Mini 1820 — Lazy Summer Mafia (Game Over)

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #900 (ISO) » Sun Aug 14, 2016 1:47 pm

In post 897, rb wrote:I DIDN'T START THAT GAME KNOWING ABOUT OUTSIDE CHAT. I REALISED DURING.

STUPID. FUCKING. LYING. PIECE. OF. SHIT.

Yes, I believe that. I believe you found out about OC in the game in the message you left to cheese which I gave an image of. That is what my argument is, not that you knew about it the whole game.

rb · Post Post #901 (ISO) » Sun Aug 14, 2016 1:48 pm

Yeah and your reason for scumreading me is?

rb · Post Post #902 (ISO) » Sun Aug 14, 2016 1:48 pm

Some dumb shit that happened in that joke game? Rofl.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #903 (ISO) » Sun Aug 14, 2016 1:50 pm

In post 901, rb wrote:Yeah and your reason for scumreading me is?

Given you were reading the chat and the game thread, you would know my experience and that you would know I am no longer the lynchbait you claim you say you think I am.

rb · Post Post #904 (ISO) » Sun Aug 14, 2016 1:53 pm

Oh your post 465 cos u threw theory at me? Your theory is fucking shit dude. You ARE lynchbait, you're fucking terrible ROFL.

Yeah and you played like absolute shit that game too. In the game I modded you were shit too. A newbie had to replace you to get your slot out of being lynched.

You're fucking lynchbait every game you play and nothing you've ever said has made me think you're a remotely good player. You. Are. Trash. Stfu.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #905 (ISO) » Sun Aug 14, 2016 1:54 pm

In post 902, rb wrote:Some dumb shit that happened in that joke game? Rofl.

That is not something that is contingent on my point.

rb · Post Post #906 (ISO) » Sun Aug 14, 2016 1:55 pm

Literally a first time player took your slot and made it go from probable lynch to actually being listened to. I have ZERO reasons for thinking you're any better at the game. Why would I?

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #907 (ISO) » Sun Aug 14, 2016 1:55 pm

In post 904, rb wrote:Oh your post 465 cos u threw theory at me? Your theory is fucking shit dude. You ARE lynchbait, you're fucking terrible ROFL.

Yeah and you played like absolute shit that game too. In the game I modded you were shit too. A newbie had to replace you to get your slot out of being lynched.

You're fucking lynchbait every game you play and nothing you've ever said has made me think you're a remotely good player. You. Are. Trash. Stfu.

So? What is your point here? I am bad so that is why I am Scum? What point does this post serve other than attacking me as a person?

rb · Post Post #908 (ISO) » Sun Aug 14, 2016 1:56 pm

Yeah it is contigent on your point actually because you seem to think that you telling me some theory is meant to make me think you're good at the game or something, when I don't even think your theory is good and all examples of your gameplay are basically you being shit in at least 75% of your games.

rb · Post Post #909 (ISO) » Sun Aug 14, 2016 1:59 pm

In post 907, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 904, rb wrote:Oh your post 465 cos u threw theory at me? Your theory is fucking shit dude. You ARE lynchbait, you're fucking terrible ROFL.

Yeah and you played like absolute shit that game too. In the game I modded you were shit too. A newbie had to replace you to get your slot out of being lynched.

You're fucking lynchbait every game you play and nothing you've ever said has made me think you're a remotely good player. You. Are. Trash. Stfu.
So? What is your point here? I am bad so that is why I am Scum? What point does this post serve other than attacking me as a person?

Because your scumread is that I'm not supposed to think you're lynchbait and it "gives you bad feelings" as per 465 because you think I don't really think this. I'm explaining exactly why I really do think this.

And my scumread of you is because this is a fucking woeful case and you know it, but you'll sit back and be smug and act like me pointing out how woeful it is is just me doing AtE or some shit when no, your case literally is that awful and I have every reason to say you're lynchbait - because you are.

rb · Post Post #910 (ISO) » Sun Aug 14, 2016 2:01 pm

Oh and you think scumslips are unreliable, but AtE is such a great scumhunting tool amirite?

rb · Post Post #911 (ISO) » Sun Aug 14, 2016 2:02 pm

Go and discredit people for seeing scumslips while you run around saying you've found scum based on AtE. What a super player you are LQ, you're right, how could I ever think you were lynchbait??

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #912 (ISO) » Sun Aug 14, 2016 2:04 pm

In post 908, rb wrote:Yeah it is contigent on your point actually because you seem to think that you telling me some theory is meant to make me think you're good at the game or something, when I don't even think your theory is good and all examples of your gameplay are basically you being shit in at least 75% of your games.

In post 909, rb wrote:
In post 907, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 904, rb wrote:Oh your post 465 cos u threw theory at me? Your theory is fucking shit dude. You ARE lynchbait, you're fucking terrible ROFL.

Yeah and you played like absolute shit that game too. In the game I modded you were shit too. A newbie had to replace you to get your slot out of being lynched.

