Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:40 am
Good morning *sips coffee, smokes pipe*
There's a scum who is intent on breaching the town block /note
Elaborate.In post 276, eagerSnake wrote:There's a scum who is intent on breaching the town block /note
In post 231, nn30 wrote:Also, implosion went dark after leaving his vote on luv. It's been ~18 hours since he last posted (compared to some pretty heavy activity on his part early on).
He could just be lurking for legit reasons.
Or he could have started lurking in response to getting some heat and just let the thread move past thinking about him.
These posts occur next to one another (mine was 243, his was 247). I posted in 243 about Implosion potentially using lurking as a scum tactic. He then starts his series of posts, with an explanation for not being aroundIn post 247, implosion wrote:Took longer than I thought to get to this game today so forgive what is about to be a multipost because I think they're more readable than walls. Alas.
I'm pretty sure I've addressed this at length, but I can answer again. I think he's telling the truth, and I think that unless his only role modifier is ascetic, he made a mistake announcing it so quickly. Factor in his town block nonsense, and I have him as strong town with questionable judgement.In post 280, Shadow_step wrote:@Boring, since you are around, what is you read on Eager atm, regarding his claim and stuff?
I guess. I mean, you explained it alright, I was just hoping there'd be more to it.In post 281, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also boring: are you satisfied with my explanation of the thing between me and Grendel?
@town - can you follow my line of reasoning? I ask because I want to see if Implosion is the only one not understanding me.
What I get from what you're saying is he's only posting when it's convenient for him to post yes?In post 289, nn30 wrote:@town - can you follow my line of reasoning? I ask because I want to see if Implosion is the only one not understanding me.
More about the fact he wouldn't read LUVs wall post. He said he will so the scumread shifts to light town because I liked his response.In post 288, boring wrote:Gamma, is it safe to say that your mutual scum-reading with implosion is centered around your differing reads on LUV, or am I over-simplifying. If I'm wrong, please correct me.
I understand but don't find it scummy.In post 289, nn30 wrote:@town - can you follow my line of reasoning? I ask because I want to see if Implosion is the only one not understanding me.
Yep.In post 291, MariaR wrote:What I get from what you're saying is he's only posting when it's convenient for him to post yes?In post 289, nn30 wrote:@town - can you follow my line of reasoning? I ask because I want to see if Implosion is the only one not understanding me.
I think you're looking into that a bit to much and overthinking I don't think that's what he was going for that seems way to smartIn post 294, nn30 wrote:Yep.In post 291, MariaR wrote:What I get from what you're saying is he's only posting when it's convenient for him to post yes?In post 289, nn30 wrote:@town - can you follow my line of reasoning? I ask because I want to see if Implosion is the only one not understanding me.
Also that from 247 - 261 he addresses a significant number of issues, but ignores the ones I've raised with him. The most he responds to me is by giving an explanation for why he hasn't posted in a while.
Apologizing for not posting for a while would have been a fine explanation - had he directed it at me. Instead, to me, it feels like he tried to slip an explanation under the radar without having to directly confront me on anything. THAT felt more scummy than the post pattern itself.
Maria, same question.In post 280, Shadow_step wrote:@Boring, since you are around, what is you read on Eager atm, regarding his claim and stuff?
I thought he was clear cause I didn't know mafia could have that power but I see no reason to lie. So I think it's real regarding if he's town or mafia I'd say town because I just think town would have that more often than scum because we would need a crazy amount of pr's to counter it as already statedIn post 296, Shadow_step wrote:Maria, same question.In post 280, Shadow_step wrote:@Boring, since you are around, what is you read on Eager atm, regarding his claim and stuff?