Page 25 of 98

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 3:48 pm
by LicketyQuickety
In post 599, Alisae wrote:What is the town motivation behind going for AA now and the town motivation for the 180?
Hell, what's the town motivation behind not even putting their vote on AA but saying they are willing to PL it. Doesn't a PL take priority above all else?
He is reevaluating a slot that would be really easy to stay on as Scum.

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 3:50 pm
by Alisae
You didn't answer the 2nd part.

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 3:53 pm
by ThinkBig
In post 599, Alisae wrote:Hell, what's the town motivation behind not even putting their vote on AA but saying they are willing to PL it. Doesn't a PL take priority above all else?
Because my vote would be a hammer. Do you really want to end D1 now? Didn't think so.

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 3:54 pm
by Alisae
It's 7 to hammer.

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 3:55 pm
by ThinkBig
And he has 6 votes right now. At least the last time I checked.

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 3:56 pm
by Alisae
It was 5 before I unvoted. You counted LQ twice

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 3:56 pm
by ThinkBig
Actually AA is at L-2 now that alisae changed his vote. My point remains. Had I voted for him, it would have been the hammer.

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 3:57 pm
by Alisae
Gimmie the names of who voted for AA before I unvoted.

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 4:00 pm
by ThinkBig
Devil. Though you're right. I did count LQ twice because he voted for him again after the vote count.

His wagon right now is:

All Alone - 3 (Lexa, LicketyQuickety, Devil)

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 4:01 pm
by ThinkBig
VOTE: All Alone

Make that four for AA.

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 4:02 pm
by Alisae
So this is just a huge misunderstanding?

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 4:03 pm
by ThinkBig
It was a vote miscalculation on my part.

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 4:17 pm
by Alisae
...
...
...
Saddup.
My vote is staying.

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 4:18 pm
by TheRealGin-N-Tonic
{LQ, Alisae}
{TB, Shannon}
{Lexa, Prana, Garmr, Jordan}
{Pep, BBT}
{Karnos, AA}

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 4:33 pm
by ThinkBig
Here's where I'm at:

{LQ, Shannon}
{Alisae, Garmr}
{Lexa, Prana, Jordan}
{Pep, BBT}
{Karnos, AA}

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 4:34 pm
by TheRealGin-N-Tonic
Where am I on the list lol

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 4:35 pm
by ThinkBig
{LQ, Shannon, Gin}
{Alisae, Garmr}
{Lexa, Prana, Jordan}
{Pep, BBT}
{Karnos, AA}

I knew I was forgetting someone.

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 4:36 pm
by ThinkBig
Phone posting and tipsy.

Headed to bed. Night.

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 4:39 pm
by LicketyQuickety
In post 595, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 592, Alisae wrote:wtf why?
Because its how I imagine a motivated Town!TB to play like. In an open where he was Scum he came across way different. Its a weak meta read but the contrast is so extreme I can help but think he is Town for it.
Might have to take back this read:
In post 617, ThinkBig wrote:Phone posting and tipsy.

Headed to bed. Night.

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 5:44 pm
by shannon
In post 543, TheRealGin-N-Tonic wrote:If Jordan stops producing content my read instantly flips that Jordan toyed with Karnos a bit to get heat off of him and decided to become complacent that he is no longer the center of attention.
This is a perspective to look at again after a flip.
In post 558, TheRealGin-N-Tonic wrote:Votes are very important for a reason. With 13 players, we can suspect there to be 3 scums as the standard amount in play. This means that every time a wagon reaches 4 votes, you are promised a townie in the wagon. You play find the townie
I never thought of it like that!
In post 593, TheRealGin-N-Tonic wrote:
In post 585, ThinkBig wrote: 1. AA is low-hanging fruit
2. As scum, I go for low-hanging frut
3. Therefore, I am scum.

Please tell me this doesn't fit the definition of inductive reasoning
As scum, I go for low-hanging fruit
AA is low-hanging fruit
Therefore, I am scum.
In post 594, ThinkBig wrote:
In post 593, TheRealGin-N-Tonic wrote:
In post 585, ThinkBig wrote: 1. AA is low-hanging fruit
2. As scum, I go for low-hanging frut
3. Therefore, I am scum.

Please tell me this doesn't fit the definition of inductive reasoning
As scum, I go for low-hanging fruit
AA is low-hanging fruit
Therefore, I am scum.
The conclusion does not follow, and cannot follow logically from the premise. It lies under the faulty assumption that town!TB does not/cannot scum read and/or go after low hanging fruit.
There's an implied premise there, which is that TB is going for low hanging fruit. But yeah, it doesn't follow deductively. We've still got the possibility that TB is Town and going for low hanging fruit - or that TB is going for AA for some reason *other* than him being low hanging fruit.

Can someone who's rad at VCA go back and see why that AA wagon fell apart?

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 5:53 pm
by mastina
You guys are really bad at counting votes. As of page 23, nobody was even remotely close to L-1; we never even exceeded 4 votes on a player. Still reading 24 and 25 though; VC will come momentarily.

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 5:54 pm
by ThinkBig
In post 620, mastina wrote:You guys are really bad at counting votes..
That's why you're the mod and not us.

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 5:57 pm
by ThinkBig
@mod want me to give you a page top for a vote count?

<<< No, but I'll take it anyway! >>>

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 5:58 pm
by mastina
Anyway, I am in fact back.

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 5:58 pm
by ThinkBig
Next post is the top