OPEN 687: JUNGLE OLIGARCHY (GAME OVER)

[Trihexa]

pot egap
tsrif tae ot deeN

[DeltaW]

Prodge, RVS reads not showing much.

[Trihexa]

no tnemmoc ot tnatropmi gnihton mhU
ko smees nogaw ehT
?yllausu taht ekil yalp eh seod ro ,yadretsey no rebbulF saw fW
.ekaf smees ,hcum oot seirrow oelaeR

[Hellfire Missile]

i feel like i signed up for the wrong game

but it might be because i haven't played in like months

go easy on me

soiwontcry

[Bins]

Votecount 1.2

• (4)

  Theta Alpine
  - davesaz, Gamma Emerald, kmd4390, Flubbernugget
  
  (0)
  davesaz
  
  (0)
  Dunnstral
  
  (1)

  Flubbernugget
  - Theta Alpine
  
  (0)
  Realeo
  
  (0)
  Trihexa
  
  (0)
  shqf
  
  (0)
  DeltaW
  
  (0)
  Hellfire Missile
  
  (1)

  kmd4390
  - Javajoe24
  
  (0)
  Javajoe24
  
  (0)
  Not Fury
  
  (0)
  Gamma Emerald
  
  
  (7)

  Not Voting -
  Dunnstral, Realeo, Trihexa, shqf, DeltaW, Hellfire Missile, Not Fury
  
  With
  13
  alive, it's
  7
  to lynch.
  Deadline in
  (expired on 2017-05-21 09:00:00)
  (May 21^st).
  
  
  Mod Notes:
  

[Flubbernugget]

no tnemmoc ot tnatropmi gnihton mhU
ko smees nogaw ehT
?yllausu taht ekil yalp eh seod ro ,yadretsey no rebbulF saw fW
.ekaf smees ,hcum oot seirrow oelaeR

Realeo seems genuinely confused. Why do you think worried?

[Theta Alpine]

You voted Flubber for not voting Dave after asking Joe why he wasn't, so I interpreted it as you expecting Flubber to scumread Dave when he made that comment.

no i expected flubber to scumread javajoe
why would anyone think i wanted flubber to scumread dave
apparently none of you can understand my joke so i just had to explain it
i voted flubber for not voting javajoe
flubber was accusing javajoe of not voting dave but did not vote javajoe at the same time which was rather hypocritical
at the time i meant it as a joke but now i think i might be serious given how far people have gone with this

and as for the whole coding thing well

Code: Select all

private player vote = null;

public boolean unvote(player p) {
if(p.equals(vote) | p.equals(null)) {
vote.set(null);
return true;
}else {
return false;
}
}
public boolean vote(player p) {
self.unvote(vote);
vote.set(P);
if (vote.equals(p)) {
return true;
}else {
return false;
}
}

[Kmd4390]

Dave, you told us in 50 what you were trying to do. You were looking for a reaction.

Unvote, Vote trihexa

Now I have a real scum read. That post reads as very safe and trying not to ruffle feathers. The realeo suspicion is fine because it's an opinion on a specific player, but saying the wagon "seems ok" and leaving it at that feels unnatural. Why is it ok? Do you agree with it? If so, why not vote on it? Also why not vote realeo? This is scum. Take it to the bank.

Hellfire, any thoughts/reads?

[Kmd4390]

Theta, why no comment on me calling you defensive and aggitated? I thought for sure that would stand out to you.

[Theta Alpine]

Theta, why no comment on me calling you defensive and aggitated? I thought for sure that would stand out to you.

i have only skimmed the posts since 29 so i did not notice when you said that
but to answer the question
i did not have much time to post that day so if it seemed i was agitated that was probably an accurate observation

[Theta Alpine]

Dave, my mistake. I meant Gamma.

Realeao, he appeared to be voting flubber for the same reason that flubber used for his vote. It stood out and I wanted to see how he reacted to a few votes (mine was the third). He seemed defensive and aggitated which seems off on page 2. So my vote stays.

*she
i thought you were talking about someone else when i read it the first time

[Kmd4390]

Ok, pretty fair actually. And I apologize on the pronoun. Won't happen again.

[Theta Alpine]

no tnemmoc ot tnatropmi gnihton mhU
ko smees nogaw ehT
?yllausu taht ekil yalp eh seod ro ,yadretsey no rebbulF saw fW
.ekaf smees ,hcum oot seirrow oelaeR

i went to quote and respond to this and went wtf

Code: Select all

[reverse]no tnemmoc ot tnatropmi gnihton mhU[/reverse]
[reverse]ko smees nogaw ehT[/reverse]
[reverse]?yllausu taht ekil yalp eh seod ro ,yadretsey no rebbulF saw fW[/reverse]
[reverse].ekaf smees ,hcum oot seirrow oelaeR[/reverse]

why would you ever do this
back to what i was originally going to say

that reads as
-not going to comment-
-comment-
-comment/query-
-comment-

so hypocrisy + arbitrary obfuscation + shade throwing = probable scum
VOTE: trihexa

