Mini 1895: Shaziro Mafia - GAME OVER

Shaziro · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Wed Mar 22, 2017 7:07 am

Votecount 1.1

Votes

:

Eddie Cane

(2)- Darklyn, Two Face

horrordude0215

(1)- havingfitz

IAlwaysWinSometimes

(3)- implosion, DeathRowKitty, horrordude0215

Boonskiies

(1)- ConManMick

ConManMick

(4)- CooLDoG, Eddie Cane, Boonskiies, Desully

Not Voting

:
IAlwaysWinSometimes, Superhans

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline ends at (expired on 2017-04-04 18:51:30)

CooLDoG · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Wed Mar 22, 2017 7:38 am

In post 45, Eddie Cane wrote:
In post 43, CooLDoG wrote:Imp, rvs target =\= lynch target.

@drk, 3rd vote always scum.

Don't like boo's soft mason claim.

Booskins is the best wagon right now. More pressure would be god. Although a lot of people will probably try to get onto the cmm wagon for no reason. Lets wait and see for a little bit.
he didn't soft mason, we are lovers.

cmm wagon is good wagon. vote cmm now!

the page 3 fucking dumb claim. Awesome dude. Now with the hypothetical doc we have 1/2 chance of two deaths (assuming they kill one of you) as opposed to the 1/6 chance of two deaths + the 9/12 chance of one. Someone good at game theory do this calculation for me, I'm bad at math. But my gut says this was wrong, particularlly asuming that the scum could wisely choose to not kill one of you and thus secure a free kill. And if you just fake claimed, I will murder you with fire. LAL ftw.

So we know at least one of the roles now: VI goes to eddie this game.

CooLDoG · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Wed Mar 22, 2017 7:39 am

seriously, why the hell would you claim that?

Eddie Cane · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Wed Mar 22, 2017 7:39 am

Eddie Cane · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Wed Mar 22, 2017 7:41 am

now the question is does that useless effort post get town cred or is it scum trying to play king

TwoFace · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Wed Mar 22, 2017 7:41 am

VOTE: CoolDog

CooLDoG · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Wed Mar 22, 2017 7:43 am

In post 54, Eddie Cane wrote:now the question is does that useless effort post get town cred or is it scum trying to play king

could be either, lynch me to find out.

implosion · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Wed Mar 22, 2017 7:44 am

Eddie can be town.

CooLDoG · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Wed Mar 22, 2017 7:47 am

In post 57, implosion wrote:Eddie can be dumb town.

An accurate statement, thus why I did not vote him.

TwoFace · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Wed Mar 22, 2017 7:53 am

let's assume you both are town, why would eddie be dumb and not you? You were the one who actually thought he was serious

CooLDoG · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Wed Mar 22, 2017 7:56 am

https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?ti ... _All_Liars
then.

Because I'm not a degenerate who claims lover on page 3 even out of a joke.

Eddie Cane · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Wed Mar 22, 2017 8:00 am

LAL as a word represents my feelings rn

TwoFace · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Wed Mar 22, 2017 8:01 am

implosion · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Wed Mar 22, 2017 8:08 am

In post 60, CooLDoG wrote:https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?ti ... _All_Liars
then.

Because I'm not a degenerate who claims lover on page 3 even out of a joke.

#throwbackthursday to when people actually subscribed to LaL

TwoFace · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Wed Mar 22, 2017 8:18 am

I have no issues with LaL, but it has to be an actual lie and not a joke. That was clearly a joke imo

Superhans · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Wed Mar 22, 2017 8:31 am

In post 64, TwoFace wrote:I have no issues with LaL, but it has to be an actual lie and not a joke. That was clearly a joke imo

+1

Superhans · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Wed Mar 22, 2017 8:33 am

i dont like the way CoolDogs playing, but it certainly isnt scum motivated. The logic sucks.

@BoonSkies i didnt understand what this means:

In post 31, Boonskiies wrote:
In post 28, ConManMick wrote:VOTE: Boonskiies buddying the lynch victim

confirmed scum voting the confirmed townies.

VOTE: ConManMick

CooLDoG · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Wed Mar 22, 2017 8:58 am

In post 64, TwoFace wrote:I have no issues with LaL, but it has to be an actual lie and not a joke. That was clearly a joke imo

I don't have a sense of humor.

horrordude0215 · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Wed Mar 22, 2017 9:11 am

CooLDowN CooLDog. (See what I did there? I'm so punny).

The claim appeared to be pretty obviously false imo... mainly because, as you pointed out, the concept of actually claiming lovers on Page 3 would be terribad. You don't need to run the math there.

TwoFace · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Wed Mar 22, 2017 10:15 am

In post 67, CooLDoG wrote:
In post 64, TwoFace wrote:I have no issues with LaL, but it has to be an actual lie and not a joke. That was clearly a joke imo
I don't have a sense of humor.

Yet you have made posts in games you later said was a joke...

Superhans · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Wed Mar 22, 2017 10:22 am

In post 69, TwoFace wrote:
In post 67, CooLDoG wrote:
In post 64, TwoFace wrote:I have no issues with LaL, but it has to be an actual lie and not a joke. That was clearly a joke imo
I don't have a sense of humor.
Yet you have made posts in games you later said was a joke...

Woosh.

Superhans · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Wed Mar 22, 2017 10:23 am

In post 68, horrordude0215 wrote:The claim appeared to be pretty obviously false imo... mainly because, as you pointed out, the concept of actually claiming lovers on Page 3 would be terribad. You don't need to run the math there.

Completely lost.
What is this referring to?

Superhans · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Wed Mar 22, 2017 10:24 am

In post 50, Shaziro wrote:IAlwaysWinSometimes(3)- implosion, DeathRowKitty, horrordude0215

Is this RVS or serious? From what I've read so far it is a joky wag wag.

TwoFace · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Wed Mar 22, 2017 10:26 am

In post 71, Superhans wrote:
In post 68, horrordude0215 wrote:The claim appeared to be pretty obviously false imo... mainly because, as you pointed out, the concept of actually claiming lovers on Page 3 would be terribad. You don't need to run the math there.
Completely lost.
What is this referring to?

Try reading. It's self explanatory

Eddie Cane · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Wed Mar 22, 2017 10:36 am

In post 71, Superhans wrote:
In post 68, horrordude0215 wrote:The claim appeared to be pretty obviously false imo... mainly because, as you pointed out, the concept of actually claiming lovers on Page 3 would be terribad. You don't need to run the math there.
Completely lost.
What is this referring to?

completely lost myself on what you're completely lost about