Page 15 of 54

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:44 am
by drealmerz7
you're so obviously "on the attack" and not even showing a hint of trying to understand anything, you're just looking for anything you can paint as scummy

produce some content about something, eh?

KT and I are pretty much the only players to have generated anything and everyone else is just leeching on to that

WHAT ELSE YA GOT?!?!?!

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:49 am
by Davsto
In post 349, drealmerz7 wrote:you call that effort on a snarky lynch???

noooo, again, that is you just framing a narrative how you want to see it

HORRIBLY OBVIOUSLY TOO
And here we see some classic goalpost moving

Went from "who said anything about lynching Snarky?" to "I'm not putting effort on a Snarky lynch"

If anything, you not putting much effort into it is the point - for someone upset about the gamestate, you can be barely motivated to try and scumhunt beyond lurkers and even then with all the energy of an asthmatic slug

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:50 am
by drealmerz7
I'm not scumhunting LURKERS omfg - I gave him a warning, that is all, CAN YOU LEARN TO FUCKING READ?????

you keep rewriting everything

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:51 am
by drealmerz7
kill this scumfuck please, everyone

geezusfuck how blatant can you fucking get?!

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:51 am
by drealmerz7
you're literally SITTING THERE WAITING TO FIND ANYTHING YOU CAN TO TWIST IT INTO SOMETHING ELSE

AND DOING ACTUALLY NOTHING OF YOUR OWN

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:52 am
by drealmerz7
you defended a habitual lurker

YAYYYYY

how fucking SAFE

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:56 am
by drealmerz7
do you have any thoughts of your own, davsto, that aren't direct or tangental to something I'VE done?

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:02 am
by Davsto
In post 354, drealmerz7 wrote:you're literally SITTING THERE WAITING TO FIND ANYTHING YOU CAN TO TWIST IT INTO SOMETHING ELSE

AND DOING ACTUALLY NOTHING OF YOUR OWN
I mean Tepes gave up on you a while ago while I've found other scummy things you've done

But no I've definitely done nothing 10/10

Maybe if you repeat it enough it'll become true

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:03 am
by Davsto
In post 356, drealmerz7 wrote:do you have any thoughts of your own, davsto, that aren't direct or tangental to something I'VE done?
Snarky is a lurker in general who we shouldn't waste a lynch on but should probably be killed by some means at some point
KainTepes is probtown
Ari has made many posts, but said very little which is a little worrying
Actually, looking through, Ari's issue is a recurring theme - lane, me, Tepes and dream are the only players who really have a decent amount of substance in their posts

And before you go "OH BUT YOU SAID I'M NOT CONTRIBUTING", no, I never said that, I said that you're complaining about the "stale" gamestate while making no effort to push it forwards, and your response is to complain that I'm not doing anything - classic deflection. The fact that I'm hardly a strong pusher has no bearing on what you're doing and that what you're doing is scummy.

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:52 am
by lane0168
In post 349, drealmerz7 wrote:you call that effort on a snarky lynch???

noooo, again, that is you just framing a narrative how you want to see it

HORRIBLY OBVIOUSLY TOO
Can we get a counter on dreal's "your just framing your own narrative" or similar posts? He's said it to Kain, me, and davsto. I don't want to go back and count so I'll just start it at 10.

Where's nama?

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:54 am
by lane0168
We could lynch zefriend too. Waiting to see what he looks like when he scum hunts

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 6:09 am
by lane0168
In post 338, drealmerz7 wrote:with 3? pretty certain, there's bound to be at least 1, and could even be 2 with the sort of scum attention I tend to draw on D1s

they often feel like they can hide on my wagon pretty easily

I am pretty effective evaluating my own wagon, too, feeling who jumps on trying to push the momentum on me or whatever, but 3 is a little small atm

I don't have much reads on ari or dav, but they ping me for potential opportunism at least, ari kind of silently championing lane perhaps?

lane could be towny-cover for either of them, I don't know, of course

if I had to pick I'd say ari+lane more likely duo and dav just mis-guided towny, but is just possible it's 1 scum who has 2 misguided townies and a 2nd scum will jump on to try and push the moment

of course as I say this it changes it all but, meh

things are stale

no one is playing

snarky came in and makes that comment? useless
In post 340, Davsto wrote:
In post 336, drealmerz7 wrote:yo, fellow townies

scum are satisfied to just sit around now and hope we all get frustrated and Yu all reach for LHF (me!)
You're just full of the generic defences aren't you?