[Flubbernugget]

So yeah I can have two scum reads but can only vote for one

[Flubbernugget]

I can think of a few reasons town would do that

[Kmd4390]

no tnemmoc ot tnatropmi gnihton mhU
ko smees nogaw ehT
?yllausu taht ekil yalp eh seod ro ,yadretsey no rebbulF saw fW
.ekaf smees ,hcum oot seirrow oelaeR

i went to quote and respond to this and went wtf

Code: Select all

[reverse]no tnemmoc ot tnatropmi gnihton mhU[/reverse]
[reverse]ko smees nogaw ehT[/reverse]
[reverse]?yllausu taht ekil yalp eh seod ro ,yadretsey no rebbulF saw fW[/reverse]
[reverse].ekaf smees ,hcum oot seirrow oelaeR[/reverse]

why would you ever do this
back to what i was originally going to say

that reads as
-not going to comment-
-comment-
-comment/query-
-comment-

so hypocrisy + arbitrary obfuscation + shade throwing = probable scum
VOTE: trihexa

I mean

Coming from someone who just voted that slot before you... I don't have a problem with the "hypocracy", don't know what the second thing is, and consider the "shade throwing" maybe decentish.

This vote feels off. Maybe we were on to something with Theta after all. I could see trihexa and theta being scum on opposite teams at this point. I mean even if the obfuscation thing is a decent point, throwing in the word "hypocracy" is my biggest issue here. It feels like an attempt to blow my vote up into a wagon to take the attention off of her.

[Realeo]

This is your daily reminder that we're looking for five scums.

[Realeo]

I'm going to go ahead and assume that Theta townreads me.

Why?

[Realeo]

I'm going to go ahead and assume that Theta townreads me.

Why?

When I say why, I mean "Why you townread me?"

Here's more context.

no tnemmoc ot tnatropmi gnihton mhU
ko smees nogaw ehT
?yllausu taht ekil yalp eh seod ro ,yadretsey no rebbulF saw fW
.ekaf smees ,hcum oot seirrow oelaeR

i went to quote and respond to this and went wtf

Code: Select all

[reverse]no tnemmoc ot tnatropmi gnihton mhU[/reverse]
[reverse]ko smees nogaw ehT[/reverse]
[reverse]?yllausu taht ekil yalp eh seod ro ,yadretsey no rebbulF saw fW[/reverse]
[reverse].ekaf smees ,hcum oot seirrow oelaeR[/reverse]

why would you ever do this
back to what i was originally going to say

that reads as
-not going to comment-
-comment-
-comment/query-
-comment-

so hypocrisy + arbitrary obfuscation +

shade throwing

= probable scum
VOTE: trihexa

My mind went "Holy Shit. Theta accuses Trihexa shade throwing at me?" The implication is

[ 1 ] Theta strongly townreads me. (Because why would scum shade throw a scum?)
[ 2 ] Theta scum slips and admits I'm not his scum partner.

Answer my question, please.

[Theta Alpine]

i meant shade throwing in general at everyone
targeted shade throwing is context sensitive
if trihexa was specifically throwing shade at you i would have been more okay with it
it would have pinged me but i would not have immediately brought it up
but he is throwing shade at you and flubber both

also if you want to know what i meant be arbitrary obfuscation try quoting one of trihexas posts

[Kmd4390]

Scum can be throwing shade at opposing scum.

[Theta Alpine]

yes that is a possibility
i would still want more content to see if that is the case though

not entirely sure what the best move from here is
probably just lynch someone
those people who have not posted much definitely need to be more active before we end the day

[Kmd4390]

That was more at realeo for thinking you must be townreading him.

And "just lynch someone" isn't the right play. It's still early. I'd welcome more votes on trihexa though.

[Dunnstral]

Stuff to say later

[Gamma Emerald]

You voted Flubber for not voting Dave after asking Joe why he wasn't, so I interpreted it as you expecting Flubber to scumread Dave when he made that comment.

no i expected flubber to scumread javajoe
why would anyone think i wanted flubber to scumread dave
apparently none of you can understand my joke so i just had to explain it
i voted flubber for not voting javajoe
flubber was accusing javajoe of not voting dave but did not vote javajoe at the same time which was rather hypocritical
at the time i meant it as a joke but now i think i might be serious given how far people have gone with this

and as for the whole coding thing well

Code: Select all

private player vote = null;

public boolean unvote(player p) {
if(p.equals(vote) | p.equals(null)) {
vote.set(null);
return true;
}else {
return false;
}
}
public boolean vote(player p) {
self.unvote(vote);
vote.set(P);
if (vote.equals(p)) {
return true;
}else {
return false;
}
}

Now I see the ReadingComprehehensionError.