure why these options should be ignored but w/e.

Claiming VT again.

what happened to:
3. Fire is scum and is fakeclaiming



Like you specifically went out of your way to point out how convenient it was that he waited till after the claims to tell us his actions. Why mention that if not to imply he's scum?

[DeathNote]

It's very true. The was the highest form of discrediting.

I am content with this vote i suppose.

[Golden Robster]

I'd like to protest my innocence before somebody hammers.

1. Someone did shoot me and I was jailed.
2. They shot DN.

I'm not sure why these options should be ignored but w/e.

Claiming VT again.

what happened to:
3. Fire is scum and is fakeclaiming



Like you specifically went out of your way to point out how convenient it was that he waited till after the claims to tell us his actions. Why mention that if not to imply he's scum?

I did imply that he was scum, but nobody seems to believe me, so why bother?

[Golden Robster]

It's very true. The was the highest form of discrediting.

I am content with this vote i suppose.

Then why aren't you voting?

I'm just saying that there are more likely scum compared to me. On the basis that I was shot last night it's pretty convenient from scum's perspective to jump on my bandwagon and say "wooh choo choo mislynch."

[Political Clout]

Can we discuss errant as a possible lynch as well? I dislike how limiting we're being here.

we can discuss it, but you'd have to have a compelling explanation for why Fire's result isn't a guilty if you wanna lynch outside of GR in the end

It wasn't so much about lynching outside of GR my issue was mainly only discussing GR as a probable lynch. I haven't really read Errants iso mostly skimmed.

It has gotten me thinking do I wanna lynch outside of GR? It looks like I just have to follow or abstain for now as I do not have a good grasp of the game or the players.

[DeathNote]

I mean... i can end the day if you really want me too?