"Scum are just using me as an easy lynch"
"Why would scum play like this and draw attention?"
"That's not how I would play as scum"

Could your responses get any more clichéd?
In post 338, drealmerz7 wrote:things are stale

no one is playing
Maybe things would move along quicker if you stopped complaining about the game being stale and started doing things to help move it along other than complain about it being stale and whine about your wagon. Don't just say you're town, show it through your actions and by scumhunting somewhere which isn't conveniently the wagon on you.
snarky came in and makes that comment? useless
That's just how he is, I'm afraid. Most games he's like this.
In post 342, drealmerz7 wrote:
In post 340, Davsto wrote:Maybe things would move along quicker if you stopped complaining about the game being stale and started doing things to help move it along other than complain about it being stale and whine about your wagon. Don't just say you're town, show it through your actions and by scumhunting somewhere which isn't conveniently the wagon on you.
I've produced SO MUCH FUCKING MORE CONTENT THAN YOU HAVE, scum - you're not actually trying to sell this narrative, are you?

geezus

and then you say this in defense of 0content poster? :

In post 340, Davsto wrote:
In post 336, drealmerz7 wrote:
snarky came in and makes that comment? useless
That's just how he is, I'm afraid. Most games he's like this.
yeahhhh, you can die

UNVOTE: lame
VOTE: davsto
"Ari +Lane could be scum on my wagon, Dav misguided Town. Our just one scum" - dreal

"you have generic defense, don't complain, do work. Snarky is like this" - davsto

"you're scum! Vote davsto!" - dreal

Can you explain this turn of events after pressure dreal? So far you have literally voted anyone that pressures you. Not a narrative. Fact

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 7:00 am
by McMenno
In post 340, Davsto wrote:That's just how he is, I'm afraid. Most games he's like this.
ah, 'tis true though

never met a bigger lurksack

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 7:06 am
by Desperado
In post 349, drealmerz7 wrote:you call that effort on a snarky lynch???

noooo, again, that is you just framing a narrative how you want to see it

HORRIBLY OBVIOUSLY TOO
um

No it's not. "Participate or die" cannot be interpreted any other way than as a threat to vote him for lurking.

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 7:07 am
by Desperado
In post 354, drealmerz7 wrote:you're literally SITTING THERE WAITING TO FIND ANYTHING YOU CAN TO TWIST IT INTO SOMETHING ELSE

AND DOING ACTUALLY NOTHING OF YOUR OWN
So is he sitting there waiting to twist what you say into something else, or is he doing nothing of his own?

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 7:11 am
by Desperado
I don't even think Dreal is scum. If he IS scum exhibiting this level of town paranoia, I would be highly impressed. Has anyone played with him before?

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 7:52 am
by lane0168
In post 365, Desperado wrote:I don't even think Dreal is scum. If he IS scum exhibiting this level of town paranoia, I would be highly impressed. Has anyone played with him before?
On one hand, I totally get you. On the other hand, I've been bitten by that thinking before as well. So idk

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 11:16 am
by xyzzy
hey, y'all, it'll probably be sometime tomorrow before I can post another vote count, because there's a
Magic: The Gathering
prerelease tonight, and that's going to occupy my next 12 hours or so! so now you know!

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 12:53 pm
by drealmerz7
In post 363, Desperado wrote: No it's not. "Participate or die" cannot be interpreted any other way than as a threat to vote him for lurking.
wrong

wow

this playerlist is pretty bad :|

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 12:59 pm
by Desperado
???

Explain to me how I'm wrong.

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 1:03 pm
by drealmerz7
maybe I'm a fucking DayVig

there are other options too

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 1:04 pm
by drealmerz7
it could have been an empty threat

it could have been a threat to make a push

it could have been a threat to make a push in the future

maybe I'm fucking scum and I hate lurkers

who fucking knows
!?!?!?

I DO

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 1:05 pm
by drealmerz7
hell, maybe I have an anti-lurk gun as a skill related to my ability

you don't fucking know

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 1:06 pm
by drealmerz7
I shoot it at my target and it gives them a post restriction of 5 posts per day

100 words per post

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 1:06 pm
by drealmerz7
if they fail, they die