You're fucking lynchbait every game you play and nothing you've ever said has made me think you're a remotely good player. You. Are. Trash. Stfu.
So? What is your point here? I am bad so that is why I am Scum? What point does this post serve other than attacking me as a person?
Because your scumread is that I'm not supposed to think you're lynchbait and it "gives you bad feelings" as per 465 because you think I don't really think this. I'm explaining exactly why I really do think this.

And my scumread of you is because this is a fucking woeful case and you know it, but you'll sit back and be smug and act like me pointing out how woeful it is is just me doing AtE or some shit when no, your case literally is that awful and I have every reason to say you're lynchbait - because you are.

Well then your wrong because I am not the lynch bait that you claim I am.

p-edit: You are an asshole. I see no other explanation besides this. I have not directed one single ad hom your way and that is pretty much all you have done at me for like 10 straight pages. Grow Up.

rb · Post Post #913 (ISO) » Sun Aug 14, 2016 2:12 pm

So now that all the reasons for your scumread are obviously false, you gonna keep your vote?

Ofc you are, scumbucket.

Naomi-Tan · Post Post #914 (ISO) » Sun Aug 14, 2016 2:13 pm

In post 867, rb wrote:You can't seriously expect me to sit here and get lied about and then accept that the player who is knowingly lying about me, then sitting back taking shots at my reactions, is a town slot.

I Did with Slandaar and maneul, just because It got exhausting and unproductive to argue my point so I just dropped it because fuck it..

Raskolnikov · Post Post #915 (ISO) » Sun Aug 14, 2016 2:17 pm

Wouldn't him being terrible actually decrease your read-certainty because it's more realistic he'd use bad logic as town? Can you eli5 whats making the difference from LQ badscum to badtown?

I don't know the context enough to know if your reaction is actually reasonable or overblown here but if you can, instead of talking AT him (which realistically is futile if he is scum) summarise why he's scum instead of town misusing meta?

rb · Post Post #916 (ISO) » Sun Aug 14, 2016 2:18 pm

Yeah well Slandaar is probably scum and Manuel's votes make me cry. Kill LQ with me and then we can kill them.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #917 (ISO) » Sun Aug 14, 2016 2:18 pm

In post 913, rb wrote:So now that all the reasons for your scumread are obviously false, you gonna keep your vote?

Ofc you are, scumbucket.

Your overblown reaction makes me think you are butt hurt Scum.

rb · Post Post #918 (ISO) » Sun Aug 14, 2016 2:19 pm

Because Rask, he's not just misusing meta or misreading, he isn't even TRYING to get it right. He might be bad every game but he at least tries as town.

rb · Post Post #919 (ISO) » Sun Aug 14, 2016 2:20 pm

In post 917, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 913, rb wrote:So now that all the reasons for your scumread are obviously false, you gonna keep your vote?

Ofc you are, scumbucket.
Your overblown reaction makes me think you are butt hurt Scum.

Hahahahahaha so fucking stupid, regardless of alignment.

Naomi-Tan · Post Post #920 (ISO) » Sun Aug 14, 2016 2:25 pm

In post 867, rb wrote:You can't seriously expect me to sit here and get lied about and then accept that the player who is knowingly lying about me, then sitting back taking shots at my reactions, is a town slot.

In post 915, Raskolnikov wrote:Wouldn't him being terrible actually decrease your read-certainty because it's more realistic he'd use bad logic as town? Can you eli5 whats making the difference from LQ badscum to badtown?

I don't know the context enough to know if your reaction is actually reasonable or overblown here but if you can, instead of talking AT him (which realistically is futile if he is scum) summarise why he's scum instead of town misusing meta?

Was just thinking this myself, like they both went in 110% really angry at each other and its SUPER hard for me to believe that scum does that, they just don't need to make such a reckless and fullthrottle commitment over a single vote, this just screams town V town to me which is pretty tragic and I think it also explains (other than people just not wanting to read it) why neither party wants to back down. Like scum normally doesn't react like this to a single vote, no one really reacts like this to a single vote and its because this is an engagement furled by emotion that I just feel that its just indicative of town V town. This also is why I starting townish reading Slandaar because he and me also got into this situation. however, I still feel manuel is scum he didn't have the soul in his vote when he put it out there was the emotions of a killer, to be poetic

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #921 (ISO) » Sun Aug 14, 2016 2:25 pm

In post 918, rb wrote:Because Rask, he's not just misusing meta or misreading, he isn't even TRYING to get it right. He might be bad every game but he at least tries as town.

Is that a meta read you are giving there?

rb · Post Post #922 (ISO) » Sun Aug 14, 2016 2:27 pm

Yeah except mine is based on a dozen or so games watching you be shitty lynchbait, whereas yours is fucking terrible and based on like 8hrs played together.

rb · Post Post #923 (ISO) » Sun Aug 14, 2016 2:28 pm

And again, you're just trying to throw more and more shade and doing nothing to actually sort alignments.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #924 (ISO) » Sun Aug 14, 2016 2:29 pm

In post 922, rb wrote:Yeah except mine is based on a dozen or so games watching you be shitty lynchbait, whereas yours is fucking terrible and based on like 8hrs played together.

Well, then like, you don't have a problem with meta reads after putting up such a stink about me using them on you, which you did say at one point?