2017 NFL Football

shaft.ed · Post Post #975 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 2:37 am

In post 973, PJ. wrote:Kaep not old, tho.

still
he is the oldest he's ever been

drealmerz7 · Post Post #976 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 2:51 am

more relevant I think is that I doubt he's been keeping conditioned, who knows though (I'm sure someone does)

plus he's not going to get hired with legal proceedings going against the league anyway

PJ. · Post Post #977 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 2:54 am

In post 975, shaft.ed wrote:
In post 973, PJ. wrote:Kaep not old, tho.
still
he is the oldest he's ever been

This joke is getting older than ever

Bella · Post Post #978 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 3:10 am

In post 969, T-Bone wrote:Well, we don't know that Hundley isn't a good QB like we know Tolizen is. (also Toilzen is like a million years old)

Also, did Brissett really play that well initially, or is he just riding the hype of *not* being Tolizen? He's gotten better as he's gotten more familiar with things sure.

Please stop strawmanning the argument. Nobody has said that the Packers should drop Hundley as starting QB. The point that's being made is that Colin Kaepernick would be a better back-up/potential replacement if Hundley shits the bed than a Division III QB.

Brissett was better than Tolzien, which is pretty impressive considering how late he was signed in the season, and has continued to be better than Tolzien.

In post 972, PokerFace wrote:I made a joke when I said call bradford or bridgewater. MIN are rivals with GB after all. Guess no one realized that

I'd rather have old Romo than old Kaep, but don't think Romo would go for it. They should see what they got in Hundley and maybe look into kaep if that fails.

Kaepernick is 29, or basically right in the prime QB years for anyone not named Brady.

Nero Cain · Post Post #979 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:54 am

I think said Division III QB be given a chance. Tbf, Bryan Robinson played a year for the cards.

PokerFace · Post Post #980 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 11:41 am

When I said old I meant in the past. Back when Romo was good compared to when kaep was good.

Papa Zito · Post Post #981 (ISO) » Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:28 am

In post 980, PokerFace wrote:When I said old I meant in the past. Back when Romo was good compared to when kaep was good.

are you a cornerback

TwoInAMillion · Post Post #982 (ISO) » Sun Oct 22, 2017 10:07 am

Why do the seahawks always make poor decisions in the opponents red zone?

pickemgenius · Post Post #983 (ISO) » Sun Oct 22, 2017 4:15 pm

In post 736, pickemgenius wrote:weekly reminder deshone kizer fucking sucks.

ISO · Post Post #984 (ISO) » Mon Oct 23, 2017 4:31 am

What the fuck Cleveland?

I thought Kessler wasn't the starter because he was hurt. Was he on the roster the whole time? What the fuck? He was a halfway decent QB last year before he got hurt. Why wouldn't he get the first crack at the starting gig?

shaft.ed · Post Post #985 (ISO) » Mon Oct 23, 2017 4:42 am

they wanted to double check that Kizer sucked heading in to next years draft

ISO · Post Post #986 (ISO) » Mon Oct 23, 2017 5:07 am

But Kessler is competent!

I think the Browns just do this to themselves on purpose.

shaft.ed · Post Post #987 (ISO) » Mon Oct 23, 2017 5:29 am

I think theyd rather have draft picks than quasi-competent qb play

Bella · Post Post #988 (ISO) » Mon Oct 23, 2017 5:32 am

I think Hue Jackson is trying to prove a point to someone about how Kizer clearly isn't ready (and may never be ready).

drealmerz7 · Post Post #989 (ISO) » Mon Oct 23, 2017 9:52 am

I'm rewatching the week 1 game Eagles vs. Redskins. I probably won't get to tonight's game until tomorrow.

I think it is not the greatest idea to have 2 teams face each other twice before either has their bye-week.

shaft.ed · Post Post #990 (ISO) » Tue Oct 24, 2017 2:51 am

kinda similar to last season
Iggles get off to a good start against soft competition
lose a talented tackle
....
profit?

drealmerz7 · Post Post #991 (ISO) » Tue Oct 24, 2017 3:43 am

he's more than just a talented tackle

and it looks really bad, fucking brutal - still waiting for the report on it

I don't think anyone in the league can do as good as JP does, so hopefully Vaitai or whoever else they might get to step in there can at least hold their own, and can learn and improve over the next handful of games more than anything. They don't need someone to come in and be 100% right away, but someone with the potential to get it right at a high level as thes season progresses.

shaft.ed · Post Post #992 (ISO) » Tue Oct 24, 2017 4:21 am

I'm guessing they move Lane Johnson over to left and Vaitai goes to right
but that didn't work last year when Vaitai was inserted for Johnson during the suspension
And if they don't swap, I don't see Vaitai doing any better replacing Peters if he couldn't replace Johnson last season

Bella · Post Post #993 (ISO) » Tue Oct 24, 2017 5:49 am

In post 990, shaft.ed wrote:kinda similar to last season
Iggles get off to a good start against soft competition
lose a talented tackle
....
profit?

Yeah, but the Eagles have a favorable schedule for the rest of the season, and the Giants and Cowboys look way weaker than last year, so the Eagles should still win the division. It's the playoffs you should be worried about.

shaft.ed · Post Post #994 (ISO) » Tue Oct 24, 2017 6:34 am

yeah I think their schedule is soft enough and the rest of the team augmented enough from last year to make the playoffs

but they will probably lose to whoever is the hot team at the time, unless they happen to be I spose

Just kinda crappy since the O-line was playing so well thus far

Bella · Post Post #995 (ISO) » Tue Oct 24, 2017 7:58 am

Something I saw pointed out elsewhere is that a lot of the best pass rushers on their remaining schedule rush from the left of the D-line - against the right tackle - which means they might well be better off leaving Johnson at right tackle and putting Vaitai in at left tackle.

ISO · Post Post #996 (ISO) » Tue Oct 24, 2017 8:11 am

In post 988, Bella wrote:I think Hue Jackson is trying to prove a point to someone about how Kizer clearly isn't ready (and may never be ready).

Why does anyone care what Wolverine thinks about any of this?

drealmerz7 · Post Post #997 (ISO) » Tue Oct 24, 2017 8:17 am

gd

figured the Jason Peters injury was that bad, but, damn, it's that bad

Jordan Hicks out for the season too

I think they should keep Lane Johnson on the right and just work a ton with Vaitai to get him to do a manageable job

Bella · Post Post #998 (ISO) » Tue Oct 24, 2017 11:15 am

In post 996, Thestatusquo wrote:
In post 988, Bella wrote:I think Hue Jackson is trying to prove a point to someone about how Kizer clearly isn't ready (and may never be ready).
Why does anyone care what Wolverine thinks about any of this?

Bella · Post Post #999 (ISO) » Thu Oct 26, 2017 8:25 am

In post 995, Bella wrote:Something I saw pointed out elsewhere is that a lot of the best pass rushers on their remaining schedule rush from the left of the D-line - against the right tackle - which means they might well be better off leaving Johnson at right tackle and putting Vaitai in at left tackle.

And this is apparently what the Eagles are doing.